On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System

XIAO Jian-guo; HUANG Zhong-shun

Volume 28 Issue 1

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2012 > 28(1): 120-126

XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 120-126.

Citation:

XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 120-126.

Citation:

PDF( 308 KB)

On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System

XIAO Jian-guo¹,
HUANG Zhong-shun²

1. School of Law Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
2. Department of Politics and Law Liupanshui Normal College, Liupanshui 553004, China

Received Date: 2011-12-12
Available Online: 2021-06-24

Abstract

Abstract

The setting up of tort liability pattern is the key to the realization of the Tort Liability Act's multiple functions of filling the victim loss, preventing harm from happening again, punishing malicious infringers and protecting the freedom of action.Legislators' construction of Multi-party Tort Liability system in Tort Liability Act is difficult to be implemented in judicial practice because of the lag of supporting theories in the research of procedural law.In interpretation, the application of Statutory Undertaking will be able to adhere to a victim-centered basis, taking into account of the concept of one-time dispute resolution and the protection of the minimum procedural justice of the subjects of Multi-party Tort Liability.
- subjects of tort liability,
- prozessführungsrecht,
- statutory undertaking,
- due procedure

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
[2]	LIU Jinlin. Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 99-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022
[3]	HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
[4]	LIAO Li-huan. The Normative Structure of Preventive Environmental Public Interest Litigation: Taking Article 1 of “The Interpretation of Several Issues on the Application of Law to Civil Public Interest Litigation Cases” as the Center[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 66-73.
[5]	LI Guang-lei, LI Chang-bao. A New Exploration of the Origin of Justice from the Perspective of Stress[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 49-54.
[6]	YANG Guang. The Combination of Rights: The Discussion on the Pre-emptive Right in Limited Liability Company[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 86-93.
[7]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[8]	KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
[9]	TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.
[10]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
[11]	KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64.
[12]	XIAO Jian-guo, XIE Jun. Research on the Distribution of Burden of Proof to Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 55-61.
[13]	DING Xiao-hua. The Doctrine of Liabitlity Fixation about the First Infringer of Intellectral Property Right's Civil Liability[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 38-44.
[14]	KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.
[15]	XIAO Jian-guo. On the Nature and the Effect of Civil Enforcement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 11-18.
[16]	LIAO Yong-an, ZHAO Xiao-wei. The Comparative Study of Civil Expense of Proceeding System between Japan and China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 41-47.
[17]	WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
[18]	LIU Xue-zai. An Analysis of Puzzle of Res Judicata in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 30-35.
[19]	XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.