Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode

TIAN Mei-yan; DONG Kun

Volume 25 Issue 4

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2009 > 25(4): 60-65

LIU Xiao-zhou. Checks and Balances and the “Vetocracy” Dilemma of American Democracy: A Study of American Democratic Efficiency from the Perspective of Institutional Costs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 87-94.

Citation:

TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.

Citation:

PDF( 266 KB)

Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode

Chinese People's Public Security University, Beijing 100038, China

Received Date: 2009-11-24
Available Online: 2021-06-28

Abstract

Abstract

The investigation mode in current china is “Mixing” mode, which leans to official system and demonstrates the flaw of “paying more attention to fighting, less attention to protection”. To reform the investigation mode and avoid false and erroneous cases, it is urgent to improve relevant legal system. This paper is intended to regulate investigation measures from its origin and fill the legislation gap.
- investigation mode,
- extort confession by torture,
- illegal evidence,
- procedural justice

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	GAI Yi-xin, WANG Shu-qing. The Theoretical Basis and Practical Path of Whole-Process People’s Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 217-223. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100092
[2]	QU Jing. The Dialectical Succession of “Shangtong” and “Shangxian” to Democratic and Centralism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 95-102.
[3]	ZHANG Li-wei, YANG Xiu. Urban Community Governance under the Theory of Inclusion and Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 86-91.
[4]	WU Jun-bin. Analysis of the Value of Deliberative Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 144-149.
[5]	YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
[6]	YUN Chun-xi. The Acme of Thought that the People Are Foundation of Country or the Seed of Democracy——The Orientation of Huang Zongxi's Political Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 39-45.
[7]	WANG Rui-fang. Theoretical Exploration of New Democracy Transition by Mao Zedong and the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 117-123.
[8]	CHEN Xi. Sticking to the Scientific Development, Constructing a Harmonious, Democratic and Creative University Culture[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 8-11.
[9]	LI Zong-ping. Socialist Democratic Rule of Law and Socialist Harmonious Community[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 80-84.
[10]	PANG Jin-you. Modern Civil Society and Democratization: Possibility Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 36-43.
[11]	WU Qun-fang. A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Political Culture in South Korea and Russia during Their Transition to Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 44-49.
[12]	HUANG Zhi-gao. On Relationship between Debate of Sanmin Doctrine and the Formation of New-Democracy Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 127-131.
[13]	CHU Jiang-ting. Post-colonialism Research and the Selection of Educational Development Strategy in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 4-7.
[14]	MA Liu-ying. On Amelioration of the System of Civil Witness in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 87-90.
[15]	KANG Zhi-guo. An Analysis of ZENG Qi's Thought of Democratic Constitutionalism during the Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 73-76.
[16]	MA Li-na. The Basic Socio-economic System:Justice and Efficiency[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 32-35.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	李俊，崔浩婷. 全过程人民民主的生成逻辑、内在优势与实践路径. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版). 2023(01): 1-9 .
2.	李俊，崔浩婷. 全过程人民民主的理论逻辑、内在优势与实践路径. 青海社会科学. 2023(01): 5-13 .
3.	李德恩. 人民法院宪法地位之维系. 北方工业大学学报. 2023(03): 92-101+121 .
4.	过其欢，王义德. 全过程民主视域下完善乡村基层治理路径探析. 淮南师范学院学报. 2022(03): 104-109 .
5.	王洪树. 制度探源：新时代中西方民主政治缘何“一治一乱”. 马克思主义与现实. 2022(05): 126-131 .
6.	孙磊. “西方之乱”与“中国之治”根源探析：基于中西民族政策比较的视角. 民族论坛. 2021(02): 17-24 .
7.	张桂林. 党和国家监督体系原理探析. 政治学研究. 2020(04): 2-14+125 .
8.	王洪树，郭玲丽. “中国之治”与“西方之乱”的民主政治根源解析. 河南社会科学. 2020(10): 31-38 .