A Study of Foreign Language Teachers’ TPACK Structure

WANG Fei

Jun. 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(1): 112-118

WANG Fei. A Study of Foreign Language Teachers’ TPACK Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 112-118.

Citation:

WANG Fei. A Study of Foreign Language Teachers’ TPACK Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 112-118.

WANG Fei. A Study of Foreign Language Teachers’ TPACK Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 112-118.

Citation:

WANG Fei. A Study of Foreign Language Teachers’ TPACK Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 112-118.

PDF( 551 KB)

A Study of Foreign Language Teachers’ TPACK Structure

WANG Fei

School of Humanities, Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received Date: 2017-09-05
Available Online: 2021-06-01
Publish Date: 2021-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

A survey of 65 college English teachers in Gansu was conducted using TPACK scale developed by Schmidt & Mishra (2009) and Sahin(2011). The results show that the mean score of TPACK falls into medium level with PCK the highest one and TK the lowest one; there is a significant difference between male and female teachers on TK and TCK dimensions; the education background has positive impact on CK, PK and PCK level; there is a positive correlation between the professional title and the four dimensions, CK, PK, TPK and TPACK. Based on the results, this research hopes to provide theoretical and practical guidance.
- TPACK,
- foreign language teachers,
- empirical study

FullText(HTML)

References(26)

References

[1]	Mishra, P. & Kohler, M. J. Teachers learning technology by design[J]. Journal of computing in teacher education, 2005, 21(3):94-102
[2]	Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. Introducing TPCK[A]. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (ed.). The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators[C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008:3-29.
[3]	Mishra, P. & Kohler, M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teachers’ knowledge[J]. Teacher College Record, 2006, 108(6):1017-1054.
[4]	Shulman, L. S. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching[J]. Educational Researcher, 1986, 15(2), 4-14.
[5]	Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. & Yahya, K. Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy and technology[J]. Computer & Education, 2007, (49):740-762.
[6]	Harris, J., Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activities types: curriculun-based technology integration reframed[J]. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2009, 41(4):393-416.
[7]	Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. & Shin, T. S. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): the development and validation of an assessment instrument for perservice teachers[J]. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2009, 42(2): 123-149.
[8]	Margerum-Leys, J. & Marx, R. W. Teacher knowledge of educational technology: a case study of student/mentor teacher pairs[J]. Journal of Educational Educational Computing Research, 2002, 26(4): 427-462.
[9]	Liu, S. H. Exploring the instructional strategies of elementary school teachers when developing technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge via a collaborative professional development program[J]. International Education Studies, 2013, 6(11):58-68.
[10]	Yalcin, A. & Yalcin, N. How to get best result from a presentation? How to increase effectiveness of a presentation[J]. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, (9):480-486.
[11]	焦建利, 钟洪蕊. 技术-教学法-内容知识(TPACK)研究议题及进展[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2010(1):39-45.
[12]	卢强. TPACK视域下职前教师教育模式的重构[J]. 信阳师范学院院报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, 31(1):68-72.
[13]	何克抗. TPACK-“美国信息技术与课程整合”途径与方法研究的新发展(上)[J]. 电化教育研究, 2012, (5):5-10.
[14]	王琦. 外语教师TPACK建构中的思辨思维教学[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2013, 50(4):88-93.
[15]	黄冬明, 高莉娜, 王海燕. 高中教师TPACK现状调查与分析[J]. 现代教育技术, 2013, 23(2):37-51.
[16]	王琦. 外语教师TPACK结构及其技术整合自我效能研究[J]. 外语电化教学, 2014,(4):14-20.
[17]	董艳, 桑国元, 蔡敬新. 师范生TPACK知识的实证研究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2014, 26(3):36-43.
[18]	Sahin, I. Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK)[J]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2011, 10(1):97-105.
[19]	Hüseyin, Ö. Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge[J]. International education studies, 2015, 8(5): 119-130.
[20]	林秀钦, 黄荣怀. 中小学教师信息技术应用的态度与行为调查[J]. 中国电话教育, 2009,(9):17-23.
[21]	王海啸. 大学英语教师与教学情况调查分析[J]. 外语界, 2009,(4): 6-13.
[22]	王守仁,王海啸. 我国高校大学英语教学现状调查及大学英语教学改革与发展方向[J]. 中国外语2011(5): 4-11.
[23]	吴迪, 陈迎, 宋扬. 教师元认知与高校外语教师职业发展[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2009,(6):32-34.
[24]	张婉莉. 从教师反思透视合作学习的教师专业发展路径[J]. 教育研究所与实验, 2015,(5):89-96.
[25]	Hicks, T. Expanding the conversation: a commentary toward revision of Swenson, Rozema, Young, McGrail, and Whitin[J]. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2006, 6(1):46-55.
[26]	Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?[J]. Educational researcher, 2000, 29(1):4-15.