WANG Zheng. Structured knowledge: Why Theoretical Construction of Public Administration Matters[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 224-232. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110068
Citation: WANG Zheng. Structured knowledge: Why Theoretical Construction of Public Administration Matters[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 224-232. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110068

Structured knowledge: Why Theoretical Construction of Public Administration Matters

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110068
  • Received Date: 2022-10-15
  • Publish Date: 2023-04-25
  • Rethinking the significance of theory to the study of administrative science can provide a possible path to produce experience-oriented administrative theory, and promote the knowledge growth in the study of administrative science. For the study of administration, the theory can deepen the understanding for the government and its behavior connotation, and provide the dynamic explanation for government reform and social change. Furthermore, it can influence the government’s judgment on the meaning of the value by establishing and revising the normative value, and sequentially promote the public order. At present, the development of administrative theory is hindered by such problems as insufficient research on government ontology, method overriding problem awareness, and the structuralization degree of knowledge production. It is thus necessary to set up standard research thinking, which includes establishing the sense of shuttle between the experience world and theory, cultivating the standardized structured knowledge production thinking from concept, proposition to theory, and exploring the general administrative knowledge hidden behind specific situations.

     

  • [1]
    颜昌武. 公共行政学是一门科学吗?[J]. 中国行政管理,2020(4):64-69. doi: 10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2020.04.10
    [2]
    周志忍. 公共行政学发展绕不开的几个问题[J]. 公共行政评论,2013,6(2):1-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2486.2013.02.001
    [3]
    杨立华. 中国公共管理学的危机与出路:恢复重建三十年后的反思[J]. 行政论坛,2019,26(5):74-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2019.05.011
    [4]
    张成福. 变革时代的中国公共行政学:发展与前景[J]. 中国行政管理,2008(9):8-13. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2008.09.003
    [5]
    马骏. 中国公共行政学研究的反思:面对问题的勇气[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):73-76.
    [6]
    何艳玲. 危机与重建:对我国行政学研究的进一步反思[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2007(4):12-15.
    [7]
    何艳玲,张雪帆. 危机即新纪元:基于本体论反思的公共行政理论重构[J]. 政治学研究,2019(5):82-96.
    [8]
    何艳玲. 好研究是当下公共管理研究的大问题——兼论“中国”作为方法论[J]. 中国行政管理: 2020(4): 56-63.
    [9]
    荣敬本, 崔之元, 王栓正, 等. 从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变 县乡两级政治体制改革[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 1998.
    [10]
    杨雪冬. 压力型体制:一个概念的简明史[J]. 社会科学,2012(11):4-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2012.11.001
    [11]
    欧阳静. 压力型体制与乡镇的策略主义逻辑[J]. 经济社会体制比较,2011(3):116-122.
    [12]
    赵玉林,任莹,周悦. 指尖上的形式主义:压力型体制下的基层数字治理−基于30个案例的经验分析[J]. 电子政务,2020(3):100-109. doi: 10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2020.03.011
    [13]
    TSAI L L. Solidary groups,informal accountability,and local public goods provision in rural China [J]. The American Political Science Review, 2007, 101(2):355-372. doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070153
    [14]
    THACHER D. The normative case study [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2006, 111(6):1631-1676. doi: 10.1086/499913
    [15]
    杨立华. 公共管理学学科边界的层次、类型和一个新学科发展纲领[J]. 中国行政管理,2020(4):70-80. doi: 10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2020.04.11
    [16]
    何艳玲. “法律脱嵌治理”:中国式邻避纠纷的制度成因及治理[J]. 中国法学,2022(4):213-231. doi: 10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.20220721.010
    [17]
    张静. 案例分析的目标:从故事到知识[J]. 中国社会科学,2018(8):126-142.
    [18]
    C. 赖特. 米尔斯. 社会学的想象力[M]. 陈强, 张永强, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知 三联书店, 2021.
    [19]
    黄宗智. 建立前瞻性的实践社会科学研究:从实质主义理论的一个重要缺点谈起[J]. 开放时代,2020(1):34-48,5-6.
    [20]
    赵吉. 国内政治学研究的学术态势与际遇−基于“政治学人”平台学术转载情况的分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(6):37-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2020.06.006
    [21]
    庞楠,叶颖. 社会的兴盛与政治的衰退:阿伦特对社会领域的现代性批判[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(6):74-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2019.06.009
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHOU Jin-you. A Contrastive Study of Disciplinary Knowledge-building from the Perspective of Multimodality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 685-694. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100079
    [2]GUO De-xia, QU Shao-wei. Technical Knowledge: The Core of the Professional Development of Engineering Teachers in Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 227-232.
    [3]MIAO Ning. Discourse Epistemics: An Integrated Study of Discourse and Knowledge[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 132-137.
    [4]WANG Zhi-juan, PENG Xuan-wei. Knowledge Representation: Past Review and Present Prospect[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(5): 526-533.
    [5]LIN Yu-ling, CAO Jian-bo. Virtue Epistemology's Response to Three Main Problems of Generic Reliabilism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 186-192.
    [6]TIAN Yuan. The Proletarian Literary from 1927 to 1929 and the Theory Construction of the People-oriented Standpoint[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(4): 405-412.
    [7]SUN Jia-jia, DU Bing. Research on the Construction of Ideological and Political System of Communication Principle Course from the Perspective of Genera System Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 112-118.
    [8]ZHAO Ji. The Academic Situation and Opportunities of Chinese Political Science Research: Based On the Analysis of Academic Reprint on the Platform of “Zhengzhixueren”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 37-42.
    [9]LIN Yun-qing. Noun Phrases, Objects and the Organization of Knowledge[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 14-19.
    [10]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [11]WU Ka. How Treaty Rules Become Customary International Law: UNCLOS 1982 as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 71-75,85.
    [12]DING Xiao-hua. The Doctrine of Liabitlity Fixation about the First Infringer of Intellectral Property Right's Civil Liability[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 38-44.
    [13]MA Bao-bin, LI Guang-hui. The Middle-level Studies of Administration: Seeking an Intermediary between Theory and Reality.[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 17-21,113.
    [14]WANG Lie-sheng. A Study on the Posture in the Modern Progression of the Knowledge Integrity of Marxism Literature[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 1-6,29.
    [15]YANG Yan-ping. A Study of Estimate System for College Students'General Creativity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 88-91.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 刘晗瑞. 基于CiteSpace的国内电子政务研究热点及趋势预测可视化分析. 现代信息科技. 2024(04): 88-91+96 .
    2. 张涵畅. “对分课堂”教学模式在高校公共行政学课程中的应用刍探. 成才之路. 2024(13): 21-24 .
    3. 武廷会,赵守飞. “软硬兼施”:村规民约在危机情境中的韧性治理功能. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(05): 607-615 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 43.5 %FULLTEXT: 43.5 %META: 51.3 %META: 51.3 %PDF: 5.2 %PDF: 5.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.7 %其他: 8.7 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %上海: 1.3 %上海: 1.3 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %十堰: 1.3 %十堰: 1.3 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宣城: 1.5 %宣城: 1.5 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.7 %平顶山: 0.7 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %新奥尔良: 1.1 %新奥尔良: 1.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %温州: 1.4 %温州: 1.4 %漯河: 4.6 %漯河: 4.6 %澳门: 0.1 %澳门: 0.1 %珠海: 0.6 %珠海: 0.6 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 25.1 %芒廷维尤: 25.1 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %营口: 0.1 %营口: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.4 %蚌埠: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.4 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 35.8 %西宁: 35.8 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %金边: 0.1 %金边: 0.1 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %其他Canyon Country上海东莞北京十堰南京南昌南通台州呼和浩特哥伦布唐山大连天津宁波宣城常州常德平顶山广州张家口扬州新奥尔良昆明杭州温州漯河澳门珠海盐城石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥营口蚌埠衡阳襄阳西宁西安邯郸郑州金边长沙马鞍山黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (365) PDF downloads(37) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return