Research on the Regulation of the Exercise of the Right to Unilateral Variation of the Right to Rescind an Administrative Agreement

LI Huixun; ZHAO Meiyu

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020116

Volume 40 Issue 1

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2024 > 40(1): 114-123

LI Huixun, ZHAO Meiyu. Research on the Regulation of the Exercise of the Right to Unilateral Variation of the Right to Rescind an Administrative Agreement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 114-123. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020116

Citation:

LI Huixun, ZHAO Meiyu. Research on the Regulation of the Exercise of the Right to Unilateral Variation of the Right to Rescind an Administrative Agreement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 114-123. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020116

Citation:

PDF( 931 KB)

Research on the Regulation of the Exercise of the Right to Unilateral Variation of the Right to Rescind an Administrative Agreement

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020116

School of Humanities and Law, Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590, China

Received Date: 2023-02-28
Available Online: 2024-01-04
Publish Date: 2024-02-25

Abstract

Abstract

The Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases Concerning Administrative Agreement clarify that the administrative organs have the right to unilaterally change and terminate administrative agreements on the basis of preferential rights. The administrative organ shall exercise the right to unilaterally terminate an administrative agreement on the basis of the concepts of giving priority to the public, balancing public and private interests, and the spirit of contract. Through the analysis of cases in judicial practice, problems such as unclear basis for unilateral change and termination of administrative agreements by administrative organs, non-standard application of procedures, unclear compensation standards, and unclear distinction between the change and termination of civil contracts have been revealed. To rectify these problems, it is necessary to clarify the basis for the exercise of power, standardize the exercise procedures, clarify the compensation methods and standards, and distinguish the right to unilateral change and termination of civil changes.
- administrative agreements,
- the right of administrative priority,
- unilateral variation and termination,
- public interest

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	杨科雄,郭雪. 行政协议法律制度的理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2021.
[2]	王学辉. 行政何以协议:一个概念的检讨与澄清[J]. 求索,2018(2):118-128.
[3]	章程. 论行政协议变更解除权的性质与类型[J]. 中外法学,2021,33(2):465-483.
[4]	潘运华. 习近平法治思想中的“国家治理现代化”法治理念与民法典规范[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(2):208-214.
[5]	严益州. 论行政合同上的情势变更——基于控权论立场[J]. 中外法学,2019,31(6):1511-1530. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4875.2019.06.007
[6]	江必新,梁凤云. 最高人民法院新行政诉讼法司法解释理解与适用[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2015.
[7]	梅扬. 比例原则在给付行政中的适用[J]. 财经法学,2020(4):76-85.
[8]	刘权. 目的正当性与比例原则的重构[J]. 中国法学,2014(4):133-150.
[9]	梅扬. 比例原则在行政协议中的适用[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2021(4):5.
[10]	熊勇先. 论行政机关变更、解除权的行使规则——基于司法裁判立场的考察[J]. 政治与法律,2020(12):84-94.
[11]	陈天昊. 行政协议变更、解除制度的整合与完善[J]. 中国法学,2022(1):158-181.
[12]	张榆. 行政优益权的理论基础与行使规则探析[J]. 法律适用,2022(3):111-120.
[13]	梁凤云. 行政协议案件的审理和判决规则[J]. 国家检察官学报,2015,23(4):27-39,172-173.
[14]	陈洁蕾. 《民法典》情势变更规则的教义学解释[J]. 中国政法大学学报,2022(3):195-211.
[15]	王敬波. 论政府行为作为行政协议诉讼中的不可抗力[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2020,23(4):105-115.
[16]	步兵. 行政契约履行研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2011.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Fuli, LI Luting. Exploring the Path of Super Platform Interconnection from the Perspective of Publicness[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 124-132. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100059
[2]	WANG Zheng. Structured knowledge: Why Theoretical Construction of Public Administration Matters[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 224-232. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110068
[3]	FENG Ying, ZHANG Ming-lei. Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 52-59,67.
[4]	SHEN Jun-qiang. Research on the Administrative Investigation of the Urban Management——Viewing from Beijing Administrative Investigation of Urban Management[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 152-158.
[5]	HOU Deng-hua, LI Shuang. On the Theoretical Bases of Administrative Guidance in Executing Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 81-84,96.
[6]	LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.
[7]	HUO Zhen-yu. The Nature of Administrative Registration[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 48-58,72.
[8]	MO Guang-cai, WANG Wei-peng. The Evolution of Administrative Ecology to Ecological Administration: Insertion of Generational Fair Idea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 66-71.
[9]	YAN De-ru, FENG Ying. What Is Government?—A Premise Analysis of Chinese Government's Reformation and Construction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 58-65.
[10]	WANG Shu-zhen, HUANG An-ming. Official Utility and Government Administrative Efficiency[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 51-55.
[11]	XU Yu-zhen, WANG Long-jun. The Restriction of Private Interest to Administration Power[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 38-43.
[12]	FENG Xiao-qing. Research on the Duration of Copyright Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 63-69.
[13]	LI Wen-liang. Contract: the Basis of the Ethic Relationship in Public Administration in the West[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 18-20.
[14]	MA Zhen-qing, MA Yun-peng. The Driving Force of the Performance Evaluation of Government Organization in Public Administrative Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 4-8.
[15]	DENG Lie. On the Legal Foundation of International Administrative Tribunals[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 36-41,46.
[16]	LI Zhen-hua. On the Legal Aspects of Administrative Monopoly[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 67-70.
[17]	WU Qun-fang. Theory of Public Choice and Marketization of Public Service——Theoretical Background of Western Administrative Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 60-64.
[18]	ZHANG Kang-zhi. The Moral Appeals in Administration Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 1-4,16.