HE Wei, CAO Ren-ren. The Structure and Criticalness of Post-positivism: Comment on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 70-76.
Citation: HE Wei, CAO Ren-ren. The Structure and Criticalness of Post-positivism: Comment on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 70-76.

The Structure and Criticalness of Post-positivism: Comment on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn

  • Received Date: 2018-12-05
    Available Online: 2021-05-24
  • In 1962,Thomas Kuhn strongly demonstrated that scientific progress is a revolutionary history of subversion and reconstruction with The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.In methodology,Kuhn criticized traditional positivism but inherited the principles of logical empiricism,and then constructed post-positivism.In epistemology,Kuhn interpreted the thought of Scientific Revolutions on the whole through post-positivist approach.By distinguishing the relevant terms of post-positivism and citing the Scientific Dispute since the London International Symposium on Philosophy of Science in 1965,the study shows that the textual criticism of the Popper School and Historicism has caused the Kuhn paradigm to be subject to textualism,while the interpretation of Marxist style makes post-positivism return to historical practice,and reveals that the value of Kuhn's Scientific Revolution lies in the philosophical construction of a revolutionary framework for people to think about knowledge development and scientific progress.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Ying-ying. Defining the Leading Factors of Structural Deflation in China—Based on MSVAR Cumulative Impulse Response[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 102-111.
    [2]PANG Nan, YE Ying. Social Prosperity and Political Decline—A Study on Arendt's Criticism of Modernity in the Social Sphere[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 74-79.
    [3]QIAN Zhen-hua, HE Xiao-qing. Polanyi's View on Humanity in Scientific Creativity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 93-97.
    [4]WANG Xiao. On “Subjectivity” of Sun Yat-sen's Socialist Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 172-177.
    [5]SUN Hong-xia, SONG Lin. Heterogeneity Interpretation of “Social Studies of Science” for Science[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 101-107.
    [6]YAN Heng-bin, Jonathan Webster. A Collaborative Cloud-based Tagger for Annotating and Visualizing Functional and Discourse Structures[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 32-36.
    [7]SHI Li-rong, ZHOU Yan-dong, JIANG Zhuo-ye. Analysis of the Consistency of College Student Union's Organization Operational Mechanism with the Value Target[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 56-60.
    [8]YAN Feng. Thought on Marxism Theory of Post-graduates Majoring in Science, Engineering, Agriculture and Health Science[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 149-153,157.
    [9]PENG Zhang-gui, GAO Jun-shan. Structural Dimensions and Cognitive Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 124-126.
    [10]SONG Ke-jun. Disquisition of Cultural Criticism of “After the Journey to the West”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 66-69.
    [11]SONG Lin. Feminism's Conception of Science[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 162-166.
    [12]FAN Zhi-jun. Young Nietzsche's Critique of Cultural Modernity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 162-166.
    [13]ZHANG Ying. Combating Hedonism, Keeping the Advanced Nature of Communists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 1-3,151.
    [14]TONG Meng-hua. An Empirical Study of Value Effect about Liquidity Premium in Shanghai Stock Market[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 26-29.
    [15]SONG Lin, LIU Wen-xia. Creative Thinking in Scientific Discovery[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 153-157.
    [16]WANG Yan-xia. Analysis on the Scientific Character of Literary Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 81-85.
    [17]WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Fuzziness of the WTO Rules[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 21-25.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 喻少如,许柯. 中国特色纪检监察学范畴体系的建构与展开. 廉政文化研究. 2022(03): 16-22+2 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-032025-042025-05020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.0 %FULLTEXT: 10.0 %META: 86.8 %META: 86.8 %PDF: 3.2 %PDF: 3.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.5 %其他: 9.5 %其他: 2.1 %其他: 2.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 1.2 %东莞: 1.2 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台中: 0.1 %台中: 0.1 %台北: 0.5 %台北: 0.5 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %坦帕: 0.1 %坦帕: 0.1 %天津: 2.6 %天津: 2.6 %宣城: 0.8 %宣城: 0.8 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %扬州: 1.6 %扬州: 1.6 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %氹仔: 0.1 %氹仔: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %河池: 0.1 %河池: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %清迈: 0.1 %清迈: 0.1 %温州: 1.4 %温州: 1.4 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 6.2 %漯河: 6.2 %玉林: 0.2 %玉林: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.0 %芒廷维尤: 22.0 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %莫斯科: 0.5 %莫斯科: 0.5 %萨默维尔: 0.2 %萨默维尔: 0.2 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 23.6 %西宁: 23.6 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 7.3 %郑州: 7.3 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长沙: 1.5 %长沙: 1.5 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %首尔特别: 0.2 %首尔特别: 0.2 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %其他其他Seattle上海东莞九江北京十堰南京南昌南通台中台北台州合肥吉安呼和浩特咸阳哥伦布嘉兴坦帕天津宣城常州平顶山广州开封张家口德州扬州新加坡昆明杭州武汉氹仔沈阳河池淄博深圳清迈温州湖州漯河玉林珠海盐城石家庄秦皇岛纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科萨默维尔衡水衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳达州邯郸郑州重庆长沙青岛首尔特别香港黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (898) PDF downloads(36) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return