BIAN Guiping. Distributive Justice in the Construction of Social Public Trust[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 1-9. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100087
Citation: BIAN Guiping. Distributive Justice in the Construction of Social Public Trust[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 1-9. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100087

Distributive Justice in the Construction of Social Public Trust

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100087
  • Received Date: 2023-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-19
  • Distributive justice, which appeals to equal opportunity and ethical care, is the key to the construction of social public trust in the new era. Public resources are the material premise of public distribution justice, and character is the necessary condition of distribution justice. Distributive justice not only facilitates effective economic-political-social interactions and promotes the reasonable circulation of social trust, but also helps to enhance citizens’ awareness of power and rights. Strengthening the construction of social public trust in distributive justice is to realize that the power is used by the people, feelings are for the people, and the benefits are sought by the people. The practice of distributive justice should not only guard against the absolute equalization of distribution and economization that ignores individual differences, but also eliminate the dependence on status, money or relationship in the process. The ideal distribution is the unity of prioritizing efficiency and taking into account fairness, combining other-regulation and self-regulation in the distribution and development of public resources, and highlighting the principles of development, justice and sharing in the distribution. The rational distribution of public resources depends on the improvement of the ruling party’s cognitive ability, the enhancement of the consciousness of purpose to serve the people, and the awe of the objective laws of society and the people.

     

  • [1]
    康德. 实践理性批判[M]. 李秋零,译. 北京:中国人民出版社,2011.
    [2]
    习近平. 习近平谈治国理政[M]. 北京:外文出版社,2014.
    [3]
    黑格尔. 法哲学原理[M]. 范扬,张企泰,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1979.
    [4]
    习近平. 习近平谈治国理政(第二卷)[M]. 北京:外文出版社,2017.
    [5]
    习近平. 习近平谈治国理政(第三卷)[M]. 北京:外文出版社,2020.
    [6]
    马克思恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第四卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
    [7]
    许慎. 说文解字[M]. 段玉裁,注. 上海:上海古籍出版社,1988.
    [8]
    高清海. 人类正在走向自觉的“类存在”[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报,1998(1):1-12,94.
    [9]
    习近平. 之江新语 [M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007.
    [10]
    习近平. 在全国党校工作会议上的讲话 [M]. 北京:人民出版社,2016.
    [11]
    习近平. 在党史学习教育动员大会上的讲话 [M]. 北京:人民出版社,2021.
    [12]
    吴大娟. 数字技术、精神政治与权力治理的辩证法——韩炳哲数字精神政治思想管窥[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(2):16-23.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]NIU Lina, LU Chunxia, HOU Zhijiang. Ethical Undertones, Generative landscapes, and Ethical Traits of Xi Jinping’s Important Discourses on Scientific and Technological Innovation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 17-23. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024030161
    [2]DAI Rong-li. On the Development of High-speed Railway in China from the Ethical Perspective——-The Reflection of “7.23” High-speed Railway Accident and the Inspiration from Japan, France and Germany[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 51-58.
    [3]HE Jun-wu. Political Justice: the Dimension of Value of Public Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 34-38.
    [4]DUAN Cheng-li. Analyzing Ethic Puzzlement of Political Compromise in Gender View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 154-158.
    [5]SHEN Li, LIU Bin-zhi. Ethics Principles of American Social Work-Historical Experience and Text Explanation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 1-4.
    [6]GUO Wei-hua. The Inspiration and Reaction of Confucian Moral Philosophy for Raising the “Soft Power of Culture”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 169-172.
    [7]WANG Jian. Moral Hazard and Trust Mechanism in Social Health Insurance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 6-9,16.
    [8]LI Xiao-guang. The Ethical Responsibility of Scientists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 151-156.
    [9]ZUO Peng. Christian Ethics and Social Work Value——Starting from the Difficult Position of Social Work Education in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 1-5.
    [10]MI Jing. On the Ethics of Teaching in University[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 136-140.
    [11]XIE Li-sheng. The Ethical Dilemma of Modern Technologies and Moral Relativism in the Age of Technology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 141-146.
    [12]XU Jin-zhong, ZHANG Li-hua. The Reappearance and Criticism on Utilitarianism in Socialist Market Economy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 21-24,34.
    [13]LIU Wen-xia, YAN Feng, SONG Lin. Pondering on the Life Ethic[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(1): 9-13.
    [14]BIAN Xiu-quan, ZHU Teng. On the Weak Ethics and Its Meaning of Roman Family Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 22-25.
    [15]ZHANG Kang-zhi. The Moral Appeals in Administration Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 1-4,16.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.3 %FULLTEXT: 12.3 %META: 83.9 %META: 83.9 %PDF: 3.8 %PDF: 3.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.4 %其他: 7.4 %Rochester: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.2 %三明: 0.3 %三明: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %丽水: 2.9 %丽水: 2.9 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %包头: 0.6 %包头: 0.6 %北京: 2.7 %北京: 2.7 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南平: 0.3 %南平: 0.3 %南昌: 1.5 %南昌: 1.5 %南通: 0.9 %南通: 0.9 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台州: 1.0 %台州: 1.0 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %咸阳: 1.4 %咸阳: 1.4 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 1.4 %嘉兴: 1.4 %大连: 1.6 %大连: 1.6 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %宁德: 0.8 %宁德: 0.8 %宁波: 0.8 %宁波: 0.8 %安庆: 0.3 %安庆: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.6 %宿迁: 0.6 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广元: 0.4 %广元: 0.4 %广安: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %徐州: 1.0 %徐州: 1.0 %得梅因: 0.3 %得梅因: 0.3 %德州: 0.2 %德州: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %抚州: 1.2 %抚州: 1.2 %无锡: 1.0 %无锡: 1.0 %日照: 0.3 %日照: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昌吉: 0.1 %昌吉: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %榆林: 0.6 %榆林: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %氹仔: 0.1 %氹仔: 0.1 %汕头: 0.3 %汕头: 0.3 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %泸州: 0.5 %泸州: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海西: 0.1 %海西: 0.1 %淮北: 0.2 %淮北: 0.2 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 0.5 %淮安: 0.5 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %渭南: 0.4 %渭南: 0.4 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘西: 0.7 %湘西: 0.7 %漯河: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %漳州: 0.7 %漳州: 0.7 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %珠海: 0.6 %珠海: 0.6 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %约翰内斯堡: 0.9 %约翰内斯堡: 0.9 %绍兴: 0.7 %绍兴: 0.7 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %自贡: 0.1 %自贡: 0.1 %舟山: 0.4 %舟山: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 16.2 %芒廷维尤: 16.2 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %荆门: 0.8 %荆门: 0.8 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %营口: 0.5 %营口: 0.5 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 10.9 %西宁: 10.9 %西安: 1.4 %西安: 1.4 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.4 %辽阳: 0.4 %连云港: 0.3 %连云港: 0.3 %通化: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邵阳: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.3 %郑州: 1.0 %郑州: 1.0 %郴州: 1.0 %郴州: 1.0 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 1.3 %重庆: 1.3 %金华: 0.6 %金华: 0.6 %铁岭: 1.4 %铁岭: 1.4 %锦州: 0.5 %锦州: 0.5 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.5 %随州: 0.3 %随州: 0.3 %雅安: 0.6 %雅安: 0.6 %鞍山: 2.3 %鞍山: 2.3 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.2 %鹰潭: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.7 %黄冈: 0.7 %黄南: 0.3 %黄南: 0.3 %黄石: 0.4 %黄石: 0.4 %其他Rochester三明三门峡上海中山丽水六安包头北京十堰华盛顿州南京南平南昌南通厦门台州合肥吉林咸阳哥伦布唐山嘉兴大连天津宁德宁波安庆安康宜春宣城宿迁常州常德平顶山广元广安广州廊坊张家口徐州得梅因德州成都扬州抚州无锡日照昆明昌吉朝阳杭州枣庄榆林武汉氹仔汕头江门池州沈阳泉州泰州泸州洛阳济南济宁海东海西淮北淮南淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湘西漯河漳州潍坊烟台珠海盐城盘锦石家庄福州秦皇岛约翰内斯堡绍兴绵阳自贡舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆州荆门莆田营口襄阳西宁西安西雅图辽阳连云港通化邯郸邵阳郑州郴州鄂州重庆金华铁岭锦州长沙阳泉随州雅安鞍山驻马店鹰潭黄冈黄南黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (961) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return