On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure

XIAO Jian-hua; CHEN Xiao-li

Volume 20 Issue 2

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2004 > 20(2): 34-40

XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xiao-li. On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 34-40.

Citation:

XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xiao-li. On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 34-40.

Citation:

PDF( 989 KB)

On the Double Restrictions of the Civil Retrial Procedure——A Unitary Method of the Reformation of the Civil Retrial Procedure

China University of Politics and Law, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2004-02-19
Available Online: 2021-07-06

Abstract

Abstract

The civil retrial procedure has received fierce criticisms from scholars of our country due to its malpractice in recent years. The reform suggestion of improving retrial procedure standard isn't a permanent cure according to the restriction mechanisms of the retrial procedure. The restriction mechanisms can be divided into internal restriction and external restriction. The former refers to the limitation of the retrial reasons and the legalization of the checkup procedure; the latter refers to a rational trial grade system. The reformation of the civil retrail procedure of our country should adopt a unitary method, that is, to unify the reformations of the trial grade system and legalization of the chechup procedure,starting from the rule of the procedure's self-consolidation.
- civil procedure act,
- retrial procedure,
- internal rest riciton,
- external restricition

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
[2]	HOU Deng-hua, ZHAO Ying-xue. Study on the Discretionary Non-prosecution and the Perfection of Its Supervision and Restriction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 160-166.
[3]	ZHAI Da-yu, XU Yue. The Impact of Negative Externality Power in International Climate Politics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 71-78.
[4]	DING Zi-jiang. Rethinking of the Methodology of Cross-cultural Research[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 46-59.
[5]	ZHAO Lian-wen, FENG Ting-ting. Review on the Research of Power Supervision and Restriction in Recent Years[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(1): 87-92.
[6]	MA Bai-lian. A Comparative Analysis of the Scientific & Technological Innovation Capacity of Our Universities and Research Institutions in Recent Ten Years[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 72-78.
[7]	LIU Xin-hua, LI Chun-hao. Study on the Information Disclosure of Internal Control of the Listed Banks in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 163-167,178.
[8]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[9]	XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xue-meng. Analysis of Means of Secret Protection of Civil Evidence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 75-83.
[10]	CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
[11]	KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
[12]	ZHAO Wei. Problems of Procedure for Judicial Review of Death Sentences and Its improvement Principles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 88-92,111.
[13]	KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64.
[14]	KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.
[15]	XIAO Jian-guo. On the Nature and the Effect of Civil Enforcement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 11-18.
[16]	LIAO Yong-an, ZHAO Xiao-wei. The Comparative Study of Civil Expense of Proceeding System between Japan and China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 41-47.
[17]	LIU Xue-zai. An Analysis of Puzzle of Res Judicata in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 30-35.
[18]	XIAO Yong-bing. On the Selection of the Patterns of Board's Restrictionover Joint-stock Company of Limited Liability[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 42-46.
[19]	SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33.
[20]	BI Yu-qian. On Procedure of Saving Evidence from Damage[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 61-67.