ZHOU Jie, HU Kun. Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 89-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120
Citation: ZHOU Jie, HU Kun. Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 89-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120

Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120
  • Received Date: 2023-09-25
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-19
  • In the era of misdemeanor, in the face of the new requirements of the modernization of social governance and the trend of misdemeanor in China’s current crime situation, the criminal justice response to crime has gradually shifted from focusing on ex post facto punishment and deterrence to focusing on ex ante prevention, multi-party collaboration, deepening the source of accurate governance, and multi-pronged measures combining the concepts of “punishment” and “governance”. The concept of combing “treatment” and “governance” has been transformed. “Effective management of crime in accordance with the law and the strengthening of judicial protection of human rights” are the core tasks of criminal justice management in China. In practice, new thinking and new measures have been demonstrated through the implementation of the policy of “fewer arrests, more cautious prosecutions and more prudent detentions” and the application of the policy of “leniency of guilty pleas and penalties” and “community corrections”. Although “community corrections” and other systems have shown new thinking and new behavior in criminal governance, there are also some problems that contradict the requirements of flexible criminal justice governance and need to be solved urgently. In order to respond positively to the people’s new expectations for fairness and justice and to accurately grasp the balance between the “protection of legal interests” and the “safeguarding of human rights” after a large number of misdemeanors have been criminalized, the administration of criminal justice must explicitly take the “people-oriented” approach as the fundamental principle of crime governance. Criminal justice must clearly take “people-centered” as the fundamental value crime governance, and the concept of “leniency, prudence and moderation” throughout the whole process of crime governance.

     

  • [1]
    卢建平. 轻罪时代的犯罪治理方略[J]. 政治与法律,2022(1):51-66.
    [2]
    卢建平,姜瀛. 论犯罪治理的理念革新[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版),2015,21(1):38-43.
    [3]
    张文显. 新时代中国社会治理的理论、制度和实践创新[J]. 法商研究,2020,37(2):3-17.
    [4]
    刘艳红. 刑事一体化视野下少捕慎诉慎押实质出罪机制研究[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2023(1):35-54.
    [5]
    郭晔. 论中国式社会治理现代化[J]. 治理研究,2022,38(3):89-100,127-128.
    [6]
    刘传稿. 轻重犯罪分离治理的体系化建构[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2022(4):12-27.
    [7]
    骆群. 宽容:刑事政策演进中的增量因素[J]. 河北法学,2010,28(4):2-8.
    [8]
    陈正云. 刑法的精神[M]. 北京:中国方正出版社,1999.
    [9]
    汉斯·海因希里·耶塞克,托马斯·魏根特. 德国刑法教科书(总论)[M]. 徐久生,译. 北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
    [10]
    杨楠. 我国轻罪立法的实践与反思——以刑法修正案(十一)为视角[J]. 东方法学,2022(6):126-135.
    [11]
    刘艳红. 积极预防性刑法观的中国实践发展——以《刑法修正案(十一)》为视角的分析[J]. 比较法研究,2021(1):62-75.
    [12]
    刘仁文,钱蕙. 刑法扩张视角下犯罪分层的路径选择[J]. 贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(4):99-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6644.2021.04.006
    [13]
    俞可平. 治理和善治引论[J]. 马克思主义与现实,1999(5):37-41.
    [14]
    龙宗智. 完善认罪认罚从宽制度的关键是控辩平衡[J]. 环球法律评论,2020,42(2):5-22.
    [15]
    汪海燕. 三重悖离:认罪认罚从宽程序中值班律师制度的困境[J]. 法学杂志,2019,40(12):12-23.
    [16]
    胡铭. 刑事辩护全覆盖与值班律师制度的定位及其完善——兼论刑事辩护全覆盖融入监察体制改革[J]. 法治研究,2020(3):60-70.
    [17]
    王迎龙. 值班律师制度研究:实然分析与应然发展[J]. 法学杂志,2018,39(7):109-119.
    [18]
    卞建林,李艳玲. 认罪认罚从宽制度适用中的若干问题[J]. 法治研究,2021(2):18-36.
    [19]
    赵恒. 论从宽的正当性基础[J]. 政治与法律,2017(11):128-140.
    [20]
    王希,刘双阳. 社区矫正精准矫治模式的理论基础与实践展开[J]. 南大法学,2022(5):150-163.
    [21]
    王志远,杜磊. 我国基层社区矫正:问题、根源与本质回归[J]. 甘肃社会科学,2016(6):122-127.
    [22]
    熊贵彬. 犯罪学视角下的矫正社会工作专业性和有效性分析[J]. 浙江工商大学学报,2021(4):126-135.
    [23]
    鲍文强. 认罪认罚案件中的证据开示制度[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2020,28(6):115-127.
    [24]
    肖沛权. 论被追诉人认罪认罚的反悔权[J]. 法商研究,2021,38(4):172-185.
    [25]
    伍光红,蒙科霖. 冲突与纾解:认罪认罚被告人上诉问题研究[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,43(6):107-112.
    [26]
    闫召华. 认罪认罚后“反悔”的保障与规制[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(4):143-159.
    [27]
    卫跃宁,李嘉. 分离与确立:未决羁押制度的反思与重构[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报,2023,38(1):126-136.
    [28]
    王子毅. 降低审前羁押率的影响因素分析与对策研究[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(4):101-124.
    [29]
    王贞会. 审查逮捕社会危险性评估量化模型的原理与建构[J]. 政法论坛,2016,34(2):70-80.
    [30]
    陈光中,路旸. 我国逮捕与羁押制度改革若干问题探讨[J]. 中国法学,2023(5):5-26.
    [31]
    杨帆. 不起诉种类的边界厘定及体系重塑研究[J]. 东方法学,2022(6):136-148.
    [32]
    谢小剑. 少捕慎诉慎押背景下裁量不起诉适用的发展与完善[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2023(1):72-88.
    [33]
    吴君霞,秦宗文. “慎诉”刑事司法政策的实施难题与破解[J]. 湖湘论坛,2022,35(6):64-74.
    [34]
    卞建林. 慎诉的理论展开与制度完善[J]. 法学,2022(10):126-143.
    [35]
    李玉华,李华晨. 合规不起诉考察程序的启动条件——以最高检企业合规典型案例为样本[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(5):563-570.
    [36]
    陈海锋. 我国选择性不起诉制度的反思与超越[J]. 政治与法律,2023(7):111-128.
    [37]
    何显兵. 社区矫正合规模式的制度偏离与匡正[J]. 江西社会科学,2023,43(10):134-144.
    [38]
    杨彩云. 歧视知觉对社区矫正对象社会疏离的影响机制研究——基于身份认同整合和社会支持的中介效应[J]. 浙江工商大学学报,2022(3):127-139.
    [39]
    彭文华. 我国刑法制裁体系的反思与完善[J]. 中国法学,2022(2):124-143.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]SUN Shan. Judicial Application and Theoretical Review of Big Data Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 69-78. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010112
    [2]CHEN Yu, XU Fangdi. Analysis of Criminal Law Doctrine Analysis on the Realization of Incentive Function of Enterprise Corporate[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 798-807. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100076
    [3]HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
    [4]ZHAO Wei-zhong, WEI Yue-ning. On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 706-713. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017
    [5]DUAN Xiao-fang, NIU Si-qi. From Institutional Critique to Institutional Governance: The Theory and Practice of Anti-poverty from the Perspective of the Centennial Founding of the Communist Party of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(4): 347-352.
    [6]QU Shu-yang. Coping with the Younger Age of Crime: From the Perspective of Lowering the Age of Criminal Responsibility[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 282-289.
    [7]CHEN Cheng. Demonstration on Civil Incapacity of Persons in Custody: A Survey Based on Psychology, Legal System and Judicial Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 84-91.
    [8]HOU Deng-hua, LI Shuang. On the Theoretical Bases of Administrative Guidance in Executing Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 81-84,96.
    [9]SUN Jing-jing. The Saiban-in System and Its Impact on Criminal Justice in Japan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 97-101.
    [10]CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
    [11]ZHAO Wei. Study on the Principle of Direct and Verbal Trial and Criminal Witnesses to Testify in Court[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 80-85.
    [12]ZHANG Jian-jun. On the Value Connotation and Its Realization of the Criminal Witness Appearing in Court[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 37-40.
    [13]LIU Dong-gen. Restorative Justice and Its Implication to Our Country's Criminal Justice Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 60-65.
    [14]WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Judicial Activism in WTO Dispute Settlement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 28-36.
    [15]WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
    [16]XIAO Jian-hua. The Construction of the System of Judicial Assistance between the Main Land and Taiwan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 10-16.
    [17]WANG Chao. What Is Witness: Rethinking And Remolding——Based on Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 71-78.
    [18]PENG Bo. The Relationship between the Defend Attorney and Client in Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 68-75.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 陈小彪,锁雨昕. 论轻罪治理的政策面向与多元路径——以行刑反向衔接为视角. 犯罪研究. 2025(01): 43-57 .
    2. 黄小龙. 轻罪时代行政出罪机制的理论塑造. 重庆社会科学. 2024(09): 104-116 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050204060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 25.0 %FULLTEXT: 25.0 %META: 70.9 %META: 70.9 %PDF: 4.0 %PDF: 4.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.6 %其他: 5.6 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %Rochester: 0.9 %Rochester: 0.9 %Seattle: 0.8 %Seattle: 0.8 %三明: 0.2 %三明: 0.2 %三门峡: 0.2 %三门峡: 0.2 %上海: 0.8 %上海: 0.8 %东京: 0.5 %东京: 0.5 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %丽水: 3.0 %丽水: 3.0 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %包头: 0.2 %包头: 0.2 %北京: 3.0 %北京: 3.0 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %南平: 0.5 %南平: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南通: 1.3 %南通: 1.3 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %咸宁: 0.1 %咸宁: 0.1 %咸阳: 1.4 %咸阳: 1.4 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 1.7 %嘉兴: 1.7 %大连: 1.4 %大连: 1.4 %天津: 1.5 %天津: 1.5 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁德: 0.8 %宁德: 0.8 %宁波: 0.7 %宁波: 0.7 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宿迁: 0.8 %宿迁: 0.8 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广元: 0.2 %广元: 0.2 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %张家口: 2.7 %张家口: 2.7 %徐州: 0.8 %徐州: 0.8 %德州: 0.2 %德州: 0.2 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 1.4 %扬州: 1.4 %抚州: 1.1 %抚州: 1.1 %新加坡: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.8 %无锡: 0.8 %日照: 0.4 %日照: 0.4 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %榆林: 0.6 %榆林: 0.6 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.5 %泸州: 0.5 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %淮安: 0.4 %淮安: 0.4 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 1.4 %温州: 1.4 %渭南: 0.6 %渭南: 0.6 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘西: 0.5 %湘西: 0.5 %漯河: 3.6 %漯河: 3.6 %漳州: 0.7 %漳州: 0.7 %澳门: 0.1 %澳门: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.5 %珠海: 0.5 %盐城: 0.5 %盐城: 0.5 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 2.0 %石家庄: 2.0 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.8 %绍兴: 0.8 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %自贡: 0.1 %自贡: 0.1 %舟山: 0.7 %舟山: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 13.8 %芒廷维尤: 13.8 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %荆门: 0.7 %荆门: 0.7 %莆田: 0.4 %莆田: 0.4 %营口: 0.5 %营口: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.5 %襄阳: 0.5 %西宁: 3.8 %西宁: 3.8 %西安: 0.8 %西安: 0.8 %辽阳: 0.5 %辽阳: 0.5 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.2 %邵阳: 0.2 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %郴州: 0.9 %郴州: 0.9 %鄂州: 0.2 %鄂州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %金华: 0.4 %金华: 0.4 %铁岭: 1.3 %铁岭: 1.3 %锦州: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %阳泉: 1.4 %阳泉: 1.4 %随州: 0.3 %随州: 0.3 %雅安: 0.6 %雅安: 0.6 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %鞍山: 2.4 %鞍山: 2.4 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.4 %鹰潭: 0.4 %黄冈: 0.8 %黄冈: 0.8 %黄南: 0.2 %黄南: 0.2 %黄山: 0.2 %黄山: 0.2 %黄石: 0.2 %黄石: 0.2 %其他其他RochesterSeattle三明三门峡上海东京中山丽水六安兰州包头北京十堰南京南平南昌南通厦门台州合肥吉林咸宁咸阳哥伦布唐山嘉兴大连天津太原宁德宁波安康宜春宝鸡宣城宿迁常州常德平顶山广元广州张家口徐州德州成都扬州抚州新加坡无锡日照昆明朝阳杭州枣庄格兰特县桂林榆林武汉汕头池州沈阳泉州泰州泸州济南济宁海东淄博淮北淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湘西漯河漳州澳门烟台珠海盐城盘锦眉山石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴绵阳自贡舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆州荆门莆田营口衡阳襄阳西宁西安辽阳连云港通化邯郸邵阳郑州郴州鄂州重庆金华铁岭锦州长沙阳泉随州雅安青岛鞍山驻马店鹰潭黄冈黄南黄山黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (924) PDF downloads(54) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return