The Concept of Marxism in Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics

CHENG Shi; WANG Yong

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120009

Volume 39 Issue 6

Dec. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2023 > 39(6): 722-728

CHENG Shi, WANG Yong. The Concept of Marxism in Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 722-728. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120009

Citation:

CHENG Shi, WANG Yong. The Concept of Marxism in Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 722-728. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120009

Citation:

PDF( 896 KB)

The Concept of Marxism in Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120009

CHENG Shi¹,
WANG Yong²

1.
School of Foreign Languages, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2.
School of Foreign Languages, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received Date: 2022-12-02
Available Online: 2023-10-11
Publish Date: 2023-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

Halliday created Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) with the aim of developing Marxist linguistics. The concept of Marxism in his SFL is underpinned by the concepts of linguistic function, system and materialism. The notion of functionality in SFL reveals Marxist thoughts, which is present in three distinct manifestations: functional variation, functional grammar and metafunction. Halliday’s Marxist view of language system is represented in his delineation of language as a stratified whole system which evolves dynamically. Halliday’s materialist linguistics involves four senses: language as social semiotic, the origin of language, language base and context superstructure, language and social equality. Hallidayan SFL is totally compatible with Marxism.
- Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics,
- the concept of Marxism,
- functional concept,
- systemic concept,
- linguistic materialism

FullText(HTML)

References(44)

References

[1]	刘润清. 西方语言学流派（修订版） [M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2013.
[2]	MARTIN J R. Interviews with M. A. K. Halliday: Language Turned Back on Himself [C]. London, New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.
[3]	何远秀. 韩礼德的新马克思主义语言研究取向 [M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2016.
[4]	王振华,张庆彬. 系统功能语言学的演变:小句之外−J· R· 马丁教授访谈录[J]. 当代外语研究,2013(10):1-12.
[5]	李忠华. 韩礼德的马克思主义语言观[J]. 山东外语教学,2013,34(6):39-43,48.
[6]	常晨光,廖海青. 系统功能语言学理论与实践的辩证关系−适用语言学探索[J]. 外语与外语教学,2010(5):11-14.
[7]	赵清丽,张跃伟. 系统功能语言学中的马克思主义语言哲学观剖析[J]. 渤海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,37(6):80-83.
[8]	何远秀,杨炳钧. 韩礼德的马克思主义语言哲学观与方法论[J]. 东南学术,2014(5):20-25.
[9]	何远秀. 论韩礼德的实践辩证法语言研究思想[J]. 外国语文,2017,33(2):67-72.
[10]	MARTIN J R. Grammar meets genre: reflections on the “Sydney School” [C] // 黄国文, 常晨光, 戴凡（主编）. 功能语言学与适用语言学. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2006: 40-94.
[11]	MARTIN J R. Evolving systemic functional linguistics:beyond the clause [J]. Functional Linguistics, 2014(1):1-24.
[12]	黄国文. M. A. K. Halliday的系统功能语言学理论与生态语言学研究[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报,2018(5):31-40.
[13]	谭欣,黄国文. 作为问题导向理论的适用语言学探究[J]. 外语电化教学,2020(4):46-50,8.
[14]	胡壮麟. 解读韩礼德的Appliable Linguistics[J]. 四川外语学院学报,2007(6):1-6.
[15]	黄国文. 中国系统功能语言学研究40年[J]. 外语教育研究前沿,2019,2(1):13-19,87.
[16]	常晨光. 系统功能语言学的社会符号视角[J]. 当代外语研究,2012(3):18-21,159.
[17]	胡安奇,曾蕾. 系统功能语言学的马克思主义语言哲学性研究[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014,32(2):56-59,65.
[18]	何远秀,董保华. 系统功能语言学中的超语言学观[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(3):153-157.
[19]	张兰. 生态语言学的马克思主义哲学根基:反逻各斯中心主义[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(2):29-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2020.02.004
[20]	HALLIDAY M A K. The influence of Marxism [C] // WEBSTER J. The Bloomsbury Companion to M. A. K. Halliday. London, New York: Bloomsbury, 2015: 94-100.
[21]	王勇,孙亚迪. 语篇分析中的解释[J]. 中国外语,2021(5):35-44.
[22]	HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar （2nd ed.） [M]. London: Arnold.
[23]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集（第1卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[24]	范迎春. 马克思主义哲学的解释世界与改变世界的内在贯通[J]. 青海社会科学,2017(3):44-49.
[25]	韩礼德,何远秀,杨炳钧. 系统功能语言学的马克思主义取向−韩礼德专题访谈录[J]. 当代外语研究,2015(7):1-4,79.
[26]	郝贵生. 马克思“改变世界”的理论功能观的启示[J]. 马克思主义研究,2007(5):53-59.
[27]	贾建芳. 马克思恩格斯的社会和谐思想[J]. 马克思主义研究,2005(3):20-27.
[28]	赵刚. 关于马克思主义民族观的几点再认识[J]. 云南社会科学,2011(4):82-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8691.2011.04.017
[29]	MARTIN J R. Interpersonal meaning:Systemic Functional Linguistics perspectives [J]. Functions of Language, 2018(1):2-19.
[30]	黄国文. 什么是系统功能语言学[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(1):73-89.
[31]	梁雅梦,时禹桐. 从系统语法看系统功能语言学的纵深发展[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(1):99-110.
[32]	HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar （3rd ed.） [M]. London: Arnold, 2004.
[33]	MATTHIESSEN C M I M. The ‘architecture’ of language according to systemic functional theory: developments since the 1970s [C]//HASAN R, MATTHIESSEN C M I M & WEBSTER J. Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective （Volume 2）. London; Oakville: Equinox, 2007: 505-561.
[34]	HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London, New York: Continuum, 1999.
[35]	黄国文,张培佳. 系统功能语言学的性质、特点及发展[J]. 现代外语,2020(5):601-611.
[36]	魏宏森. 坚持系统观念就是坚持辩证唯物主义系统观,就是坚持马克思主义[J]. 系统科学学报,2022,30(1):1-6.
[37]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集（第四十六卷上册）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1979.
[38]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集（第2卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[39]	HALLIDAY M A K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M]. London: Arnold, 1978.
[40]	丁建新. 功能语言学的进化论思想[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2009,32(4):71-76.
[41]	HALLIDAY M A K. Language and the order of nature [C] // WEBSTER J. On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London, New York: Continuum, 2003: 116-138.
[42]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集（第4卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[43]	HALLIDAY M A K. The act of meaning [C] // WEBSTER J. On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London, New York: Continuum, 2003: 375-389.
[44]	李纪才. 马克思、恩格斯的平等观[J]. 社会主义研究,2008(3):5-9.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIANG Ya-meng, SHI Yu-tong. On the Development of Systemic Functional Linguistics from the Perspective of Systemic Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 99-110. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110118
[2]	CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
[3]	CHANG Chenguang, LI Meizi. A Systemic Functional Linguistic Re-interpretation of Modality Types[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 438-445. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030128
[4]	HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
[5]	XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
[6]	GENG Fang, HE Wei. The Integration,Innovation and Development of Functional Linguistics: Review of the First High-end Forum on the Integration and Development of Functional Linguistics and Commemorative Symposium for Prof.M.A.K.Halliday[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 1-8.
[8]	LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.
[13]	HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
[14]	LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
[15]	HU An-qi, WANG Qing-xia. An Overview of Halliday and Hasan's Studies on Basil Bernstein's Code Theory from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(1): 26-32.
[16]	LU Jun, DUAN Xiang-wei. On the Absolute Freedom of Network Behaviour——Analysis of Network Behavior Based on Marxism's View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 88-92.
[17]	GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
[18]	CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
[19]	HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
[20]	HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.