Volume 39 Issue 3
Jun.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2023  >  39(3): 320-329
HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
Citation: HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
shu

The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064

  • Department of International Law, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing 100037, China

  • Received Date: 2022-08-18
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-25
    Abstract
  • Wrongful convictions hinder the realization of the goal of justice in criminal trial, which is the negative consequence of judicial operation deviating from justice. By interpreting the deviation and return of judicial justice, it reveals that the failure of substantive justice may occur under any litigation system because of the limitation of lawsuit cognition and evidence judgment, but the obstacles to the realization of procedural justice can be eliminated by means of institutional perfection. In the two typical structures of modern criminal procedure, the United States criminal procedure system is regarded as the classic paradigm of adversary system because of its highly developed due process. However, there are still a large number of wrongful convictions. Exploring the institutional efforts made by the United States in the management of wrongful convictions can provide inspiration on the reform path of reducing judicial injustice in our country. To solve the wrongful conviction cases, it is necessary to rely on the systematized governance method, and build a complete mechanism to find and correct wrongful convictions, so as to relieve the wrongful judgment in a large scale, organized and systematic way. Meanwhile, it is also indispensable to adhere to the “dynamic equilibrium” concept of criminal procedure, and the improvement of criminal procedure system should balance substantive justice and procedural justice, so as to prevent the untimely occurrence of unjust cases.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(34)
  • [1]
    克劳斯·罗科信. 刑事诉讼法[M]. 吴丽琪, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.
    [2]
    林钰雄. 刑事诉讼法（上册 总论编）[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.
    [3]
    张保生. 刑事错案及其纠错制度的证据分析[J]. 中国法学,2013(1):90-102. doi: 10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2013.01.012
    [4]
    特伦斯·安德森, 戴维·舒姆, 威廉·特文宁. 证据分析[M]. 张保生, 朱婷, 张月渡, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
    [5]
    罗斯科·庞德. 通过法律的社会控制[M]. 沈宗灵, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1984.
    [6]
    约翰·罗尔斯. 正义论[M]. 何怀宏, 何怀宏, 廖申白, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1988.
    [7]
    本杰明·N. 卡多佐. 法律科学的悖论[M]. 劳东燕, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
    [8]
    李心鉴. 刑事诉讼构造论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1992.
    [9]
    谷口安平. 程序的正义与诉讼[M]. 王亚新, 刘荣军, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
    [10]
    吉姆·佩特罗, 南希·佩特罗. 冤案何以发生导致冤假错案的八大司法迷信[M]. 苑宁宁, 陈效, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
    [11]
    BEDAU H A & RADELET M L. Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases [J]. Stanford Law Review, 1987, 40(1):21-180. doi: 10.2307/1228828
    [12]
    GROSS S R. Loss of innocence:eyewitness identification and proof of guilt [J]. Journal of Legal Studies, 1987, 16(2):395-454. doi: 10.1086/467836
    [13]
    BORECHARD E M. Convicting the Innocent: Errors of Criminal Justice [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1932.
    [14]
    FRANK J & FRANK B. Not Guilty [M]. New York: Doubleday and Company, 1957.
    [15]
    PIZZI W T. Trials Without Truth: Why Our System of Criminal Trials Has Become an Expensive Failure and What We Need to Do to Rebuild It [M]. New York: New York University Press, 1999.
    [16]
    DAMASKA M R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
    [17]
    MARSHALL L C. The innocence revolution and the death penalty [J]. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2004, 1(2):573-584.
    [18]
    FINDLEY K A. Toward a new paradigm of criminal justice:how the innocence movement merges crime control and due process [J]. Texas Tech Law Review, 2008, 41(1):133-174.
    [19]
    WALPIN G. America’s adversarial and jury systems:more likely to do justice [J]. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2003, 26(1):175-188.
    [20]
    MARQUIS J. The myth of innocence [J]. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2005, 95(2):501-522.
    [21]
    CASSELL P G. Overstating America’s wrongful conviction rate? Reassessing the conventional wisdom about the prevalence of wrongful convictions [J]. Arizona Law Review, 2018, 60(4):815-864.
    [22]
    FINDLEY K A. Adversarial inquisitions:rethinking the search for the truth [J]. New York Law School Law Review, 2011-2012, 56(3):911-941.
    [23]
    BIBAS S. Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial [J]. Harvard Law Review, 2004, 117(8):2464-2547.
    [24]
    冷昊阳. 最高法发司法改革白皮书: 纠冤假错案 严惩老赖[EB/OL]. （2019-02-27）[2022-07-15]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1626600770644842575&wfr=spider&for=pc.
    [25]
    周强. 2020年最高人民法院工作报告[EB/OL]. （2020-06-01）[2022-07-15]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202006/81672e572afa4a7392bfcdb7da997f8f.shtml.
    [26]
    周强. 2021年最高人民法院工作报告[N/OL]. 人民法院报, （2021-03-09）[2022-07-15]. http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-289731.html.
    [27]
    王鹂等. 协同理论视域下高校创新创业教育研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(6):638-644. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.06.008
    [28]
    曹建明. 最高人民检察院工作报告[EB/OL]. （2016-03-13）[2022-07-20]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201603/t20160313_114325.shtml.
    [29]
    梁波. 海南高院: 陈满案是一个痛点[N/OL]. 华西都市报, （2016-03-14）[2022-07-26]. http://hainan.sina.com.cn/news/hnyw/2016-03-14/detail-ifxqhmve9147283.shtml.
    [30]
    张军. 2020年最高人民检察院工作报告[EB/OL]. （2020-06-01）[2022-07-20]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202006/t20200601_463757.shtml.
    [31]
    张军. 2021年最高人民检察院工作报告[EB/OL]. （2021-03-15）[2022-07-20]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/gzbg/202103/t20210315_512731.shtml.
    [32]
    CARDOZO B N. The Growth of the Law [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.
    [33]
    陈瑞华. 刑事诉讼法[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021.
    [34]
    佀化强. 公平、正义的证成及实现路径[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2009,25(1):68-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2009.01.014
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHOU Jie, HU Kun. Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 89-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120
    [2]BIAN Guiping. Distributive Justice in the Construction of Social Public Trust[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 1-9. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100087
    [3]LI Guang-lei, LI Chang-bao. A New Exploration of the Origin of Justice from the Perspective of Stress[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 49-54.
    [4]MA Xiao-yan. What Kind of Justice do We Need?——A Study on I. M.Young's Political Philosophy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 93-98.
    [5]XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 120-126.
    [6]BAI Xiao-feng. Substantial and Procedural Issues on Protection of the Unborn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 70-74.
    [7]SUN Jing-jing. The Saiban-in System and Its Impact on Criminal Justice in Japan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 97-101.
    [8]KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
    [9]CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
    [10]HE Jun-wu. Political Justice: the Dimension of Value of Public Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 34-38.
    [11]SI Hua-qiang. The Foundation and the Enforcement Path of Fairness and Justice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 68-75.
    [12]TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.
    [13]ZHANG Zheng-de, LI Ying. The Relationship between Efficiency and Justice in Economic Analysis Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 78-82,97.
    [14]LIU Dong-gen. Restorative Justice and Its Implication to Our Country's Criminal Justice Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 60-65.
    [15]LI Chao. Establishment of Judiciary Power in Modern China: Reconstruction of Power System and Transplantation of Institution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 19-23.
    [16]XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xiao-li. On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 34-40.
    [17]WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
    [18]XIAO Jian-hua. The Construction of the System of Judicial Assistance between the Main Land and Taiwan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 10-16.
    [19]SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33.
    [20]XIAO Jian-guo, XIAO Jian-guang. Research on the Trial Committee in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 60-66.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 王译萱，刘建宏. 未决羁押功能异化的问题与出路——基于刑事诉讼模式理论与实证数据的分析. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(03): 89-100 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 31.5 %FULLTEXT: 31.5 %META: 62.4 %META: 62.4 %PDF: 6.1 %PDF: 6.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.4 %其他: 8.4 %Canyon Country: 0.2 %Canyon Country: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.2 %Seattle: 0.3 %Seattle: 0.3 %上海: 2.4 %上海: 2.4 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %北京: 3.5 %北京: 3.5 %华盛顿州: 0.2 %华盛顿州: 0.2 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %张家口: 1.0 %张家口: 1.0 %恩施: 0.5 %恩施: 0.5 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 20.1 %芒廷维尤: 20.1 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 48.1 %西宁: 48.1 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %资阳: 0.5 %资阳: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %银川: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %鞍山: 0.7 %鞍山: 0.7 %其他Canyon CountryRochesterSeattle上海东莞丽水北京华盛顿州南京台州合肥哥伦布天津太原宣城常州张家口恩施成都扬州昆明杭州格兰特县武汉温州漯河珠海石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西雅图诺沃克资阳邯郸郑州重庆银川长沙鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (356) PDF downloads(35) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return