The Theoretical Analysis of Public Management Standard

HAN Zhi-ming

Volume 23 Issue 2

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2007 > 23(2): 45-50

HAN Zhi-ming. The Theoretical Analysis of Public Management Standard[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 45-50.

Citation:

HAN Zhi-ming. The Theoretical Analysis of Public Management Standard[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 45-50.

HAN Zhi-ming. The Theoretical Analysis of Public Management Standard[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 45-50.

Citation:

HAN Zhi-ming. The Theoretical Analysis of Public Management Standard[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 45-50.

PDF( 286 KB)

The Theoretical Analysis of Public Management Standard

HAN Zhi-ming

School of Public Administration Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China

Received Date: 2007-03-07
Available Online: 2021-07-03

Abstract

Abstract

The standards in public management are mainly divided into technical standard and standard of conduct. Standard can also be classified into strict standard and non-strict standards.Standardization management is an important character of modern organization management, which is characterized by concreteness, and quantization and publicity. The standards in public management are public goods which mainly manifest the minimal requirement and duty to management object and executor.Public management can enhance safety, identity, order and stabilization of social governance; furthermore, it can help to ascertain responsibility. Modem government is the establisher and executor of management standards.
- standard,
- public management,
- rule

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	LIAO Jianqiu, TIAN Bin. Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 94-105. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113
[2]	ZHENG Ye, CHAI Jinlai, WANG Chunping. Exploring the Quality Assurance System of the Master of Public Administration Talent Cultivation in the Context of New Liberal Arts Construction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 58-67. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030098
[3]	LI Man. Research on the Discretion on Irreparable Harm[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 98-105.
[4]	ZHAO Liang. Comparison of Rules and Competition Model and Words and Rules Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.
[5]	GUO Fang, CHEN Xiu-ying. An Insight into Language Transfer in Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Based on Language Game[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 26-31.
[6]	HE Wei, SU Miao. A Study of the Criterion for Distinguishing Simple from Complex Sentences in Modern Mandarin Chinese within the Framework of the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 1-11.
[7]	LI Tong-yu, SUN Yue. The Discussion on the Criterion of Truth and Dialectics of Nature——Commemorating the 35 Anniversary of the Discussion on the Criterion of Truth[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 35-39.
[8]	WU Ka. How Treaty Rules Become Customary International Law: UNCLOS 1982 as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 71-75,85.
[9]	ZHANG Ceng-lian. The Improvement of Teaching Evaluation Methods Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Association Rules[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 165-169.
[10]	TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.
[11]	YANG Bao. Dispute of Ethical Theory and Anti-theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 160-164.
[12]	ZHANG Xiao-ming. Pre-crisis Risk Management and Its Evaluation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 36-40.
[13]	LI Chen-yang. Application of ISO9001:2000 Standards in the Postgraduate Education Quality Management[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 158-162.
[14]	LU Jun, YAN Geng. Public Management in the Prevention and Control of the Bird-Flu[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 49-54.
[16]	HENG Lin. Social Communication Based on Rules:Rule of Law and Rule of Moral——Tradition, Rule and Modernization[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 8-14.
[17]	WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Fuzziness of the WTO Rules[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 21-25.