The Dilemma, Challenge and Countermeasures of Felony Prosecution in China under the View of Overall National Security

LI Lanying; LAI Junhong

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020076

Volume 39 Issue 3

Jun. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2023 > 39(3): 299-309

LI Lanying, LAI Junhong. The Dilemma, Challenge and Countermeasures of Felony Prosecution in China under the View of Overall National Security[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 299-309. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020076

Citation:

LI Lanying, LAI Junhong. The Dilemma, Challenge and Countermeasures of Felony Prosecution in China under the View of Overall National Security[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 299-309. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020076

Citation:

PDF( 980 KB)

The Dilemma, Challenge and Countermeasures of Felony Prosecution in China under the View of Overall National Security

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020076

School of Law, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Received Date: 2023-02-21
Publish Date: 2023-06-25

Abstract

Abstract

Under the background of the new era, China’s felony prosecutorial work has ushered in opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, felony prosecution is an important way to safeguard our national security, especially political security. On the other hand, in the judicial practice, the procuratorial work of felony faces some difficulties, such as unclear premise of substantive law, limited scope of applicable cases, high difficulty in proving some cases and unclear operation mechanism of felony consultation. It also faces many challenges brought by the change of the background of criminal law governance in the risk society, the expansion of the object of protection in the context of criminal substantive law, the tension of value relationship in the dimension of criminal procedure law and the network of crime scenes. In order to respond to the requirements of the balance between the value of security guarantee and the value of freedom protection put forward by the overall concept of national security in the criminal field. The response ideas of felony prosecution in the new era should start from the two aspects of theoretical paradigm and practical path, and combine the guiding concept, the aspect of substantive law, the aspect of procedural law, and the four aspects of case handling mechanism. Thus can we really promote the modernization of our felony procuratorial business.
- criminal integration,
- felony,
- overall national security concept,
- leniency system of admission of guilt,
- criminal prosecution

FullText(HTML)

References(40)

References

[1]	苗生明. 新时代检察权的定位、特征与发展趋向[J]. 中国法学,2019(6):224-240.
[2]	牛正浩,潘剑锋. 论检察机关化解政治安全风险的维度[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报,2021(4):47-62.
[3]	最高人民检察院工作报告——2022年3月8日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第五次会议上[EB/OL]. 最高人民检察院网站, （2022-3-15）[2022-9-12]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/gzbg/202203/t20220315_549267.shtml.
[4]	元明,蔡燕南,李润华. 关于重罪检察工作的几个问题[J]. 人民检察,2019(Z1):125-134.
[5]	周新. 重罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J]. 比较法研究,2021(4):38-52.
[6]	李凤梅. 释义学视域下危害国家安全犯罪问题研究[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2020,43(5):64-74.
[7]	梅传强,董为. 总体国家安全观视角下我国间谍罪立法问题检视与修正建议[J]. 社会科学家,2020(9):104-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3240.2020.09.017
[8]	江奥立. 重大刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度的适用困境和解决路径[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,44(3):320-327.
[9]	张忠平,吴辰凯. 重罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J]. 犯罪研究,2022(5):89-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1130.2022.05.007
[10]	韩轶. 认罪认罚案件中的控审冲突及其调和[J]. 法商研究,2021,38(2):44-57.
[11]	高铭暄,孙道萃. 预防性刑法观及其教义学思考[J]. 中国法学,2018(1):166-189.
[12]	彭文华,傅亮. 习近平法治思想引领下的中国刑法学新理念[J]. 青少年犯罪问题,2022(1):16-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1509.2022.01.002
[13]	左卫民. 认罪认罚何以从宽:误区与正解−反思效率优先的改革主张[J]. 法学研究,2017,39(3):160-175.
[14]	吴思远. 我国重罪协商的障碍、困境及重构−以“权力—权利交互说”为理论线索[J]. 法学,2019(11):54-67.
[15]	汪海燕. 重罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽程序问题研究[J]. 中外法学,2020,32(5):1187-1210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4875.2020.05.004
[16]	李兰英,魏瀚申. 网络金融视阈下单位犯罪理论的反思与出路[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,75(3):172-184.
[17]	田刚. 我国恐怖主义犯罪的实证分析和未来刑法之应对[J]. 法商研究,2015,32(5):34-44.
[18]	最高检: 毒品犯罪呈现“互联网+物流”等特点. [EB/OL]. 铜陵市郊区人民检察院网站, （2020-6-30）[2022-3-15]. http://www.tonglingjq.jcy.gov.cn/zyaj/202006/t20200630_2865171.shtml
[19]	莫洪宪. 毒品犯罪的挑战与刑法的回应[J]. 政治与法律,2012(10):79-88.
[20]	劳东燕. 网络时代刑法体系的功能化走向[J]. 中国法律评论,2020(2):101-114.
[21]	郑旭涛. 总体国家安全观:新时代中国国家治理的重要指导思想[J]. 学习与探索,2020(1):44-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-462X.2020.01.008
[22]	虞文梁. 论国家安全法治中刑法基本价值冲突与平衡[J]. 东方法学,2022(5):189-200.
[23]	储槐植. 建立刑事一体化思想[J]. 中外法学,1989(1):3-8.
[24]	高铭暄,孙道萃. 总体国家安全观下的中国刑法之路[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,23(2):59-67,147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-511X.2021.02.009
[25]	李阳. 中共中央印发《关于新形势下加强政法队伍建设的意见》[N]. 人民日报, 2017-01-19（01）.
[26]	王佩连. 习近平总书记政法工作重要论述研究[J]. 福建警察学院学报,2019,33(5):1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4853.2019.05.001
[27]	李正新. 总体国家安全观的刑法实践理性思考[J]. 政法论丛,2021(6):135-146.
[28]	庄永廉,卞建林,黄卫平,等. 重罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽制度的要点把握[J]. 人民检察,2021(9):37-44.
[29]	黄辰. 涉违禁品财产犯罪的刑法教义学研究[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2021,24(5):180-192.
[30]	张凯. 法益嬗变的困境与坚守[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2017(2):3-23.
[31]	凌萍萍,焦冶. 我国刑事立法中的轻罪标准设置研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2019,40(1):86-90.
[32]	何群,储槐植. 认罪认罚从宽制度的实体法解读:从刑事一体化的视角[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,38(6):91-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-433X.2018.06.020
[33]	徐伟功. 法律选择中的意思自治原则在我国的运用[J]. 法学,2013(9):24-34.
[34]	彭文华. 刑法视野下认罪认罚从宽制度的理解与运用[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2018,33(6):38-56.
[35]	最高检: 推进量刑建议工作精准化规范化智能化[EB/OL]. 法律咨询网, （2019-05-05）[2022-3-22]. http://m.dyzxw.org/?act=a&aid=221144&cid=1.
[36]	孙长永,田文军. 认罪认罚案件量刑建议机制实证研究−以A市两级法院适用认罪认罚从宽制度审结的案件为样本[J]. 西南政法大学学报,2021,23(5):3-16.
[37]	熊秋红. 比较法视野下的认罪认罚从宽制度−兼论刑事诉讼“第四范式”[J]. 比较法研究,2019(5):80-101.
[38]	王瑞君,翟宇航. 量刑建议的文本解读及规范适用研究−基于91份规范性文件的分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37((2):167-176.
[39]	王迎龙. 认罪认罚从宽制度中的控审构造[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(6):67-85.
[40]	陈历文. 刑法立法观之争的反思与出路[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(3):346-352.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHOU Jie, HU Kun. Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 89-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120
[2]	CHEN Yu, XU Fangdi. Analysis of Criminal Law Doctrine Analysis on the Realization of Incentive Function of Enterprise Corporate[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 798-807. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100076
[3]	HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
[4]	ZHAO Wei-zhong, WEI Yue-ning. On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 706-713. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017
[5]	QU Shu-yang. Coping with the Younger Age of Crime: From the Perspective of Lowering the Age of Criminal Responsibility[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 282-289.
[6]	WANG Rui-jun, ZHAI Yu-hang. On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 167-176.
[7]	WANG Rui-jun, CHEN Yu-heng. Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 78-88.
[8]	HE Wei, ZHENG Yu-dong, HE Zhi-wei, GUAN Yue-ping. The Exploration and Practice of “Four in One” Research-based Teaching Innovation Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 57-62.
[9]	QIAN Zhen-hua, HE Xiao-qing. On the Issues of Integration of Industry, University and Research—An Analysis Based on “Transport 10”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 107-114.
[10]	SUN Jing-jing. The Saiban-in System and Its Impact on Criminal Justice in Japan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 97-101.
[11]	ZHANG Xiao-ming, LIU Hui-ling. The Reform and Reconstruction of Administrative Regionalization in the Process of Regional Economic Integration——the Yangtze River Delta Region as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 36-43.
[12]	ZHU Jin, WANG Guang-hou. On ASEAN's Integration in Post-Cold War Era[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 38-42,80.
[13]	ZHAO Wei. Study on the Principle of Direct and Verbal Trial and Criminal Witnesses to Testify in Court[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 80-85.
[14]	WANG Guang-hou, ZHU Jin, LIN Hong-an. On the Development of ASEAN's Integration and Sino-ASEAN Relationship[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 72-77.
[15]	ZHANG Jian-jun. On the Value Connotation and Its Realization of the Criminal Witness Appearing in Court[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 37-40.
[16]	LIU Dong-gen. Restorative Justice and Its Implication to Our Country's Criminal Justice Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 60-65.
[17]	WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
[18]	WANG Chao. What Is Witness: Rethinking And Remolding——Based on Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 71-78.
[19]	PENG Bo. The Relationship between the Defend Attorney and Client in Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 68-75.
[20]	LIN Bo-hai. The Building of the State Security System of China in 21th Century[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(3): 1-4.