the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs

LI Xian-wei

Volume 26 Issue 2

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2010 > 26(2): 77-83

LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.

Citation:

LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.

LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.

Citation:

LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.

PDF( 309 KB)

the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs

LI Xian-wei

Law School Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received Date: 2010-05-05
Available Online: 2021-06-26

Abstract

Abstract

The Power of Administrative Adjudication played an important part in settling civil disputes which is gradually replaced by the Power of Civil Adjudication. Because the number of civil cases increases sharply and the contents of civil cases are becoming more complicated, academic and judicial circles increasingly recongnize the limitation of the Power of Civil Adjudication and the importance of the Power of Administrative Adjudication. The supreme People's Court's judicial interpretations of the ADRs which is very important will enlarge the scope of the Power of Administrative Adjudication and narrow the scope of the Power of Civil Adjudication. Research on relation between the Power of Administrative Adjudication and the Power of Civil Adjudication may play a fundamental role in constructing a system of ADR.
- civil disputes,
- the Power of Civil Adjudication,
- the Power of Administrative Adjudication

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
[2]	QIAO Fang-e, WANG Facai. The “Trial Restraint Effect” of Civil Self-Admission from the Perspective of Argumentalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 789-797. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070071
[3]	RAN Bo. From the Perspective of “Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation” Re-discussion on the Effect of Preclusion of the Self-admission System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 177-185.
[4]	ZHANG Wei-ying, XIAO Xin. Do Anonymous Investors Have the Rights of Inspecting Account Books?——Legal Thinking of a Stake Dispute's Judgement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(6): 94-99.
[5]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[6]	XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xue-meng. Analysis of Means of Secret Protection of Civil Evidence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 75-83.
[7]	XIAO Jian-hua, ZHOU Wei. On Theoretical System of Distribution of Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 46-51.
[8]	KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64.
[9]	KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.
[10]	XIAO Jian-guo. On the Nature and the Effect of Civil Enforcement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 11-18.
[11]	LIAO Yong-an, ZHAO Xiao-wei. The Comparative Study of Civil Expense of Proceeding System between Japan and China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 41-47.
[12]	MA Liu-ying. On Amelioration of the System of Civil Witness in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 87-90.
[13]	LI Chao. Establishment of Judiciary Power in Modern China: Reconstruction of Power System and Transplantation of Institution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 19-23.
[14]	LIU Xue-zai. An Analysis of Puzzle of Res Judicata in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 30-35.
[15]	ZHENG Xian-wen. A Elementary Study of the Civil Law concerning Foreign Affairs in Tang Dynasty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 24-29.
[16]	SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33.
[17]	SHAO Ming. Research on the Civil Suit[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 13-19.
[18]	MAO Ling. Research on the Civil jurisdiction system[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 26-32.