LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.
Citation: LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.

Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics

  • Received Date: 2018-01-17
    Available Online: 2021-05-22
  • Ecolinguistics addresses the relationship between language and ecology.Two major approaches have been identified,i.e.Haugenian Approach and Hallidayan Approach.The present study aims to uncover the inheritance and development of Marxist views on language and ecology by the Hallidayan Approach.Among the views are the social nature of language,the relationship between language, matter and consciousness, and linguistic constructivism.Influenced by the “two reconciliations”of Marxist views on ecology,the Hallidayan Approach is also critical of capitalism,which is by nature anti-ecological.The task of a Hallidayan ecolinguist is therefore to uncover“how our ways of meaning affect the impact we have on the environment”.

     

  • [1]
    黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,13(1):1+9

    -12.
    [2]
    Fill, A.Ecolinguistics:states of the art 1998[A].In Fill,A. & Mühlhǖāusler, P.(eds.).The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London:Continuum, 2001:43-53.
    [3]
    黄国文.从系统功能语言学到生态语言学[J].外语教学,2017,38(5):1-7.
    [4]
    严世清.论韩礼德的语言哲学思想[J].外语研究,2002,(2):7-19.
    [5]
    常晨光.系统功能语言学理论与实践的辩证关系——适用语言学探索[J].外语与外语教学,2010,(5):11-14.
    [6]
    何远秀.韩礼德新马克思主义语言研究取向[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016.
    [7]
    乔瑞金.生态文明是可能的“马克思主义与生态文明”国际学术会议综述[J].马克思主义与现实,2007,(6):51-58.
    [8]
    董强.马克思主义生态观研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
    [9]
    《马克思主义基本原理概论》编写组编.马克思主义基本原理概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2015.
    [10]
    李忠尚.第三条道路——“新马克思主义”与中国崛起之真谛[M].北京:人民出版社,2010.
    [11]
    Halliday,M.A.K.The influence of Marxism[A].In Webster, J.J.(ed.).The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Bloomsbury, 2015:94-100.
    [12]
    Martin,J.Interviews with M.A.K.Halliday:Language Turned Back on Himself[C].London and New York:Bloomsbury,2013.
    [13]
    Martin,J.R.Grammar meets genre:reflections on the Sydney School[J].Arts:The Journal of the Sydney University Arts Association, 2000, (22):47-95.
    [14]
    Webster,J.J.Towards a Marxist Linguistics[R].Guangzhou:School of Foreign Languages,Sun Yat-sen University,2011.
    [15]
    Halliday,M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M].London:Arnold,1978.
    [16]
    于晖.语篇体裁结构潜势及其应用[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2001,(1):6-10.
    [17]
    Halliday,M.A.K.Is the grammar neutral?Is the grammarian neutral?[A].In Webster, J.J.(ed.).On Language and Linguistics(Vol.3 in The Collected Worksof M.A.K.Halliday)[C].London:Continuum/Beijing:Peking University Press, 2003/2007:271-292.
    [18]
    张冰.马克思主义与语言哲学,是马克思主义的吗?[J].中国人民大学学报,2013,(6):123-129.
    [19]
    马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1995.
    [20]
    马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第9卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,2009.
    [21]
    Halliday, M.A.K.& Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.Construing Experience through Meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London and New York:Continuum,1999.
    [22]
    何远秀,杨炳钧.韩礼德的马克思主义语言哲学观与方法论[J].东南学术,2014,(5):20-25.
    [23]
    朱永生,严世清.系统功能语言学再思考[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2011.
    [24]
    Halliday,M.A.K.The evolution of a language of science[A].In Webster, J.J.(ed.).Aspects of Language and Learning[C].Berlin /Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,2016:17-34.
    [25]
    Halliday,M.A.K.On the grammar of pain[J].Functions of Language, 1998, 5(1):1-32.
    [26]
    (美)赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人[M].刘继译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
    [27]
    张秀琴.弗洛伊德式阐释与实践唯物主义阐释——马尔库塞与马克思意识形态理论之比较[J].学术界,2005,(6):166-171.
    [28]
    Lemke, J.L.Discourse, dynamics,and social change[J].Cultural Dynamics, 1993, 6(1):243-275.
    [29]
    Halliday,M.A.K.On grammar and grammatics[A].In Hasan, R., Cloran, C.& Butt, D.G.(eds.).Functional Descriptions:Theory and Practice[C].Amsterdam:Benjamins, 1996:1-38.Reprinted in Webster, J.J.(ed.).On Grammar(Vol.1 in The Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday)[M].London:Continuum/Beijing:Peking University Press, 2002/2007:384-417.
    [30]
    辛志英.语法学研究的生态系统范式[J].中国外语,2014,11(1):15-21.
    [31]
    Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990, (6):7-16.
    [32]
    辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J].外语教学,2013,34(3):7-10

    +31.
    [33]
    Halliday,M.A.K.Applied linguistics as an evolving theme[A].In Webster, J.(ed.).Language and Education:Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Continuum, 2007:1-19.
    [34]
    乔瑞金.英国的新马克思主义[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.
    [35]
    马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
    [36]
    王学俭,宫长瑞.马克思、恩格斯“两个和解”思想及其当代价值[J].探索,2010,(1):154-157.
    [37]
    吴巨培.马克思的双重生态忧患及其现实启示——以马克思的异化劳动思想为线索[J].求索,2013,(8):107-109.
    [38]
    王雨辰.反对资本主义的生态学——评西方生态学马克思主义对资本主义社会的生态批判[J].国外社会科学,2008,(1):4-12.
    [39]
    于晖.伯恩斯坦知识结构理论的系统功能语言学解读[J].中国外语,2012,9(6):43-50.
    [40]
    黄国文.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则和方法[J].现代外语,2017,(5):585-595.
    [41]
    何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J].当代修辞学,2018,(5):63-73.
    [42]
    何伟,张瑞杰.生态话语分析模式构建[J].中国外语,2017,14(5):56-64.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]KUANG Zhan, SUN Luo. A Study on Evaluation Resources in Psychiatrist’s Discourse on Diagnosis and Therapy from Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 83-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023010052
    [2]HE Wei, TIAN Yi. A Contrastive Study of Chinese and French International Chinese Language Textbooks from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 65-73. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024040123
    [3]CHENG Shi, WANG Yong. The Concept of Marxism in Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 722-728. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120009
    [4]CHANG Yuan. An Analysis of the State of the Art of Ecolinguistics at Home and Abroad[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 583-591.
    [5]ZHOU Wen-juan. A New Horizon for Ecolinguistics: From Green Grammar to Ecological Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 247-253.
    [6]ZHANG Lan. On the Rationality and Coherence of the Various Paradigms in Ecolinguistics—Based on the “Many” and “One” of Many-worlds Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 26-31.
    [7]HE Wei, Andrew Goatly. Disciplinary Nature of Ecolinguistics and Ecostylistics: An Interview with Professor Andrew Goatly[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 1-7.
    [8]LIU Shu-xin. Ecolinguistics: A Study on Identity Construction of Alibaba Group[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 19-27.
    [9]ZHANG Lan. The Marxist Philosophical Foundation of Ecolinguistics: Anti-logocentrism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 29-37.
    [10]WEI Rong, Stephen Cowley. New Model of Ecolinguistics: Radical Ecolinguistics—An Interview with Professor Stephen Cowley[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 8-12.
    [11]ZHANG Rui-jie. Languaging and Eco-civilization: Towards Consilience with the Life Sciences—Review of The 4th International Conference on Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 17-25.
    [12]HONG Dan, ZENG Lei. A Review of The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 33-37.
    [13]LI Qian. Diachronic Development and Integrative Study on Chinese and Western Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 18-26.
    [14]GAO Ran, LIU Jia-huan. The Diversified Development Trend and Transdisciplinarity of Ecolinguistics: Review of the Second Chinese Strategic Development Symposium on Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 50-55.
    [15]LIU Jia-huan, GAO Ran. The Diversified Development Trend and Transdisciplinarity of Ecolinguistics: The New Ecolinguistic Thinking of Prof.Andrew Goatly and Prof.Stephen Cowley[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 43-49.
    [16]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Ecolinguistic Studies in the International Context[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 1-5.
    [17]LU Jiao-jiao. A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 33-42.
    [18]LIN Mei-zhen. Trends and Frontiers of China's Ecolinguistics Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CNKI Database[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 31-39.
    [19]WEI Rong, HE Wei. The Origin and Evolution of Ecolingusitics: Review of the First Chinese Strategic Development Symposium on Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 38-41.
    [20]LI Mei-xia, SHEN Wei. Ecolinguistics: Origin,Development and Future Orientations[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 8-18.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 施佳芸,邓红华. 生态语言学视角下郴州城区路名调查研究. 汉字文化. 2021(24): 17-18 .
    2. 沈静. “韩礼德模式”的语言观与生态城市的和谐话语建构. 佳木斯职业学院学报. 2020(07): 110-111 .
    3. 李倩. 韩礼德学术思想中国学理之渊承. 广东石油化工学院学报. 2020(05): 23-27 .
    4. 周文娟. 生态哲学观:阐释、建构、融合与拓展. 阴山学刊. 2020(06): 54-59 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.5 %FULLTEXT: 14.5 %META: 79.5 %META: 79.5 %PDF: 6.0 %PDF: 6.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.8 %其他: 8.8 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %San Lorenzo: 0.6 %San Lorenzo: 0.6 %[]: 1.7 %[]: 1.7 %上海: 4.5 %上海: 4.5 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %云浮: 0.4 %云浮: 0.4 %北京: 3.6 %北京: 3.6 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %宜昌: 0.4 %宜昌: 0.4 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %扬州: 1.3 %扬州: 1.3 %新奥尔良: 0.6 %新奥尔良: 0.6 %朝阳: 1.3 %朝阳: 1.3 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %淮安: 0.6 %淮安: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 21.6 %芒廷维尤: 21.6 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 42.9 %西宁: 42.9 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %郑州: 2.1 %郑州: 2.1 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %其他ChinaSan Lorenzo[]上海中山云浮北京十堰南京南昌南阳哥伦布大同天津宜昌宣城平顶山广州扬州新奥尔良朝阳武汉济南淮安漯河珠海石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西安运城邢台郑州重庆银川镇江长春长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (370) PDF downloads(28) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return