ZHAO Liang. Chinese-English Translation Process in MTI Program Based on Metacognition Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 24-29.
Citation: ZHAO Liang. Chinese-English Translation Process in MTI Program Based on Metacognition Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 24-29.

Chinese-English Translation Process in MTI Program Based on Metacognition Theory

  • Received Date: 2013-01-08
    Available Online: 2021-06-24
  • Translation is a cognitive process.Metacognition is an important concept in cognitive psychology.Research findings in metacognition could be helpful to improve the translation process.This article first presents the basic concepts of metacognition and Anderson’s model of meta-cognition, then briefly reviews research on metacognition in translation studies.Using examples from Chinese-English translation practice in MTI program, this article explores the implications of Anderson’s model of metacognition on translation process.There are five primary components in Anderson’s model: preparing and planning for learning, selecting and using strategies, monitoring learning, orchestrating strategies and evaluating learning.From these five aspects, this article first discusses how to choose translation material;then it illustrates how metacognition monitoring can help the translator select and use strategies, and continuously adjust, improve and perfect the translation process;appropriate evaluation of the translation process will further improve translation competence and help to set the next target.In the end, the translation process is summarized as different responsibilities in different stages, which entail metacognitive factors and learning methods.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Ying. Cognitive Analytical Modeling of the English Subject-verb Agreement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 16-23.
    [2]SONG Ju-lei. A Contrastive Study of Word-formation in Noun Reduplication between Chinese and English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 1-8.
    [3]QIAN Zhen-hua, SONG Zi-ling. Analysis of the Cognitive Dilemma of Virtual Reality Technology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 74-80,112.
    [4]JIANG Su-lan, SONG Qin, XU Juan. On the Quality of Archivists in Colleges and Universities—A Perspective of Iceberg Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 115-118.
    [5]WANG Jian-guo. On Chinese-into-English Translation from the Perspective of Mechanics: A Case Study of Translating Chinese Multi-clause Sentences into English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 19-28,42.
    [6]ZHAO Liang. Comparison of Rules and Competition Model and Words and Rules Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.
    [7]XIA Li. A Review of Chinese-English Translation of Scientific Paper Abstracts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 113-118.
    [8]HE Zi-ran. The Conversion of Conceptual Structures in Pragmatics-oriented C-E Translation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 1-6.
    [9]WANG Li-min, CHEN Xue-jing, HUANG Jing. Stock Price Distribution Model Based on the Relationship between Volume and Price[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 103-109.
    [10]LIU Jing, ZHANG Xiang-lan. Research on Competency Model of Higher Vocational Teachers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 68-73.
    [11]CHEN Ming-yao, XIE Li. On Cognitive and Emotional Persuasion of Multimodal Metaphor[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(4): 73-77.
    [12]XU Sheng-huan. The Philosophy of Mind and the Innovation of Cognitive Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 84-88.
    [13]PENG Zhang-gui, GAO Jun-shan. Structural Dimensions and Cognitive Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 124-126.
    [14]LU Guo-jun. An Overview of the Cognitive Research on Polysemous Words in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 24-30.
    [15]XIONG Xue-liang. A Cognitive Rhetoric Anatomization of Text Structures[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 1-6.
    [16]CHEN Yong-qiang, JIANG Lin. Study on Integration Management Concept Model for Large Construction Projects[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 19-23.
    [17]LIU Xue-feng, XIONG Xiong. Research on the Futures Volatility Forecasting Model Considering Asymmetric Effects of Basis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 17-20.
    [18]LIN Li-jie, PEI Li-fang, GAO Jun-shan. Study on Competence Element of College Knowledge Workers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 141-146.
    [19]ZHANG Li-ying, ZHAO Li-ying. Financing of M&A Decision-Making Model in Industry Consolidation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 33-36,79.
    [20]LI Han. The Research on the Metacognition Monitoring in the Study of Second Language of Doctor candidates[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(2): 67-70.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-070100200300400500
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 56.6 %FULLTEXT: 56.6 %META: 39.5 %META: 39.5 %PDF: 3.9 %PDF: 3.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.6 %其他: 6.6 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %三明: 0.2 %三明: 0.2 %三门峡: 0.6 %三门峡: 0.6 %上海: 0.7 %上海: 0.7 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %中卫: 0.1 %中卫: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %包头: 1.3 %包头: 1.3 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %吉林: 2.1 %吉林: 2.1 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %咸阳: 2.0 %咸阳: 2.0 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %嘉兴: 1.5 %嘉兴: 1.5 %多伦多: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %天津: 1.5 %天津: 1.5 %宁德: 0.1 %宁德: 0.1 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %安康: 1.5 %安康: 1.5 %宣城: 1.4 %宣城: 1.4 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 8.0 %广州: 8.0 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 2.3 %张家口: 2.3 %徐州: 1.3 %徐州: 1.3 %扬州: 2.6 %扬州: 2.6 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %景德镇: 0.1 %景德镇: 0.1 %朔州: 0.1 %朔州: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 2.8 %杭州: 2.8 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %淄博: 0.5 %淄博: 0.5 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 1.8 %温州: 1.8 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 3.7 %漯河: 3.7 %漳州: 3.2 %漳州: 3.2 %珠海: 0.6 %珠海: 0.6 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 4.3 %石家庄: 4.3 %福州: 1.7 %福州: 1.7 %秦皇岛: 2.3 %秦皇岛: 2.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %荆门: 1.5 %荆门: 1.5 %葫芦岛: 0.5 %葫芦岛: 0.5 %襄阳: 0.7 %襄阳: 0.7 %西宁: 4.7 %西宁: 4.7 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.6 %辽阳: 0.6 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %通化: 0.2 %通化: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 2.5 %重庆: 2.5 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %铁岭: 5.2 %铁岭: 5.2 %锦州: 0.3 %锦州: 0.3 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %雅安: 0.4 %雅安: 0.4 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %鞍山: 1.0 %鞍山: 1.0 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他Central District三明三门峡上海东莞中卫丽水伊利诺伊州包头北京十堰南京南昌南通厦门吉林呼和浩特咸阳哥伦布嘉兴多伦多天津宁德宁波安康宣城常州平顶山广州廊坊张家口徐州扬州昆明景德镇朔州朝阳杭州武汉沈阳洛阳济南淄博淮北深圳温州渭南湖州漯河漳州珠海盘锦石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥荆门葫芦岛襄阳西宁诺沃克贵阳辽阳连云港通化邯郸郑州重庆金华铁岭锦州长沙阳泉雅安青岛鞍山马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (459) PDF downloads(79) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return