Volume 38 Issue 5
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2022  >  38(5): 563-570
LI Yu-hua, LI Hua-chen. Initiation Conditions of the Compliance Non-prosecution Inspection Process[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 563-570. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040006
Citation: LI Yu-hua, LI Hua-chen. Initiation Conditions of the Compliance Non-prosecution Inspection Process[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 563-570. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040006
shu

Initiation Conditions of the Compliance Non-prosecution Inspection Process-Taking the Typical Cases of Enterprise Compliance Reform Pilot of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate as a Sample

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040006

  • Law School, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China

  • Received Date: 2022-04-05
    Available Online: 2022-10-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-25
    Abstract
  • In June and December 2021, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate issued two batches of model cases of enterprise compliance, showing that the procuratorial organs apply the compliance non-prosecution system, through the third-party supervision and evaluation mechanism to supervise and help enterprises to carry out compliance rectification and compliance construction to ensure the stable development of enterprises. In order to ensure the fair application of the compliance non-prosecution system and the smooth progress of the compliance inspection, certain conditions should be set for the start-up of the compliance non-prosecution inspection procedure. Three conditions should be met for initiating the compliance inspection procedure for the enterprise involved in the case: First of all, the enterprise involved in the case should plead guilty and admit the facts of the alleged crime; be willing to accept criminal or administrative punishment, actively cooperate with the investigation and conduct internal self-investigation, and take relevant restoration or remedial measures. Secondly, the enterprise should have the compliance ability, be able to operate normally, and ensure the smooth progress and steady progress of the compliance inspection. Finally, enterprises should make compliance commitments, promise to carry out compliance rectification, strengthen compliance construction, and actively cooperate with compliance supervision.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(21)
  • [1]
    陈瑞华. 企业合规出罪的三种模式[J]. 比较法研究,2021(3):69-88.
    [2]
    最高人民检察院. 最高检发布企业合规改革试点典型案例[EB/OL]. （2021-6-3）[2022-3-11]. https: //www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbh/202106/t20210603_520232.shtml.
    [3]
    最高人民检察院. 企业合规典型案例（第二批）[EB/OL]. （2021-12-15）[2022-4-20]. https: //www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbt/202112/t20211215_538815.shtml#2.
    [4]
    陈瑞华. 企业合规不起诉改革的八大争议问题[J]. 中国法律评论,2020(4):1-29.
    [5]
    张军. 最高人民检察院工作报告−2021年3月8日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第四次会议上[J]. 中华人民共和国最高人民检察院公报,2021(2):1-10.
    [6]
    李勇. 检察视角下中国刑事合规之构建[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2020,28(4):99-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9428.2020.04.007
    [7]
    李玉华. 以合规为核心的企业认罪认罚从宽制度[J]. 浙江工商大学学报,2021(1):61-71. doi: 10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1337/c.2021.01.006
    [8]
    魏晓娜. 背叛程序正义——协商性刑事司法研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
    [9]
    陈卫东. 从实体到程序:刑事合规与企业“非罪化”治理[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(2):114-126. doi: 10.19430/j.cnki.3891.2021.02.007
    [10]
    朱孝清. 企业合规中的若干疑难问题[J]. 法治研究,2021(5):3-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1455.2021.05.001
    [11]
    陈瑞华. 论协商性的程序正义[J]. 比较法研究,2021(1):1-20.
    [12]
    陈瑞华. 刑事诉讼的合规激励模式[J]. 中国法学,2020(6):225-244. doi: 10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2020.06.012
    [13]
    MCCONNELL R D. Plan now or pay later:the role of compliance in criminal cases [J]. Houston Journal of International Law, 2011, 33(3):509-588.
    [14]
    陈瑞华. 企业合规不起诉制度研究[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(1):78-96.
    [15]
    潘志成. 美国《反海外腐败法》最新发展及企业合规启示[EB/OL]. （2019-11-27）[2022-3-18]. https: //mp.weixin.qq.com/s/L8RDBni8mYaL4ttg5Tg_pg.
    [16]
    黎宏. 合规计划与企业刑事责任[J]. 法学杂志,2019,40(9):9-19.
    [17]
    陈卫东. 认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J]. 中国法学,2016(2):48-64.
    [18]
    赵恒. 刑事合规计划的内在特征及其借鉴思路[J]. 法学杂志,2021,42(1):66-79.
    [19]
    叶伟忠. 检察环节构建涉罪企业合规考察制度的探讨[J]. 人民检察,2021(5):32-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4043.2021.05.009
    [20]
    徐日丹. 促进“严管”制度化, 防范“厚爱”被滥用[N]. 检察日报, 2021-04-09（001）.
    [21]
    李本灿. 企业视角下的合规计划建构方法[J]. 法学杂志,2020,41(7):76-83. doi: 10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2020.07.009
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIANG Lin, ZOU Haigui. The Formation Condition and Promotion Path of the Sense of Acquisition of Ideological and Political Theory Course Education in Colleges and Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 45-51. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100107
    [2]ZOU Kailiang, WANG Xindi. Compliance and Construction of Platform Enterprise Data from the Perspective of Sensitive Personal Information Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 87-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023040070
    [3]CHEN Yu, XU Fangdi. Analysis of Criminal Law Doctrine Analysis on the Realization of Incentive Function of Enterprise Corporate[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 798-807. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100076
    [4]ZHU Yuan, XIAO Jia-xin. Research on the Application of Corporate Compliance System under the Framework of Social Enterprises[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 94-102. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090016
    [5]LI Wen-hua, LV Shuai. Legislative Conception of Conditional Non-Prosecution Applicable to Corporate Compliance Cases[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 335-345. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030089
    [6]RAN Bo. From the Perspective of “Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation” Re-discussion on the Effect of Preclusion of the Self-admission System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 177-185.
    [7]CHI Da-kui. The Trial Avoidance Effect of Guilty Plea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 84-90,97.
    [8]WANG Rui-jun, CHEN Yu-heng. Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 78-88.
    [9]ZHANG Mei-fang, LI Ge. Disciplinary Practices and Image Construction of the Midwives in Beijing from 1912 to 1937[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(5): 55-61.
    [10]HE Ze-tang. On the Philological Textual Researching of Feng Yingliu's Su Wen Zhong Gong Shi He Zhu[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 86-91.
    [11]CHEN Cheng. Demonstration on Civil Incapacity of Persons in Custody: A Survey Based on Psychology, Legal System and Judicial Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 84-91.
    [12]GAO Yong-zhou. People Combination in Limited Liability Corporation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 59-64.
    [13]GUO Wei-he. Conflicts between Systemic Evolution and Systematic Growth[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 15-21.
    [14]LIU Zhi-wei, ZUO Jian-wei. Study on Principles, Terms and Procedures concerning Transfer and Jurisdiction of Sentenced Foreigners[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 17-23.
    [15]WANG Shu-ping. The Macro and Micro Conditions of Free Exchange of RMB[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 24-26.
    [16]WANG Chang-ce. Advantages and Disadvantages of Mergence and Cooperation for Chinese Higher Institutions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2000, 16(4): 85-88.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 任海波，郭静怡. 重大涉案企业刑事合规中分案处理机制研究. 河南科技学院学报. 2024(01): 25-32 .
    2. 毛乃纯. 涉案企业合规改革实践的刑法教义学反思及展望. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(02): 78-89 .
    3. 周洁，胡坤. 轻罪时代刑事司法柔性治理. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(03): 89-98 .
    4. 李浩洋，段威. 法院融入企业合规附条件不起诉的正当性及其路径刍议. 北京政法职业学院学报. 2024(02): 60-65 .
    5. 潘新赐. 涉案企业合规考察启动条件研究. 河南工程学院学报(社会科学版). 2024(03): 58-64 .
    6. 李伟. 中国特色现代企业合规司法制度的检察样本——评第四批涉案企业合规典型案例. 人民检察. 2023(03): 31-36 .
    7. 张朝霞. 涉案企业合规：检察经验与检法协作. 政法论坛. 2023(04): 107-120 .
    8. 黄健. 合规不起诉制度审思. 法制与社会发展. 2023(05): 67-88 .
    9. 张惠芳，张墉枫. 涉税犯罪合规不起诉的理论研究与实务操作探析. 山西警察学院学报. 2023(05): 42-49 .
    10. 戚永福，曹瑞璇. 轻罪治理的中国面向：内涵廓清、实践检视及路径选择. 青少年犯罪问题. 2023(05): 14-27 .
    11. 李庆森. 企业刑事合规的本土构建：价值、困境与出路. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2023(06): 104-112 .

    Other cited types(21)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-03010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 37.3 %FULLTEXT: 37.3 %META: 56.5 %META: 56.5 %PDF: 6.2 %PDF: 6.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.9 %其他: 4.9 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Seattle: 3.1 %Seattle: 3.1 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %上海: 7.5 %上海: 7.5 %东京: 0.3 %东京: 0.3 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %北京: 5.4 %北京: 5.4 %南平: 0.3 %南平: 0.3 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %同奈: 0.2 %同奈: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.4 %太原: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 1.7 %张家口: 1.7 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新奥尔良: 1.2 %新奥尔良: 1.2 %杭州: 1.1 %杭州: 1.1 %枣庄: 0.4 %枣庄: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %河内: 0.3 %河内: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.7 %漯河: 1.5 %漯河: 1.5 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %聊城: 0.1 %聊城: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 32.5 %西宁: 32.5 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 3.1 %郑州: 3.1 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %其他其他ChinaRochesterSeattleUnited States上海东京东莞临汾佛山六安北京南平南通台州合肥同奈哈尔滨大连天津太原宣城常州广州张家口成都扬州揭阳新乡新奥尔良杭州枣庄格兰特县武汉河内济南济宁淄博深圳温州湖州漯河潮州珠海石家庄福州聊城芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥衢州襄阳西宁西安诺沃克邯郸郑州重庆金华长沙长治青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (516) PDF downloads(58) Cited by(32)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return