Problems of Procedure for Judicial Review of Death Sentences and Its improvement Principles

ZHAO Wei

Volume 23 Issue 4

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2007 > 23(4): 88-92,111

ZHAO Wei. Problems of Procedure for Judicial Review of Death Sentences and Its improvement Principles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 88-92,111.

Citation:

ZHAO Wei. Problems of Procedure for Judicial Review of Death Sentences and Its improvement Principles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 88-92,111.

Citation:

PDF( 281 KB)

Problems of Procedure for Judicial Review of Death Sentences and Its improvement Principles

ZHAO Wei

China University of Political and Law, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2007-10-22
Available Online: 2021-07-03

Abstract

Abstract

Procedure for judicial review of death sentences, as a procedural protection of death sentences control, exhibits many problems because of part decentralization of authority of examination and approval and non-litigation character of procedure for judicial review of death sentences. As a result, the procedure loses the role in procedural protection and have disadvantage in protecting legal rights of the accused. From the angle of procedural protection to the legal rights of the accused, this passage suggests that procedure for judicial review of death sentences should be reformed with litigation and put forward the basic principles of the reform.
- procedure for judicial review of death sentences,
- authority of examination and approval,
- litigation reform

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	LIN Jing, LIAN Yuting. Localization of the Portability Right of Personal Health Data[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 466-474. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100087
[2]	LI Yu-hua, LI Hua-chen. Initiation Conditions of the Compliance Non-prosecution Inspection Process[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 563-570. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040006
[3]	LI Shi-qin. Ai Siqi's Explanation and Propaganda of Reform Our Study in Yan'an Period[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 314-322.
[4]	XIANG Da-jun. Towards Cardiff Grammar’s View of Language as Program[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 42-48,69.
[5]	XU Guo-li, YONG Zhen. The Review of Lin Tongji's Ideology of National Characters Reform in the Period of Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 98-103.
[6]	XIAO Jian-guo, CHEN Wen-tao. Study on Constructing Noncontentious Procedure of Realizing the Mortgage Right[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 50-54,72.
[7]	XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xue-meng. Analysis of Means of Secret Protection of Civil Evidence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 75-83.
[8]	LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.
[9]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
[10]	KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
[11]	CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
[12]	XIAO Jian-guo, XIE Jun. Research on the Distribution of Burden of Proof to Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 55-61.
[13]	KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.
[14]	XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xiao-li. On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 34-40.
[15]	WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
[16]	SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33.
[17]	XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.
[18]	BI Yu-qian. On Procedure of Saving Evidence from Damage[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 61-67.