Volume 36 Issue 3
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2020  >  36(3): 78-88
WANG Rui-jun, CHEN Yu-heng. Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 78-88.
Citation: WANG Rui-jun, CHEN Yu-heng. Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 78-88.
shu

Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment

  • 1. School of Law, Shandong University(Weihai), Weihai 264209, China;

  • 2. School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

  • Received Date: 2020-02-25
    Abstract
  • The judicial application of the lenient system of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment cannot be separated from the cooperation of the procuratorate and the court, and the sentencing suggestions provided by the procuratorate are of great reference value to the judgment results.Through the analysis of the judgment documents on the application of leniency system of admission of guilt and punishment in the public in 2017-2018 in Beijing, after the sentencing suggestions are rejected, and the trial result is lighter, more inclined to adopt correction punishment and the final trial result is more cautious.In the judicial application of sentencing suggestions, it embodies the advantages of distinguishing people, providing reasons and improving the court's discretion, at the same time, it also exposed the disadvantages of the formatting, excessive range and violation of objective laws.For the perfection of sentencing suggestions, we should start from the document style, measurement standard and standard range, supplemented by the entry of the duty lawyer.As for the construction of the relief procedure after the sentencing suggestions are rejected, the court should give an explanation and construct an unobstructed prosecution relief channel.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(0)
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Wen-hua, LV Shuai. Legislative Conception of Conditional Non-Prosecution Applicable to Corporate Compliance Cases[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 335-345. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030089
    [2]HOU Deng-hua, ZHAO Ying-xue. Study on the Discretionary Non-prosecution and the Perfection of Its Supervision and Restriction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 160-166.
    [3]WANG Rui-jun, ZHAI Yu-hang. On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 167-176.
    [4]CHI Da-kui. The Trial Avoidance Effect of Guilty Plea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 84-90,97.
    [5]LIANG Ze-yu. On Protection of Shareholders' Term Interest: Based on Article 6 of the Summary of Civil and Commercial Judicial Work of National Courts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 67-73.
    [6]LIU Jue, YAN Ze-min. Research on the Countermeasures of Procuratorate Reform across Administrative Divisions in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 80-88.
    [7]ZHANG Yan. Remedies for Environmental Nuisance by Neighboring Relationship Institution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 110-115.
    [8]CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
    [9]SONG Lian-bin, DONG Hai-zhou. Research upon Nationality of ICC Awards[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 46-54.
    [10]DONG Ding-yu. A Study on the Women Relief in Beiping(1928-1937)[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 128-134.
    [11]ZHAO Yan-rong. The Reform Pattern of Judicial Mediation System in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 61-64,71.
    [12]WANG Bin-rong, LIU Xiao-hui, ZHANG Ying. The Injunctive Relief of Imminent Infringement of Trade Secret Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 81-84.
    [13]HUO Zheng-xin. Proof of Foreign Law in the U.S.Courts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 78-82,87.
    [14]HAN Yong. Georg·Simmel's Thoughts on Relief to the Poor[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 6-10.
    [15]SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33.
    [16]BI Yu-qian. On Procedure of Saving Evidence from Damage[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 61-67.
    [17]WANG Mei-chun. An Interpretation of Conciliation of Court from a Cultural Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(4): 74-78.
    [18]SUN Jing. A Study on the Legal Remedies of the Bidder's Rights[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2000, 16(3): 58-61.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 李文华，吕帅. 附条件不起诉适用于企业合规案件之立法构想. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2022(03): 335-345 .
    2. 叶海松，曾洵杰，田中琛. 共同犯罪案件中认罪认罚的量刑建议阈值和精准化研究. 法治论坛. 2022(01): 239-248 .
    3. 陈禹衡，尹航. 民刑交叉案件中认罪认罚从宽和民事审判的耦合适用——基于《九民纪要》的视角. 宜宾学院学报. 2021(02): 28-34+45 .
    4. 许译文，池丽娟. 认罪认罚从宽案件量刑问题实证分析——以571份判决书为分析样本. 江西警察学院学报. 2021(01): 118-128 .
    5. 王刚. 认罪认罚案件量刑建议规范化研究. 环球法律评论. 2021(02): 134-149 .
    6. 王瑞君，翟宇航. 量刑建议的文本解读及规范适用研究——基于91份规范性文件的分析. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2021(02): 167-176 .
    7. 孙翔宇，陈禹衡. 从交织到交叉：认罪认罚从宽与自首、坦白关系之解构与重塑. 辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报. 2021(04): 41-46 .
    8. 赵光东. 认罪认罚司法实务中的问题考察和改善路径. 法制博览. 2021(32): 128-129 .
    9. 丁红兵，钱堃. 以“五化”建设为抓手 探析构建认罪认罚量刑阐释制度. 河南检察论坛. 2020(04): 8-11 .

    Other cited types(12)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.1 %FULLTEXT: 9.1 %META: 87.3 %META: 87.3 %PDF: 3.6 %PDF: 3.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.3 %其他: 3.3 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Seattle: 1.0 %Seattle: 1.0 %[]: 1.0 %[]: 1.0 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %北京: 0.3 %北京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %台州: 1.0 %台州: 1.0 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %汕头: 1.0 %汕头: 1.0 %湖州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.7 %珠海: 0.7 %珠海: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 19.9 %芒廷维尤: 19.9 %衢州: 1.0 %衢州: 1.0 %西宁: 65.8 %西宁: 65.8 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贺州: 0.3 %贺州: 0.3 %其他其他ChinaSeattle[]上海北京南京台州哥伦布成都杭州武汉汕头湖州珠海芒廷维尤衢州西宁西安贺州

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (267) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(21)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return