LU Jiao-jiao. A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 33-42.
Citation: LU Jiao-jiao. A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 33-42.

A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics

  • Received Date: 2018-06-20
    Available Online: 2021-05-22
  • Through a self-built Sino-German media climate change corpus and the corpus-driven linguistic discourse analysis(LDA),a comparative study of the media discourse of the two countries was conducted.The key topic distributions and the discourse dispute centers are meanwhile explored.The differential construction of climate change discourse and the ecological view reflected by the differences are also discussed,which can be seen as a beneficial exploration of environmental discourse under the perspective of ecological linguistics.

     

  • [1]
    Alexander, R.& Stibbe A.From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J].Language Sciences, 2014, (41):104-110,转引自黄国文,赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J].现代外语, 2017, (5):585-596.
    [2]
    何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论[J].当代修辞学,2018,(5):63-73.
    [3]
    Neverla, I. & Schäfer, M.S.Das Medien-Klima[C].Wiesbaden,2012.
    [4]
    Schäfer, M.S.& Schlichting, I.Media representations of climate change:a meta-analysis of the research field[J].Environmental Communication, 2014, 8(2):142-160.
    [5]
    Eide, E., Kunelius, R. & Kumpu, V.Global Climate-Local Journalisms:A Transnational Study of How Media Make Sense of Climate Summits[C].Global Journalism Research Series, Vol.3, 2010.
    [6]
    蒋晓丽,雷力.中美环境新闻报道中的话语研究——以中美四家报纸“哥本哈根气候变化会议”的报道为例[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2010,31(4):197-200.
    [7]
    王寅.中日报纸气候变化报道新闻框架分析——以《人民日报》和《朝日新闻》为例[J].青年记者,2012,(11):8-9.
    [8]
    纪莉,刘偲.中国都市类报纸气候变化议题的报道框架与关注周期——以《南方都市报》为例[J].社会科学研究, 2013,(5):196-201.
    [9]
    郭小平.西方媒体对中国的环境形象建构——以《纽约时报》“气候变化”风险报道(2000-2009)为例[J].新闻与传播研究,2010, (4):18-30.
    [10]
    袁玥.全球性媒介事件的中西舆论互动与国家形象塑造——以“哥本哈根气候变化会议”为例[J].媒体时代, 2011, (10):52-55.
    [11]
    李晓丹,张增一.对中国报纸关于“气候门”事件的报道的话语分析[J].科学与社会,2017,7(1):95-107.
    [12]
    李璠.基于语料库的中美气候变化新闻报道的批评话语分析[J].新闻研究导刊,2017,(12):59-61.
    [13]
    李彬.福柯话语理论关照下的德语话语语言学的源起与发展[J].德语人文研究,2014,(2):16-22.
    [14]
    田海龙.批评话语分析:阐释、思考、应用[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2014.
    [15]
    Felder, E.Faktizitätsherstellung in Diskursen[C].Die Macht des Deklarativen.Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter,2013.
    [16]
    Felder,E.Pragma-semiotische Textarbeit und der hermeneutische Nutzen von Korpusanalysen für die linguistische Mediendiskursanalyse[A].In Felder, E., Müller, M. &Vogel, F.(eds.).Korpuspragmatik.Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen[C].Berlin/New York:de Gruyter, 2012:115-174.
    [17]
    Felder,E.Kognitive Muster der politischen Sprache.Eine linguistische Untersuchung zur Korrelation zwischen sprachlich gefasster Wirklichkeit und Denkmustern am Beispiel der Reden von Theodor Heussund Konrad Adenauer[M].Frankfurt a.M.:Peter Lang,1995.
    [18]
    IDS.Konnektor[OL].[2017-05-29].http://hypermedia.ids-mannheim.de/call/public/gramwb.ansicht?v_app=g&v_kat=Konnektor.
    [19]
    高志胜.现代汉语让步连词研究综述[J].安徽文学,2008,(9):339-343.
    [20]
    Thomas, A.Kultur und Kulturstandards[A].In Thomas,A., Kinast, E.& Schroll-Machl, S.(eds.).2005:Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kooperation[C].Band 1.Göttingen.2005:19-31.
    [21]
    Liang, Y. & Kammhuber, S.Ostasien:China[A].In Thomas, A., Kammhuber, S. & Schroll-Machl, S.(eds.).2007:Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kooperation[C].Band 2.Göttingen, 2007:171-185.
    [22]
    Köller, W.Perspektivität und Sprache:Zur Struktur von Objektivierungsformen in Bildern,im Denken und in der Sprache[M].Berlin:de Gruyter,2004.
    [23]
    Verursacherprinzip[OL].[2018-05-20].http://www.wissen.de/rechtschreibung/verursacherprinzip.
    [24]
    Verursacherprinzip[OL].[2018-05-10].https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verursacherprinzip.
    [25]
    世界人权宣言[OL].[2018-05-15].http://www.un.org/chinese/hr/issue/udhr.htm.
    [26]
    联合国千年宣言[OL].[2018-05-17].http://www.un.org/chinese/hr/issue/docs/7.PDF.
    [27]
    Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London and New York:Routledge,2015.
    [28]
    黄国文.论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J].外语教学与研究,2017,(6):880-889.
    [29]
    何伟,魏榕.国际生态话语的内涵及研究路向[J].外语研究,2017,(5):18-24.
    [30]
    何伟,魏榕.生态语言学的超学科发展——阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J].外语研究,2018,(2):22-26.
    [31]
    黄国文,陈旸.生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J].外国语文, 2016,32(6):55-61.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Wei, TIAN Yi. A Contrastive Study of Chinese and French International Chinese Language Textbooks from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 65-73. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024040123
    [2]KUANG Zhan, SUN Luo. A Study on Evaluation Resources in Psychiatrist’s Discourse on Diagnosis and Therapy from Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 83-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023010052
    [3]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [4]CHANG Yuan. An Analysis of the State of the Art of Ecolinguistics at Home and Abroad[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 583-591.
    [5]LIU Yan. The Construction of Ecological Features of Environmental Discourse: As Exemplified in the “China Daily News Corpus of Climate Change”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 254-263.
    [6]ZHOU Wen-juan. A New Horizon for Ecolinguistics: From Green Grammar to Ecological Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 247-253.
    [7]ZHANG Lan. The Marxist Philosophical Foundation of Ecolinguistics: Anti-logocentrism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 29-37.
    [8]ZHANG Lan. On the Rationality and Coherence of the Various Paradigms in Ecolinguistics—Based on the “Many” and “One” of Many-worlds Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 26-31.
    [9]HE Wei, Andrew Goatly. Disciplinary Nature of Ecolinguistics and Ecostylistics: An Interview with Professor Andrew Goatly[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 1-7.
    [10]LIU Shu-xin. Ecolinguistics: A Study on Identity Construction of Alibaba Group[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 19-27.
    [11]WEI Rong, Stephen Cowley. New Model of Ecolinguistics: Radical Ecolinguistics—An Interview with Professor Stephen Cowley[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 8-12.
    [12]HONG Dan, ZENG Lei. A Review of The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 33-37.
    [13]ZHENG Hong-lian, WANG Fu-fang. Research Progress and Achievement Review of Environmental Discourse Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 9-16.
    [14]GAO Ran, LIU Jia-huan. The Diversified Development Trend and Transdisciplinarity of Ecolinguistics: Review of the Second Chinese Strategic Development Symposium on Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 50-55.
    [15]LIU Jia-huan, GAO Ran. The Diversified Development Trend and Transdisciplinarity of Ecolinguistics: The New Ecolinguistic Thinking of Prof.Andrew Goatly and Prof.Stephen Cowley[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 43-49.
    [16]LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.
    [17]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Ecolinguistic Studies in the International Context[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 1-5.
    [18]WEI Rong, HE Wei. The Origin and Evolution of Ecolingusitics: Review of the First Chinese Strategic Development Symposium on Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 38-41.
    [19]LI Mei-xia, SHEN Wei. Ecolinguistics: Origin,Development and Future Orientations[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 8-18.
    [20]LIN Mei-zhen. Trends and Frontiers of China's Ecolinguistics Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CNKI Database[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 31-39.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 苏醒. 基于评价理论的环境公益诉讼报道生态话语分析. 上海广播电视研究. 2024(04): 100-107 .
    2. 纪莉,胡湉湉. 讲好中国环境故事:从生物多样性大会的媒介呈现出发. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2023(06): 159-165 .
    3. 胡湉湉,纪莉. 环境报道的责任建构探究——兼论中国式现代化背景下媒体对公众环境参与的影响. 天府新论. 2023(05): 131-139 .
    4. 张慧,林正军,董晓明. 生态语言学观照下气候变化新闻语篇中的态度资源研究. 外语教学理论与实践. 2023(05): 44-54 .
    5. 何伟,高然. 生态语言学学科体系的融合与发展. 国外社会科学. 2020(02): 127-135 .
    6. 李彬. 当代德语话语研究的多层面分析模式. 学海. 2020(06): 93-98 .

    Other cited types(29)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.2 %FULLTEXT: 14.2 %META: 75.7 %META: 75.7 %PDF: 10.0 %PDF: 10.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.8 %其他: 8.8 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %Pathum Thani: 0.6 %Pathum Thani: 0.6 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %临沂: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %俄亥俄: 0.6 %俄亥俄: 0.6 %北京: 5.4 %北京: 5.4 %南京: 1.0 %南京: 1.0 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁波: 0.6 %宁波: 0.6 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 1.3 %新奥尔良: 1.3 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %柏林: 0.4 %柏林: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %烟台: 0.4 %烟台: 0.4 %珠海: 1.3 %珠海: 1.3 %芒廷维尤: 16.9 %芒廷维尤: 16.9 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %西宁: 43.1 %西宁: 43.1 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阜阳: 1.3 %阜阳: 1.3 %雅加达: 0.4 %雅加达: 0.4 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %其他其他ChinaPathum ThaniSan Lorenzo[]上海东莞临沂俄亥俄北京南京台州哥伦布天津太原宁波宣城广州张家口徐州新奥尔良杭州柏林武汉沈阳泰州济南深圳温州湖州漯河烟台珠海芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安连云港邯郸郑州重庆长沙阜阳雅加达青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (361) PDF downloads(48) Cited by(35)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return