Volume 34 Issue 1
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2018  >  34(1): 18-25
SHI Xiao-yun. Contrastive Analysis of Discursive Representations of One Belt One Road Initiative by Foreign Media—A Corpus-based Semantic Prosody Study[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 18-25.
Citation: SHI Xiao-yun. Contrastive Analysis of Discursive Representations of One Belt One Road Initiative by Foreign Media—A Corpus-based Semantic Prosody Study[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 18-25.
shu

Contrastive Analysis of Discursive Representations of One Belt One Road Initiative by Foreign Media—A Corpus-based Semantic Prosody Study

  • School of Liberal Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

  • Received Date: 2017-09-15
    Available Online: 2021-06-01
  • Publish Date: 2021-06-01
    Abstract

  • After President Xi Jinping put forward One Belt One Road Initiative in 2013, there is much media coverage on this issue. This paper, based on the LexisNexis data of The New York Times, The Times of India and The Strait Times during September 2013 to June 2016, within the theoretical framework of semantic prosody and appraisal theory, explores the discursive construction of Belt and Road in the different ideological contexts. Findings demonstrate that the three newspapers represent the same social reality out of different stances and interests. They apply different terms to refer to Yidai Yilu. The Times of India explicitly demonstrates Indian government’s cold attitude, while The New York Times implicitly reveals its negative attitude. Through lexis of positive reaction and valuation, The Straits Times portrays overwhelming support for One Belt One Road Initiative.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(23)
  • [1]
    杨思灵. “一带一路”倡议下中国与沿线国家关系治理及挑战 [J]. 南亚研究, 2015, (2): 15-34.
    [2]
    袁赛男. 构建“一带一路”倡议视域下的新对外话语体系 [J]. 对外传播, 2015, (6): 13-15.
    [3]
    陈杰,徐沛雨. 阿拉伯媒体视域中的“一带一路”——兼谈中国对阿媒体公共外交 [J]. 回族研究, 2015, (3): 119-125.
    [4]
    薛庆国. “一带一路” 倡议在阿拉伯世界的传播:舆情、实践与建议 [J]. 西亚非洲, 2015, (6): 36-52.
    [5]
    龚婷. “一带一路”:国际舆论反应初探及应对建议 [J]. 对外传播, 2015.(3): 24-26.
    [6]
    白贵,欧斯曼·艾诺. 土耳其媒体和社会对“一带一路”的认识 [J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016, (2): 102-106.
    [7]
    郑华,李婧. 美国媒体建构下的中国“一带一路”倡议构想——基于《纽约时报》和《华盛顿邮报》相关报道的分析 [J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2016, (1): 87-96.
    [8]
    王辉,贾文娟.国外媒体看“一带一路” [M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2016.
    [9]
    李晓,李俊久. “一带一路”与中国地缘政治经济战略的重构 [J]. 世界经济与政治, 2015, (10): 30-59.
    [10]
    王卫星. 全球视野下的“一带一路”:风险与挑战 [J]. 人民论坛, 2015, (9): 6-18.
    [11]
    Hardt-Mautner, G. Only connect. Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics [Z/OL]. [2016-5-15]. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf.
    [12]
    Baker, P. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press [J]. Discourse and Society, 2008, 19(3): 273-306.
    [13]
    Martin, J.R. & White, P. R. R. Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.
    [14]
    Firth, J.Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951 [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1957.
    [15]
    Sinclair, J.Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing and the Development of the Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary [M]. London/Glasgow: Collins, 1987.
    [16]
    Sinclair, J.Corpus, Concordance, Collocation [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
    [17]
    Sinclair, J. The search for units of meaning [J]. Textu,, 1996, 9(1): 75-106.
    [18]
    Stubbs, M.Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
    [19]
    Bednarek, M. Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined [J]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2008, 4(2): 119-139.
    [20]
    唐丽萍.美国大报之中国形象的语料库语言学方法辅助下的批评话语分析 [M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2016.
    [21]
    Scott M. Wordsmith Tools, version 5 [CP]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd, 2008.
    [22]
    Swan, M.Practical English Usage [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    [23]
    Wei, N. X. & Li, X. H. Exploring semantic preference and semantic prosody across English and Chinese: their roles for cross-linguistic equivalence [J]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2014, 10(1): 103-138.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HAN Yanfang. Corpus-based Study on the Levels of Multimodal Affordance Transformations: From the Perspective of Context Transfer[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 60-70. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100109
    [2]LIU Lihua, MENG Fanrong. Discourse Representation of China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation in African Media from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 78-88. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110039
    [3]ZHU Yong-hua, ZHU Lei. Identity Construction of Young Medical Workers under the Epidemic[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 51-58. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021040054
    [4]GAO Wei. Research on “Going out” of Chinese Culture from the Perspective of “One Belt and One Road”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 689-695.
    [5]ZHANG Jian-xiu, LI Guo-qing. An Analysis and Discussion on Retranslation of Classics from the Perspective of Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 38-46.
    [6]XU Wen-tao. Discourse Analysis of Feelings in Song Lyrics under the Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 16-22.
    [7]ZHAO Hong-wei, HE Wei. Review of Research on English and Chinese Causatives[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 16-23.
    [8]LU Chao. The Embodied Understanding of Cognitive Construction of Metaphors in News Headlines—on the Chinese and English Media Headlines of the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 86-92.
    [9]YANG Yang. A Contrastive Study of Employment of Engagement Resources between Chinese and English Scientific Research Articles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 34-41.
    [10]YANG Zi. New Trends in the Study of Corpus-based Pragmatics: A Review of Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 26-29.
    [11]WEI Yin-xia. A Contrastive Study of Modal Responsibility in the English Translated Texts of The Analects by Arthur Waley and D. C. Lau[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 28-37.
    [12]LIU Cheng-yu, RAN Qi. Attitudinal Resources in Customers'Remarks in CSC and Their Impacts on Potential Customers'Purchase Decisions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 1-7.
    [13]SONG Fang-cheng. A Combined Functional Approach to Emotive Communication: Drawing on Interpersonal Pragmatics and Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 36-42.
    [14]ZHANG Wei, LI Jing. Appraisal Interpretation of Aesthetic Values in Chinese Ancient Poems: A Case Study of English Translation of Chaitoufeng[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(2): 1-7.
    [15]ZHANG Dan-dan. A Corpus-based Study on Nominalizations in Argumentative Essays of Chinese EFL Learners[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 21-27.
    [16]XIE Shu-nuan. Comparative Study of Grammatical Metaphor in Chinese and Foreign Academic Discourses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 16-20.
    [17]YU Chang-li, LUO Yi. Corpora-based SFL Contrastive Study on English Extended Numeratives and Chinese Numeral + Measure Configuration[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(4): 37-45.
    [18]QIAN Duo-xiu, LUO Yuan. Corpus-based Comparative Study of Moves in the Abstracts of Research Papers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 12-17.
    [19]LIU Yong-hou. Address Variation and Attitudinal Evaluation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 21-26.
    [20]CHENG Wei. Positive Discourse Analysis: Harmonious Attitudinal Prosody——A Study of Chinese Tour Guide Commentary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 113-118.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 张芮宁，胡伟华. 基于自建语料库分析日本主流媒体的西安历史文化形象报道. 新闻知识. 2021(09): 86-90 .
    2. 张露，梁晓波. 美国《防务新闻》网站有关中国防务新闻报道的批评话语分析:基于自建语料库的研究. 外语教育研究. 2020(03): 18-24 .

    Other cited types(15)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.6 %FULLTEXT: 16.6 %META: 75.4 %META: 75.4 %PDF: 8.0 %PDF: 8.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.4 %其他: 10.4 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Keelung: 0.3 %Keelung: 0.3 %Seattle: 0.9 %Seattle: 0.9 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 4.0 %上海: 4.0 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %伦敦: 0.3 %伦敦: 0.3 %兰州: 1.8 %兰州: 1.8 %北京: 3.0 %北京: 3.0 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %台北: 0.6 %台北: 0.6 %台南: 1.5 %台南: 1.5 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉林: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %墨尔本: 0.3 %墨尔本: 0.3 %多伦多: 1.0 %多伦多: 1.0 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %布拉迪斯拉发: 2.1 %布拉迪斯拉发: 2.1 %帕多瓦: 0.2 %帕多瓦: 0.2 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %新奥尔良: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 0.2 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %杭州: 2.4 %杭州: 2.4 %柏林: 0.3 %柏林: 0.3 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %渭南: 0.2 %渭南: 0.2 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 1.3 %漯河: 1.3 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %素叻府: 0.5 %素叻府: 0.5 %罗马: 0.2 %罗马: 0.2 %舟山: 0.7 %舟山: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 18.6 %芒廷维尤: 18.6 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 35.9 %西宁: 35.9 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %其他Central DistrictKeelungSeattle[]上海东莞伦敦兰州北京十堰南京南宁台北台南台州合肥吉林哥伦布嘉兴墨尔本多伦多安康安阳宜昌宣城布拉迪斯拉发帕多瓦广州廊坊开封张家口徐州悉尼成都扬州新奥尔良昆明杭州柏林武汉汕头江门济南淄博深圳温州渭南湛江漯河珠海石家庄素叻府罗马舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳衢州西宁西安邯郸郑州鄂州重庆金华镇江长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (657) PDF downloads(74) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return