Disciplinary Relevance of Corpus Translation Studies: Categories, Theories and Trends

WANG Yi; ZHANG Rui-e; HAN Ming-li

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090023

Volume 38 Issue 5

Oct. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(5): 552-562

WANG Yi, ZHANG Rui-e, HAN Ming-li. Disciplinary Relevance of Corpus Translation Studies: Categories, Theories and Trends[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 552-562. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090023

Citation:

WANG Yi, ZHANG Rui-e, HAN Ming-li. Disciplinary Relevance of Corpus Translation Studies: Categories, Theories and Trends[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 552-562. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090023

Citation:

PDF( 1712 KB)

Disciplinary Relevance of Corpus Translation Studies: Categories, Theories and Trends

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090023

1.
School of Foreign Languages, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China
2.
School of Languages, Literature and Translation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Received Date: 2021-09-07
Available Online: 2022-10-10
Publish Date: 2022-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

As a comprehensive research paradigm, the integration of Corpus Translation Studies and its relevant disciplines is the driving force for its birth and development. However, in regard to the very few researches that focus on the disciplinary relevance of corpus translation studies, some relevant disciplines are listed without adequate analysis or interpretation. In view of this problem, based on the data of Corpus Translation Studies published in WoS from 1993 to 2021, this paper tries to clarify the main categories, theoretical mechanisms and trends of the disciplinary relevance of corpus translation studies by mapping knowledge domains, combined with WoS discipline classification, citation statistics and Pareto analysis. The research indicates that the disciplinary relevance of Corpus Translation Studies is inherent in its secondary nature and carried out in various levels and dimensions; for the internal relevance, it takes “Translatology-Linguistics” as the main dimension; and for the external relevance, it connects to dozens of boundary disciplines in which Computer Science, Literary and Cultural Studies, Education and Educational Research are the closest related disciplines; on the whole, the relevance is oriented to the humanities and social sciences, showing the trend of diversification, intersection and comprehensiveness.
- corpus translation studies,
- disciplinary relevance,
- mapping knowledge domains,
- quantitative analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(40)

References

[1]	BAKER M. Corpus linguistics and translation studies: implications and applications [C]// BAKER M, FRANCIS G, TOGNINI-BONELLI E, et al. Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1993: 233-250.
[2]	王克非. 语料库翻译学−新研究范式[J]. 中国外语,2006,3(3):8-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9382.2006.03.004
[3]	王克非,黄立波. 语料库翻译学十五年[J]. 中国外语,2008,5(6):9-14.
[4]	LAVIOSA S. Corpus-based Translation Studies: Theory, Findings, Applications [M]. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002.
[5]	CHESTERMAN A. Beyond the particular [C] // MAURANEN A & KUJAMAKI P. Translation Universals: Do They Exist ?. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004: 33-50.
[6]	黄立波,王克非. 语料库翻译学:课题与进展[J]. 外语教学与研究,2011,43(6):911-923,961.
[7]	OLOHAN M. Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies [M]. London: Routledge, 2004.
[8]	胡开宝. 语料库翻译学:内涵与意义[J]. 外国语,2012,35(5):59-70.
[9]	BAKER,M. Corpora in translation studies:an overview and some suggestions for future research [J]. Target, 1995, 7(2):223-243. doi: 10.1075/target.7.2.03bak
[10]	TYMOCZKO M. Computerized corpora and the future of translation studies [J]. Meta:Journal des traducteurs, 1998, 43(4):652-660.
[11]	LAVIOSA S. Corpus-based translation studies:Where does it come from? Where is it going? [J]. Language Matters, 2004, 35(1):6-27. doi: 10.1080/10228190408566201
[12]	OLOHAN M. Technology,translation and society:a constructivist,critical theory approach [J]. Target, 2017, 29(2):264-283. doi: 10.1075/target.29.2.04olo
[13]	SUTTER G D & LEFER M A. On the need for a new research agenda for corpus-based translation studies:a multi-methodological,multifactorial and interdisciplinary approach [J]. Perspectives Studies in Translatology, 2019(1):1-23.
[14]	许明武,赵春龙. 国内语料库翻译学研究的名与实[J]. 上海翻译,2018(4):3-9,94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9358.2018.04.002
[15]	李顺才,邹珊刚. 知识流动机理的三维分析模式[J]. 研究与发展管理,2003,15(2):39-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8308.2003.02.009
[16]	文庭孝,陈书华. 不同学科视野下的知识计量研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2008,31(5):654-658.
[17]	BAKER M & PEREZ-GONZALEZ L. Translation and interpreting [C]// Simpson J. The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge, 2011: 39-52.
[18]	DE SAUSSURE F. Course in General Linguistics [M]. Translated into English by Wade Baskin, New York: Philosophical Library, 1959.
[19]	CHOMSKY N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1965.
[20]	HATIM B & MASON I. Discourse and the Translator [M]. London: Longman Group UK Limited, 1990.
[21]	MUNDAY J. Style and Ideology in Translation: Latin American Writing in English [M]. London & New York: Routledge, 2007.
[22]	吕俊. 建构翻译学的语言学基础[J]. 外语学刊,2004(1):96-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0100.2004.01.017
[23]	GUTT E A. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
[24]	赵彦春. 关联理论对翻译的解释力[J]. 现代外语,1999(3):276-295.
[25]	陈科芳. 基于语用推理机制的翻译过程框架[J]. 中国翻译,2010,31(3):12-16,95.
[26]	HOLMES J. The name and nature of translation studies [C]// Holmes J. Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1972/1988: 66-80.
[27]	ZOHAR E. The position of translated literature within the literary polysystem 1976[C]// VENUTI L. The Translation Studies Reader. London & New York: Routledge, 2000: 192-197.
[28]	TOURY G. In Search of a Theory of Translation [M]. Jerusalem: Academic Press, 1980.
[29]	HERMANS T. The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation [M]. London: Groom Helm, 1985.
[30]	黄立波. 语料库翻译学理论研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2019.
[31]	胡开宝, 朱一凡, 李晓倩. 语料库翻译学[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2018.
[32]	杨自俭. 谈谈翻译科学的学科建设问题[J]. 现代外语,1996(3):26-30,73.
[33]	邢富坤. 邢富坤谈语料库语言学与计算机技术[J]. 语料库语言学,2015,2(2):26-35,115.
[34]	穆雷. 二十年来比较文学的发展对我国翻译学学科建设的影响[J]. 中国比较文学,2005(3):108-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6101.2005.03.015
[35]	段峰. 比较文学与翻译研究[J]. 中外文化与文论,2017(2):9-10. doi: 10.13760/b.cnki.csalt.2017.0035
[36]	谭惠娟. 重新定位,抑或三位一体?−论比较文学、翻译学和文化研究的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006(1):133-141.
[37]	祝智庭. 信息教育展望[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2002.
[38]	王克非,秦洪武. 论平行语料库在翻译教学中的应用[J]. 外语教学与研究,2015,47(5):763-772,801.
[39]	KIRALY D. A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education; Empowerment from Theory to Practice [M]. Manchester: St. Jerome, 2000.
[40]	李颖,冯志伟. 计算语言学的超学科研究[J]. 现代外语,2015,38(3):407-415,439.