Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode

TIAN Mei-yan; DONG Kun

Volume 25 Issue 4

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2009 > 25(4): 60-65

TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.

Citation:

TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.

Citation:

PDF( 266 KB)

Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode

Chinese People's Public Security University, Beijing 100038, China

Received Date: 2009-11-24
Available Online: 2021-06-28

Abstract

Abstract

The investigation mode in current china is “Mixing” mode, which leans to official system and demonstrates the flaw of “paying more attention to fighting, less attention to protection”. To reform the investigation mode and avoid false and erroneous cases, it is urgent to improve relevant legal system. This paper is intended to regulate investigation measures from its origin and fill the legislation gap.
- investigation mode,
- extort confession by torture,
- illegal evidence,
- procedural justice

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	BIAN Guiping. Distributive Justice in the Construction of Social Public Trust[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 1-9. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100087
[2]	HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
[3]	LI Yu-hua, LI Hua-chen. Initiation Conditions of the Compliance Non-prosecution Inspection Process[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 563-570. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040006
[4]	ZHAO Fei-long. Comparison and Comments on Illegal Confessions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 96-102.
[5]	XIANG Da-jun. Towards Cardiff Grammar’s View of Language as Program[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 42-48,69.
[6]	LI Guang-lei, LI Chang-bao. A New Exploration of the Origin of Justice from the Perspective of Stress[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 49-54.
[7]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 120-126.
[8]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[9]	XIAO Jian-guo, CHEN Wen-tao. Study on Constructing Noncontentious Procedure of Realizing the Mortgage Right[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 50-54,72.
[10]	XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xue-meng. Analysis of Means of Secret Protection of Civil Evidence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 75-83.
[11]	HE Jun-wu. Political Justice: the Dimension of Value of Public Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 34-38.
[12]	SI Hua-qiang. The Foundation and the Enforcement Path of Fairness and Justice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 68-75.
[13]	CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
[14]	ZHAO Wei. Problems of Procedure for Judicial Review of Death Sentences and Its improvement Principles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 88-92,111.
[15]	ZHANG Zheng-de, LI Ying. The Relationship between Efficiency and Justice in Economic Analysis Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 78-82,97.
[16]	XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xiao-li. On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 34-40.
[17]	SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33.
[18]	PENG Bo. The Legal View on Liedetector Test and Photography in Criminal Investigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 20-26.
[19]	BI Yu-qian. On Procedure of Saving Evidence from Damage[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 61-67.