Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Farmers’ Behavior Based on CiteSpace Quantitative Analysis

LEI Yang; WANG Shuzhen; ZHANG Fangwen

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090018

Volume 40 Issue 5

Jul. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2024 > 40(5): 108-118

LEI Yang, WANG Shuzhen, ZHANG Fangwen. Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Farmers’ Behavior Based on CiteSpace Quantitative Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 108-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090018

Citation:

LEI Yang, WANG Shuzhen, ZHANG Fangwen. Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Farmers’ Behavior Based on CiteSpace Quantitative Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 108-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090018

Citation:

PDF( 1087 KB)

Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Farmers’ Behavior Based on CiteSpace Quantitative Analysis

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090018

1.
School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
2.
School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

Received Date: 2022-09-05
Publish Date: 2024-07-08

Abstract

Abstract

The behavior of rural households serves as a fundamental starting point for studying agricultural development and formulating agricultural policies. Utilizing literature related to rural household behavior published in CSSCI-source journals as a sample, this article employs the CiteSpace visualization literature analysis software to delve into and organize the basic situation, research hotspots, and evolutionary trends of domestic rural household behavior research. The results indicate an overall upward trend in the quantity of literature related to rural household behavior, along with distinct phase characteristics. The field of rural household behavior research has preliminarily formed a core group of authors, core institutions, and core publications; however, there is room for enhancement in terms of research scale, inter-team collaboration, and sustained attention to issues. The research on rural household behavior can be categorized into four major areas: mainstream, potential, emerging, and marginal. Currently, the most abundant research outcomes are those focusing on the influencing factors of rural household behavior, pro-environmental behavior, financial behavior, and land transfer behavior. In terms of research trends, the highest level of interest is in the study of rural households' environmental regulatory behavior and behavioral intentions. Subsequent research should prioritize the study of rural household production behavior and the transformation of agricultural development patterns it brings about.
- farmer behavior,
- research topic,
- CiteSpace,
- bibliometric analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗[N]. 人民日报,2022-10-26(01).
[2]	刘金海. 农民行为研究:“关系——行为”范式的探讨及发展[J]. 中国农村观察,2018(5):126-142.
[3]	张亚如,张俊飚,张昭. 中国农业技术研究进展——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析[J]. 中国科技论坛,2018(9):113-120.
[4]	孔志国. 国内对外话语体系的研究热点与发展趋势——基于CiteSpace知识图谱分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(4):429-438.
[5]	CHEN C. Science mapping:A systematic review of the literature [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science,2017,2(2):1-40. doi: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
[6]	习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利[N]. 人民日报,2017-10-28(001).
[7]	D. 普赖斯. 小科学·大科学[M]. 宋剑耕,戴振飞,译. 上海:世界科学社,1982.
[8]	刘军. 整体网分析讲义:UCINET软件实用指南[M]. 上海:人民出版,2009.
[9]	陈飞,翟伟娟. 农户行为视角下农地流转诱因及其福利效应研究[J]. 经济研究,2015,50(10):163-177.
[10]	何欣,蒋涛,郭良燕,甘犁. 中国农地流转市场的发展与农户流转农地行为研究——基于2013—2015年29省的农户调查数据[J]. 管理世界,2016(6):79-89.
[11]	刘成武,黄利民. 农地边际化过程中农户土地利用行为变化及其对粮食生产的影响[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(12):2268-2282.
[12]	王竹芹,张秋虹. 农业政策、农户行为与我国粮食安全——基于动态面板模型的实证研究[J]. 云南财经大学学报,2013,29(4):61-69.
[13]	黄珺,顾海英,朱国玮. 中国农户合作行为的博弈分析和现实阐释[J]. 中国软科学,2005(12):60-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2005.12.010
[14]	李道和,郭锦镛. 农户合作行为的博弈分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2008(1):180-185. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2008.01.037
[15]	江丽,郑文博. 我国农地确权制度变迁中“政府—农户”行为的演化博弈分析[J]. 现代经济探讨,2017(8):126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2382.2017.08.016
[16]	刘甜,苏世伟. 三方博弈视角下秸秆产业的政府·企业和农户行为研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2016,44(7):238-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.07.078
[17]	盛锦. 基于政府、农户、企业三方合作博弈的秸秆焚烧管理问题研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(4):48-53,66. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20150407
[18]	侯晶,侯博. 农户订单农业参与行为及其影响因素分析——基于计划行为理论视角[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(1):17-24.
[19]	罗文斌,唐叶枝,张辛欣. 乡村旅游精准扶贫农户参与行为的影响因素分析——基于嵌入性社会结构理论[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(5):24-30,37.
[20]	唐林,罗小锋,黄炎忠,等. 主动参与还是被动选择:农户村域环境治理参与行为及效果差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(7):1747-1756.
[21]	罗必良,郑燕丽. 农户的行为能力与农地流转——基于广东农户问卷的实证分析[J]. 学术研究,2012(7):64-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2012.07.012
[22]	胡新艳,罗必良,王晓海,等. 农户土地产权行为能力对农地流转的影响——基于中国26个省份农户调查分析[J]. 财贸研究,2013,24(5):25-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6260.2013.05.004
[23]	潘世磊,严立冬,屈志光,等. 绿色农业发展中的农户意愿及其行为影响因素研究——基于浙江丽水市农户调查数据的实证[J]. 江西财经大学学报,2018(2):79-89.
[24]	洪名勇,关海霞. 农户土地流转行为及影响因素分析[J]. 经济问题,2012(8):72-77.
[25]	秦建国,吕忠伟,秦建群. 我国西部地区农户借贷行为影响因素的实证研究——基于804户农户调查数据分析[J]. 财经论丛,2011(3):78-84.
[26]	高晶晶,彭超,史清华. 中国化肥高用量与小农户的施肥行为研究——基于1995—2016年全国农村固定观察点数据的发现[J]. 管理世界,2019,35(10):120-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.10.011
[27]	魏欣,李世平,张丛军. 农户施肥行为及其影响因素分析——基于陕西关中地区不同农作物种植户的调研[J]. 农村经济,2018(12):86-92.
[28]	习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[J]. 党建,2022(11):4-28.

Relative Articles

[1]	YANG Qi, GU Mingan. Research on the Effect of Altruistic Legal Acts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 475-485. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090069
[2]	FANG Zhangdong, LI Huaqiang. Context and Prospects of Digital Labor Research[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 583-597. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110024
[3]	MA Haoling, YANG Shuping. Investigating Basic Prospect and Hot Frontier of Research on High-quality Development of Higher Education[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 413-423. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120016
[4]	KONG Zhi-guo. Frontiers and Hot Issues of China’s Discourse System for International Communication in Our Country：Based on the Knowledge Map Analysis of CiteSpace[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 429-438. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050021
[5]	LI Xiao-hua, TANG Qing-ye. A Visualized Overview of Domestic Research on Multimodal Translation: Status Quo, Problems and Suggestions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(5): 534-542.
[6]	DAI Feng-ju, LIU Cheng-yu. A Study of Hotspots and Trends in International Language Policy and Planning Research in the Last Decade: A Visualized Overview Based on the Scopus Database[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 33-42.
[7]	ZHANG Dan-dan, ZHANG Jing-yuan. A Scientometric Review of International and Domestic Metadiscourse Research Using CiteSpace[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 9-16.
[8]	XIAO Li, WANG Jin-yang. Hotspots and Enlightenments of the Study of National Language Capacity of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 1-10.
[9]	CHEN Gong, CHEN Ying. Hongloumeng Translation Studies: the Hotspots,Existing Problems and Reflections[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 104-111.
[10]	BI Xue-cheng. The Focus and Trend of China's Economic History Study Since China's Reform and Opening Up[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(3): 75-81.
[11]	FAN Zhen-qiang, GUO Ya-xin. A Review of the Development of Construction Grammar Studies: A Visualized Analysis Based on Cite Space[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 56-63.
[12]	SUN Ya, LIU Si-yao, CHEN Shuai. The Recent International Advances in Studies of Speech Act Automatic Annotation and Their Implications[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 12-18.
[13]	LIN Mei-zhen. Trends and Frontiers of China's Ecolinguistics Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CNKI Database[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 31-39.
[14]	QIAN Zhen-hua, LIU Jia-hua. Research on the Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in China Based on the Perspective of Scientometrics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(2): 67-79.
[15]	YI Xiu-qing. Transitivity and the Theme of Pursuit: Morrison's Song of Solomon[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 50-55.
[16]	MA Bai-lian, WANG Rui. The Relationships between Natural Dialectics and Political Movement——Based on the Literatures of Natural Dialectics from 1956 to 1966[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 8-12.
[17]	ZHENG Rui-kun, ZHAO Xin. The Legal Definition and Regulation Analysis of the Behavior of Microsoft's “Blank Screen”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 62-65,112.
[18]	QU Guo-zhong, SHAO Jian-hong. The Empirical Study on the Relationship between Consumption Concept and Consumption Behavior[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 29-32,44.
[19]	TIAN Song. An Analysis on the Behavior and Psychology of Civil Science Fans[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 46-52.
[20]	HE Li-ping. Economic Analysis of Charity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 5-11.