Articles in press have been peer-reviewed and accepted, which are not yet assigned to volumes /issues, but are citable by Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
Display Method:
Display Method:
2026, 42(3): 1-8.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024100118
Abstract:
The challenge of breaking free from the “historical cycle” is a major issue facing the Communist Party of China and a rational inquiry into the unique question of “how to achieve long-term governance” for this major party. With sustained attention from the theoretical community on this issue, the main topics for interpreting the “historical cycle” conundrum have gradually formed, focusing on philosophical foundations, core domains, narrative logic, interpretative principles, and practical aspirations, thereby constructing a cognitive pathway for the Communist Party of China to break away from the “historical cycle” and achieve long-term governance. As the conditions and environment for the Party’s governance have significantly evolved, associated governance risks have also increased, necessitating a deep understanding of the intrinsic connection between the “four major dangers” the Party faces and overcoming the “historical cycle”, and to explore effective pathways for successfully breaking free from the “historical cycle” under conditions of long-term governance.
The challenge of breaking free from the “historical cycle” is a major issue facing the Communist Party of China and a rational inquiry into the unique question of “how to achieve long-term governance” for this major party. With sustained attention from the theoretical community on this issue, the main topics for interpreting the “historical cycle” conundrum have gradually formed, focusing on philosophical foundations, core domains, narrative logic, interpretative principles, and practical aspirations, thereby constructing a cognitive pathway for the Communist Party of China to break away from the “historical cycle” and achieve long-term governance. As the conditions and environment for the Party’s governance have significantly evolved, associated governance risks have also increased, necessitating a deep understanding of the intrinsic connection between the “four major dangers” the Party faces and overcoming the “historical cycle”, and to explore effective pathways for successfully breaking free from the “historical cycle” under conditions of long-term governance.
2026, 42(3): 9-14.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024110069
Abstract:
Constructing a discourse system of the Party’s self-reform with Chinese characteristics, Chinese style and Chinese spirit, and telling the story of the Communist Party of China’s governance, are key points to the theoretical innovation of Party construction and the reshaping of the discourse system of Party building with Chinese characteristics. In the new era, the Communist Party of China not only creates original concepts and iconic categories to consolidate the narrative foundation of the Party’s self-reform discourse; it also advances multidimensional and diversified discursive synergy to innovate the agenda-setting of Party’s self-reform discourse; at the same time, it clarifies the “four beams and eight pillars” of its systemic architecture to strengthen the supporting elements of Party’s self-reform discourse; and it accelerates the conversion of discursive advantages into practical efficacy, empowering discourse authority enhancement and international image shaping. The multidimensional construction of the Party’s self-reform discourse system in the new era has activated the integration and mutual advancement of theory and practice, has innovated the discourse models of the Party’s self-reform, and has advanced the development and refinement of the discourse system for Party building in the context of adapting Marxism to China’s realities and the demands of the times, and has constantly opened up new horizons for the great practice of Party’s self-reform in the new era.
Constructing a discourse system of the Party’s self-reform with Chinese characteristics, Chinese style and Chinese spirit, and telling the story of the Communist Party of China’s governance, are key points to the theoretical innovation of Party construction and the reshaping of the discourse system of Party building with Chinese characteristics. In the new era, the Communist Party of China not only creates original concepts and iconic categories to consolidate the narrative foundation of the Party’s self-reform discourse; it also advances multidimensional and diversified discursive synergy to innovate the agenda-setting of Party’s self-reform discourse; at the same time, it clarifies the “four beams and eight pillars” of its systemic architecture to strengthen the supporting elements of Party’s self-reform discourse; and it accelerates the conversion of discursive advantages into practical efficacy, empowering discourse authority enhancement and international image shaping. The multidimensional construction of the Party’s self-reform discourse system in the new era has activated the integration and mutual advancement of theory and practice, has innovated the discourse models of the Party’s self-reform, and has advanced the development and refinement of the discourse system for Party building in the context of adapting Marxism to China’s realities and the demands of the times, and has constantly opened up new horizons for the great practice of Party’s self-reform in the new era.
2026, 42(3): 15-21.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024090122
Abstract:
The remarkable achievements and in-depth promotion of reform and opening up have provided a solid cornerstone of discourse confidence and broad space for theoretical innovation for the Communist Party of China (CPC) to construct reform discourse in the new era. Relying on the strong vitality and creativity of reform and opening up, the CPC answers key issues such as the nature of China’s reform path and ideological foundations through people-oriented discourse; clarifies the major tasks of reform in the new era through strategic discourse; refutes discursive interference and dispels the ideological fog through combative discourse; clarifies the action logic of comprehensively deepening reform through tactical discourse; carries forward the spiritual value of the great practice of reform and opening up through leading discourse, and constructs an organic unified logic system that integrates the positioning, essence, expression, dissemination, and purpose of reform discourse. Clarifying the narrative logic of the CPC’s reform discourse in the new era is a necessary measure to effectively respond to Western discourse hegemony and construct the discourse power of socialist reform with Chinese characteristics.
The remarkable achievements and in-depth promotion of reform and opening up have provided a solid cornerstone of discourse confidence and broad space for theoretical innovation for the Communist Party of China (CPC) to construct reform discourse in the new era. Relying on the strong vitality and creativity of reform and opening up, the CPC answers key issues such as the nature of China’s reform path and ideological foundations through people-oriented discourse; clarifies the major tasks of reform in the new era through strategic discourse; refutes discursive interference and dispels the ideological fog through combative discourse; clarifies the action logic of comprehensively deepening reform through tactical discourse; carries forward the spiritual value of the great practice of reform and opening up through leading discourse, and constructs an organic unified logic system that integrates the positioning, essence, expression, dissemination, and purpose of reform discourse. Clarifying the narrative logic of the CPC’s reform discourse in the new era is a necessary measure to effectively respond to Western discourse hegemony and construct the discourse power of socialist reform with Chinese characteristics.
2026, 42(3): 22-30.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024110063
Abstract:
Ideological iconic concepts refer to the key concepts with symbolic and guiding significance, created by the Communist Party of China in the innovation of ideological discourse. They represent a high-level refinement and concentration of socialist ideology. In terms of form, the ideological iconic concepts can be divided into combinational, numerical, and idiomatic types. In terms of content, they are divided into conceptual expression, situational judgment, and action declaration. In terms of logic, they are divided into native and derived types. Ideological iconic concepts have the functions of reference, guidance, program, innovation, and propaganda. They can succinctly summarize and state the global and national conditions, Party standing, and public sentiment, they coordinate and integrate the viewpoints, judgments, and expressions behind them, showcase the action programs in various fields of socialism with Chinese characteristics, achieve the dialectical unity of adherence and innovation in socialist ideology, and become the focus of theoretical propaganda activities such as theoretical preaching and interpretation. In the era of new media, the dissemination mechanism of ideological iconic concepts conforms to the action logic of online micro communication. The propaganda subject should empower these concepts with digital technology, focus on creating theoretical cultural products based on specific iconic concepts, promote the integrated dissemination of ideological iconic concepts, and strengthen their thematic promotion.
Ideological iconic concepts refer to the key concepts with symbolic and guiding significance, created by the Communist Party of China in the innovation of ideological discourse. They represent a high-level refinement and concentration of socialist ideology. In terms of form, the ideological iconic concepts can be divided into combinational, numerical, and idiomatic types. In terms of content, they are divided into conceptual expression, situational judgment, and action declaration. In terms of logic, they are divided into native and derived types. Ideological iconic concepts have the functions of reference, guidance, program, innovation, and propaganda. They can succinctly summarize and state the global and national conditions, Party standing, and public sentiment, they coordinate and integrate the viewpoints, judgments, and expressions behind them, showcase the action programs in various fields of socialism with Chinese characteristics, achieve the dialectical unity of adherence and innovation in socialist ideology, and become the focus of theoretical propaganda activities such as theoretical preaching and interpretation. In the era of new media, the dissemination mechanism of ideological iconic concepts conforms to the action logic of online micro communication. The propaganda subject should empower these concepts with digital technology, focus on creating theoretical cultural products based on specific iconic concepts, promote the integrated dissemination of ideological iconic concepts, and strengthen their thematic promotion.
2026, 42(3): 31-37.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024090150
Abstract:
Based on the three-dimensional comparative framework of “driving mechanism−value orientation−practical path”, this paper reveals the paradigm division of Chinese and Western modernization. Western modernization takes capital proliferation as the core driving force, and has realized the accumulation by dispossession through colonial expansion and financial hegemony. Its development presents the characteristics of individualism, spatial plunder and ecological overdraft; Chinese style modernization takes the needs of the people as the internal driving force through the construction of the new national system and the common prosperity mechanism. This has opened up the practical path of sustainable development, and thus formed a new shared civilization featuring Party leadership, deep integration of urban and rural areas and the harmonious coexistence of civilization. Chinese style modernization has resolved the “North’s Paradox” at the institutional level, surpassed the binary opposition of “efficiency−fairness” at the value level, and provided a non-dependent modernization path choice for developing countries.
Based on the three-dimensional comparative framework of “driving mechanism−value orientation−practical path”, this paper reveals the paradigm division of Chinese and Western modernization. Western modernization takes capital proliferation as the core driving force, and has realized the accumulation by dispossession through colonial expansion and financial hegemony. Its development presents the characteristics of individualism, spatial plunder and ecological overdraft; Chinese style modernization takes the needs of the people as the internal driving force through the construction of the new national system and the common prosperity mechanism. This has opened up the practical path of sustainable development, and thus formed a new shared civilization featuring Party leadership, deep integration of urban and rural areas and the harmonious coexistence of civilization. Chinese style modernization has resolved the “North’s Paradox” at the institutional level, surpassed the binary opposition of “efficiency−fairness” at the value level, and provided a non-dependent modernization path choice for developing countries.
2026, 42(3): 38-43.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025100113
Abstract:
Digital intelligence technology, with its characteristics of efficiency, interactivity, and immersion, provides new possibilities for the innovative development of red culture education, promoting its transformation from traditional models to digital intelligent ones. However, the empowerment of red culture education by technology still faces challenges such as technological alienation, content superficiality, and weakened empathy. Based on the realistic picture of the integration of digital intelligence technology and red culture education, and in combination with the value logic of “knowledge, emotion, will, and action” in red culture education, this article deeply analyzes the core contradictions of instrumentality and purposefulness, fragmentation and systematicness, virtuality and authenticity in the process of technology empowerment. From four dimensions: value guidance, content construction, technology adaptation, and subject collaboration, this article proposes an optimized path for empowering red culture education with digital intelligence technology, aiming to achieve a dialectical unity of technological rationality and value rationality, and enhance the contemporaneity, pertinence, and effectiveness of red culture education.
Digital intelligence technology, with its characteristics of efficiency, interactivity, and immersion, provides new possibilities for the innovative development of red culture education, promoting its transformation from traditional models to digital intelligent ones. However, the empowerment of red culture education by technology still faces challenges such as technological alienation, content superficiality, and weakened empathy. Based on the realistic picture of the integration of digital intelligence technology and red culture education, and in combination with the value logic of “knowledge, emotion, will, and action” in red culture education, this article deeply analyzes the core contradictions of instrumentality and purposefulness, fragmentation and systematicness, virtuality and authenticity in the process of technology empowerment. From four dimensions: value guidance, content construction, technology adaptation, and subject collaboration, this article proposes an optimized path for empowering red culture education with digital intelligence technology, aiming to achieve a dialectical unity of technological rationality and value rationality, and enhance the contemporaneity, pertinence, and effectiveness of red culture education.
2016, 32(1): 1-20.
摘要：
文章旨在通过回顾Halliday、Matthiessen、Martin、Fawcett等国外主要学者有关系统功能语言学及物性理论的研究，并通过呈现及物性理论在国内的发展和再发展情况，厘清系统功能语言学及物性理论的发展脉络，同时指出及物性理论研究中存在的主要问题，从而进一步完善英语及物性系统网络，并建构比较完整的汉语及物性系统网络。
文章旨在通过回顾Halliday、Matthiessen、Martin、Fawcett等国外主要学者有关系统功能语言学及物性理论的研究，并通过呈现及物性理论在国内的发展和再发展情况，厘清系统功能语言学及物性理论的发展脉络，同时指出及物性理论研究中存在的主要问题，从而进一步完善英语及物性系统网络，并建构比较完整的汉语及物性系统网络。
2018, 34(4): 33-41.
摘要：
生态话语分析模式将生态场所观与系统功能语言学理论相结合，为生态语言学研究提供了理论依据。使用生态话语分析模式，从及物性、语气、情态、评价、主位和信息等系统对英国BBC关于中国雾霾报道的新闻标题进行生态视角的细化分析，并进行综合实证分析，能够从语言角度发掘话语的生态意义，揭示媒体报道的生态取向。由于新闻不可避免地承载着意识形态，BBC关于中国雾霾报道的主题不全面，但总体上对负面生态状况给予了负面的报道，BBC的中国雾霾新闻标题具有生态保护型语篇的特点。对BBC新闻标题的话语生态分析也会对我国的新闻媒体有所启发。
生态话语分析模式将生态场所观与系统功能语言学理论相结合，为生态语言学研究提供了理论依据。使用生态话语分析模式，从及物性、语气、情态、评价、主位和信息等系统对英国BBC关于中国雾霾报道的新闻标题进行生态视角的细化分析，并进行综合实证分析，能够从语言角度发掘话语的生态意义，揭示媒体报道的生态取向。由于新闻不可避免地承载着意识形态，BBC关于中国雾霾报道的主题不全面，但总体上对负面生态状况给予了负面的报道，BBC的中国雾霾新闻标题具有生态保护型语篇的特点。对BBC新闻标题的话语生态分析也会对我国的新闻媒体有所启发。
2018, 34(4): 27-32.
摘要：
论文在系统功能语言学视角下，尝试构建包括意识形态、语境和语言本体三个层面的生态话语多层次分析模式，且以该模式对2016年中国环保部长报告进行分析。研究发现，报告内容蕴含了马克思主义生态发展观和共享发展观；语言体现典型的政治语言特色；大量运用语法隐喻；句型基本为陈述句，且主要为祈使句；主位推进模式促进语篇连贯，且广泛使用词汇衔接、连接词及照应这三种衔接手段。多层次分析模式有助于全面深入探讨生态话语的认知功能生成机制，进一步丰富了生态语言学的理论与研究方法。
论文在系统功能语言学视角下，尝试构建包括意识形态、语境和语言本体三个层面的生态话语多层次分析模式，且以该模式对2016年中国环保部长报告进行分析。研究发现，报告内容蕴含了马克思主义生态发展观和共享发展观；语言体现典型的政治语言特色；大量运用语法隐喻；句型基本为陈述句，且主要为祈使句；主位推进模式促进语篇连贯，且广泛使用词汇衔接、连接词及照应这三种衔接手段。多层次分析模式有助于全面深入探讨生态话语的认知功能生成机制，进一步丰富了生态语言学的理论与研究方法。
2019, 35(5): 98-105.
摘要：
行为保全标准中“难以弥补的损害”要件存在内涵解释模糊、实践缺乏系统性指引等问题。为给予实践更加清晰、明确的指引，应从理论上深入分析和系统研究。通过本土解析和比较研究可以认为“难以弥补的损害”是指财产保全和终局裁判均不能弥补的损害。在裁量路径上，应结合难以弥补的损害的性质，将其类型化为损害赔偿无法弥补和赔偿数额难以计算两种类型。
行为保全标准中“难以弥补的损害”要件存在内涵解释模糊、实践缺乏系统性指引等问题。为给予实践更加清晰、明确的指引，应从理论上深入分析和系统研究。通过本土解析和比较研究可以认为“难以弥补的损害”是指财产保全和终局裁判均不能弥补的损害。在裁量路径上，应结合难以弥补的损害的性质，将其类型化为损害赔偿无法弥补和赔偿数额难以计算两种类型。
2016, 32(5): 8-13,60.
摘要：
隐喻场景把系列转喻链和隐喻链整合成虚拟的叙事场景，用故事逻辑激活与场景相关的概念、评价和假定，实现对目标域基于既定立场和意识形态的概念化识解。文章以《经济学人》中涉华政治漫画为例，重点分析频繁使用的“冲突/战斗”多模态隐喻场景的结构特征和运作机制，揭示该类语篇的政治性或意识形态性本质——带有明显的国家立场、偏见和刻板印象。文章倡议解读者在解读该类语篇时，应该清醒认识生产者的政治、意识形态或国家立场，批判地认识它所建构的概念。
隐喻场景把系列转喻链和隐喻链整合成虚拟的叙事场景，用故事逻辑激活与场景相关的概念、评价和假定，实现对目标域基于既定立场和意识形态的概念化识解。文章以《经济学人》中涉华政治漫画为例，重点分析频繁使用的“冲突/战斗”多模态隐喻场景的结构特征和运作机制，揭示该类语篇的政治性或意识形态性本质——带有明显的国家立场、偏见和刻板印象。文章倡议解读者在解读该类语篇时，应该清醒认识生产者的政治、意识形态或国家立场，批判地认识它所建构的概念。
2020, 36(6): 17-25.
摘要：
文章采用国际生态话语系统视角，把能源白皮书视为重要的能源生态话语类型。收集中国和英国发布的能源白皮书，创建两个小型能源白皮书语料库。运用语料库检索软件，对高频词、检索行进行对比分析。语料库分析表明，中英两国的能源白皮书话语均主张采用技术创新路径应对化石能源困局。受能源禀赋、能源发展阶段及社会历史文化语境的影响，两国白皮书也呈现出明显的不同，面对能源困局和未来发展，中国能源白皮书体现出强烈的家国情怀和世界大同意识，更强调采取实际行动，务实解决问题；而英国则更倾向于采用二元对立思想，把能源转型视为国际能源技术和能源霸权角逐的战场。从国际生态话语角度来看，相较于英国，中国能源白皮书体现出更积极的生态意识，视国家为生命有机体，世界各国和而不同；能源资源是大自然的馈赠，人类应节约高效利用能源。文章倡议面对化石能源困局，人类应采用人与自然和谐的生态观，重塑人类的生活、习惯、组织形式和价值取向，从根本上实现从化石能源向可再生能源的彻底转型。
文章采用国际生态话语系统视角，把能源白皮书视为重要的能源生态话语类型。收集中国和英国发布的能源白皮书，创建两个小型能源白皮书语料库。运用语料库检索软件，对高频词、检索行进行对比分析。语料库分析表明，中英两国的能源白皮书话语均主张采用技术创新路径应对化石能源困局。受能源禀赋、能源发展阶段及社会历史文化语境的影响，两国白皮书也呈现出明显的不同，面对能源困局和未来发展，中国能源白皮书体现出强烈的家国情怀和世界大同意识，更强调采取实际行动，务实解决问题；而英国则更倾向于采用二元对立思想，把能源转型视为国际能源技术和能源霸权角逐的战场。从国际生态话语角度来看，相较于英国，中国能源白皮书体现出更积极的生态意识，视国家为生命有机体，世界各国和而不同；能源资源是大自然的馈赠，人类应节约高效利用能源。文章倡议面对化石能源困局，人类应采用人与自然和谐的生态观，重塑人类的生活、习惯、组织形式和价值取向，从根本上实现从化石能源向可再生能源的彻底转型。
2016, 32(6): 113-118.
摘要：
伴随着信息技术与教学实践的深入结合，传统授课方式发生了深刻的变化，信息技术创新了教学理念，丰富了学生的学习体验，也推动了教学模式的革新。翻转课堂这一新的教学模式从美国兴起并很快在全球范围内掀起热潮，文章从文献计量的角度梳理国内翻转课堂文献分布情况，并对国内外翻转课堂的理论研究、模式研究和应用现状等方面进行分析比较，以期为翻转课堂在国内的深化研究提供助力。
伴随着信息技术与教学实践的深入结合，传统授课方式发生了深刻的变化，信息技术创新了教学理念，丰富了学生的学习体验，也推动了教学模式的革新。翻转课堂这一新的教学模式从美国兴起并很快在全球范围内掀起热潮，文章从文献计量的角度梳理国内翻转课堂文献分布情况，并对国内外翻转课堂的理论研究、模式研究和应用现状等方面进行分析比较，以期为翻转课堂在国内的深化研究提供助力。
2020, 36(3): 48-54.
摘要：
2020年初,新冠疫情影响全世界,这场突如其来的天灾打乱了整个市场秩序,许多中小企业停产停工。在政府的正确领导下,疫情已经得到控制,但这场阵痛也暴露了中小企业由于缺乏组织韧性,应急管理能力不足,在疫情的冲击下举步维艰。文章基于应急管理背景下,结合当前市场环境,从组织韧性的概念界定、影响因素入手,深入研究组织韧性对中小企业发展的作用机理,提出三条中小企业锻造组织韧性的路径,为中小企业应对未来的不确定性风险提供理论支持。
2020年初,新冠疫情影响全世界,这场突如其来的天灾打乱了整个市场秩序,许多中小企业停产停工。在政府的正确领导下,疫情已经得到控制,但这场阵痛也暴露了中小企业由于缺乏组织韧性,应急管理能力不足,在疫情的冲击下举步维艰。文章基于应急管理背景下,结合当前市场环境,从组织韧性的概念界定、影响因素入手,深入研究组织韧性对中小企业发展的作用机理,提出三条中小企业锻造组织韧性的路径,为中小企业应对未来的不确定性风险提供理论支持。
2021, 37(1): 66-73.
摘要：
以事后救济为主的环境公益诉讼并不能完全实现原环境的恢复，环境议题从事后救济到事前预防的转捩，促就了预防性环境民事公益诉讼的因应。预防性环境民事公益诉讼的本质是通过诉讼程序落实风险管控的公法责任以发挥法院的环境规制作用，并弥补行政规制的不足。但既有预防性环境民事公益诉讼的规则过于模糊，存在适用盲点，亟需梳理内在规范构造。具体而言，以重大风险为启动前提，但应从“质”与“量”二维标准加以界定；以污染行为和破坏生态行为为审查对象，但应着力于以行为为主附带结果的审查标准；以公共利益为保护对象，但应区分环境公益与环境私益的实质内涵和顺位选择；以法律规定的机关与组织为诉讼主体，但应授予公民原告资格并肯定行政机关的独立参与人身份。除此之外，诉讼参与人之间的风险交流有助于推动预防性环境民事公益诉讼的进程，未来制度改革上应致力于商谈主义司法的形塑，通过强化法院职权以敦促风险交流的充分展开，最终促进法院环境规制权能的完善。
以事后救济为主的环境公益诉讼并不能完全实现原环境的恢复，环境议题从事后救济到事前预防的转捩，促就了预防性环境民事公益诉讼的因应。预防性环境民事公益诉讼的本质是通过诉讼程序落实风险管控的公法责任以发挥法院的环境规制作用，并弥补行政规制的不足。但既有预防性环境民事公益诉讼的规则过于模糊，存在适用盲点，亟需梳理内在规范构造。具体而言，以重大风险为启动前提，但应从“质”与“量”二维标准加以界定；以污染行为和破坏生态行为为审查对象，但应着力于以行为为主附带结果的审查标准；以公共利益为保护对象，但应区分环境公益与环境私益的实质内涵和顺位选择；以法律规定的机关与组织为诉讼主体，但应授予公民原告资格并肯定行政机关的独立参与人身份。除此之外，诉讼参与人之间的风险交流有助于推动预防性环境民事公益诉讼的进程，未来制度改革上应致力于商谈主义司法的形塑，通过强化法院职权以敦促风险交流的充分展开，最终促进法院环境规制权能的完善。
2018, 34(3): 35-41.
摘要：
积极话语分析(简称PDA)由J.R.Martin在1999年提出,近年来受到众多学者的关注，相关论文日益涌现。文章阐述了积极话语分析的缘起和研究现状并指出目前研究中存在的问题和今后研究的方向，以期对积极话语分析研究有所借鉴。
积极话语分析(简称PDA)由J.R.Martin在1999年提出,近年来受到众多学者的关注，相关论文日益涌现。文章阐述了积极话语分析的缘起和研究现状并指出目前研究中存在的问题和今后研究的方向，以期对积极话语分析研究有所借鉴。
2023, 39(1): 15-20.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110102
Abstract:
