Volume 40 Issue 1
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIAO Jianqiu, TIAN Bin. Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 94-105. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113
Citation: LIAO Jianqiu, TIAN Bin. Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 94-105. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113

Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113
  • Received Date: 2023-02-28
    Available Online: 2024-01-04
  • Publish Date: 2024-02-25
  • The large-scale, low-cost and hard-to-detect nature of spam infringement determines the need to use a combination of public and private law to regulate its management. The evaluation of its behaviors and the corresponding rights and remedies are also the result of the combined use of criminal, administrative and civil legal tools. Under the framework of collaborative governance, punitive damages are an effective legal tool to supplement the effective governance of spam infringement. The expansion trend, core function and controllable abuse of punitive damages provide institutional advantages for its application to spaminfringement. The amendment of the applicable conditions, the clarification of the principle of proof, the determination of the amount of compensation, the establishment of the punitive damages fund and the optimization of the rules such as group litigation system provide a guarantee for the punitive compensation system to be applicable to large-scale spam infringement.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    威廉·M·兰德斯,理查德·A·波斯纳. 侵权法的经济结构[M]. 王强,杨媛,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
    [2]
    马新彦,邓冰宁. 现代化通信工具大规模侵权惩罚性赔偿制度构建[J]. 求是学刊,2013,40(1):85-95.
    [3]
    张恒山. 论具体权利概念的结构[J]. 中国法学,2021(6):99-119.
    [4]
    陈素素. “无意入镜者”个人信息权益的保护——以公共场所的个人信息权益为视角[J]. 法学杂志,2022,43(1):149-161.
    [5]
    郭红伟. 论网络私人生活安宁权及其保护限度[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2022,25(6):82-95.
    [6]
    王利明. 生活安宁权:一种特殊的隐私权[J]. 中州学刊,2019(7):46-55.
    [7]
    马新彦,黄立嵘. 电信网络运营商强制消费惩罚性赔偿责任的立法论证[J]. 当代法学,2014,28(3):75-83.
    [8]
    曹京徽. 论大规模侵权案件中潜在受害人的救济[J]. 江西社会科学,2020,40(1):200-211.
    [9]
    赵鹏. 惩罚性赔偿的行政法反思[J]. 法学研究,2019,41(1):41-55.
    [10]
    刘银良. 知识产权惩罚性赔偿的比较法考察及其启示[J]. 法学,2022(7):131-148.
    [11]
    孙鹏,杨在会. 个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿制度之构建[J]. 北方法学,2022,16(5):91-107.
    [12]
    朱丹. 知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2016.
    [13]
    黄娅琴. 惩罚性赔偿研究——国家制定法和民族习惯法双重视角下的考察[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2016.
    [14]
    刘超. 《民法典》环境侵权惩罚性赔偿制度之功能剖辨[J]. 政法论丛,2022(1):86-96.
    [15]
    梁志文. 知识产权侵权损害赔偿计算方法的制度重构[J]. 法治研究,2023(2):60-72.
    [16]
    阳建勋. 我国金融机构惩罚性赔偿责任落空的反思与制度完善[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2019,37(5):156-170.
    [17]
    罗曼. 知识产权侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的实践检视与体系完善[J]. 法律适用,2023,491(2):92-101.
    [18]
    李昌凤. 《民法典》时代惩罚性赔偿制度的理论重构与功能实现[J]. 河南社会科学,2022,30(1):81-88.
    [19]
    COLBY T B. Beyond the multiple punishment problem:punitive damages as punishment for individual private wrongs [J]. Minnesota Law Review, 2003, 87(3):583-678.
    [20]
    朱广新. 美国惩罚性赔偿制度探究[J]. 比较法研究,2022(3):152-168.
    [21]
    刘奇英. 公法与私法交融视域下惩罚性赔偿的法律性质及其制度功能[J]. 晋阳学刊,2018(3):129-135.
    [22]
    王利明. 论我国民法典中侵害知识产权惩罚性赔偿的规则[J]. 政治与法律,2019(8):95-105.
    [23]
    杨立新. 《侵权责任法》应对大规模侵权的举措[J]. 法学家,2011(4):65-76,177-178.
    [24]
    肖顺武. 论消费者权益保护法的谦抑性[J]. 法商研究,2019,36(5):147-158.
    [25]
    董文. 民法典编纂视域下的大规模侵权定位[J]. 法学论坛,2020,35(3):89-94.
    [26]
    程建华. 大规模侵权救济思维的塑成——基于惩罚性赔偿制度构建的视角[J]. 国家行政学院学报,2017(2):82-86.
    [27]
    RABE B. The Constitutionality of split-recovery punitive damage statutes:good policy but bad law [J]. Utah Law Review,2008:333.
    [28]
    张新宝,李倩. 惩罚性赔偿的立法选择[J]. 清华法学,2009,3(4):5-20.
    [29]
    赵贝贝. 个人信息私法救济中的“损害赔偿”困境与应对路径[J]. 财经法学,2022,47(5):95-106.
    [30]
    张新宝,岳业鹏. 大规模侵权损害赔偿基金:基本原理与制度构建[J]. 法律科学,2012,30(1):117-129.
    [31]
    张新宝. 设立大规模侵权损害救济(赔偿)基金的制度构想[J]. 法商研究,2010,27(6):23-27.
    [32]
    MESULAM S. Collective rewards and limited punishment:Solving the punitive damages dilemma with class [J]. Columbia Law Review, 2004, 104(4):1114-1149. doi: 10.2307/4099369
    [33]
    范愉. 集团诉讼问题研究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
    [34]
    JEFFRIES J J C. A Comment on the constitutionality of punitive damages [J]. Virginia Law Review, 1986, 72(1):139-158. doi: 10.2307/1072993
    [35]
    SEBOK A J. Punitive Damages:From Myth to Theory [J]. Iowa Law Review, 2007, 92(3):957-1036.
    [36]
    ROBINETTE C J. Peace:public purpose for punitive damages [J]. Charleston Law Review, 2008, 2(2):327-344.
    [37]
    申伟,刘蕾. 论法益的宪法基础——兼及《刑法》分则之检视[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(5):649-659.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (763) PDF downloads(40) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return