Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality

YIN Jiang-Cheng

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

Volume 38 Issue 6

Dec. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(6): 613-620

YIN Jiang-Cheng. Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 613-620. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

Citation:

YIN Jiang-Cheng. Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 613-620. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

Citation:

PDF( 942 KB)

Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

YIN Jiang-Cheng

School of Marxism, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China

Received Date: 2022-06-23
Available Online: 2022-11-21
Publish Date: 2022-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

The intellectuals, also known as the producers of views and values, are an important academic thesis. The criticism of “Person in Abstract” and the revelation of “Person in Reality” in German Ideology concern the ideology of intellectuals, and are of great significance to contemporary intellectuals. If starting from “Person in Abstract”, the intellectuals might lose their realistic concern, falling to “Intellectual in Abstract”, and be caught in personality illusions, thus seeking personality achievement and human liberation by moral preaching. In addition, intellectuals might stray into the wrong paths from pure speculation detached from reality to double arrogation of theory and reality. It will lead to identity loss, professional conceit and losing class consciousness caused by class origins with unclear labor divisions. Only from the perspective of “Person in Reality” to conduct self-recognition and research can the intellectuals in the new era achieve ideal personalities in practice, speculate and critique based on the reality, and pursue the truth without losing their class property, thus making a big difference in the new journey as well as realizing their own values.
- person in abstract,
- intellectual,
- German Ideology,
- person in reality

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

[1]	左路平. 建党百年意识形态建设的历程、经验与未来趋向[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(4):362-368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.04.003
[2]	爱德华·W·萨义德. 知识分子论[M]. 单德兴, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 2002.
[3]	张建华. 俄罗斯文化中的“知识分子”概念辨析[J]. 北方论丛,2009(1):95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3541.2009.01.024
[4]	陈占彪. 现代知识分子的形成及身份认同[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2007, 28（4）: 112-119.
[5]	章牧. 略论知识分子的独立人格[J]. 南通师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2003, 19（1）: 12-15.
[6]	章牧. 试论知识分子的学术人格[J]. 理论与改革, 2001（5）: 107-110.
[7]	马克思恩格斯全集（第3卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1960.
[8]	托马斯·索维尔. 知识分子与社会[M]. 张亚月, 梁兴国, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2013.
[9]	许纪霖. 世代、阶级和惯习: 知识分子研究的新路径[J]. 江淮文史, 2019（5）: 160-168.
[10]	许纪霖. “少数人的责任”: 近代中国知识分子的士大夫意识[J]. 近代史研究, 2010（3）: 73-90, 3.
[11]	李小宁. 中国知识分子: 一个特殊问题及其消解[J]. 河北省社会主义学院学报, 2001（1）: 27-30.
[12]	黄其洪,袁雄. 21世纪知识分子何为−论萨特和拉吕埃勒对知识分子的反思及其启示[J]. 社会科学研究,2022(1):160-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4769.2022.01.017
[13]	李士芹. 延安时期艾思奇对《改造我们的学习》的阐释与宣传[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(3):314-322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.03.012

Relative Articles

[1]	XING Huachao. Realistic Situation and Countermeasures of Promoting the Leading Force of Mainstream Ideology in Short Video Field in Institutions of Higher Education under the New Media Environment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 31-39. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023070087
[2]	ZUO Lu-ping. The Course, Experience and Future Trend of Ideology Construction of Chinese Communist Party in One Hundred Years[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(4): 362-368.
[3]	LIN Yang-qian. Reflections on the Ideological Issues of Big Data: The Generation and Governance of “Digital Leviathan”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(5): 576-582.
[4]	ZHONG Ming-yang. Analysis of Ideological Security in University Governance from the Perspective of Big Data[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 30-35.
[5]	TAO Xiao, CHEN Shi-dan. “Out of Control” and “No Mind about Control”: Towards a Partnership Relationship between Human and Machine[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 70-77.
[6]	XU Ying. Changes in Intertextuality and Transformation in Ideology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(1): 33-41.
[7]	LU Jun, YIN Yu-jie. On the Ideological Function of University’s Law Education[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 62-66.
[8]	WANG Jiu-gao, ZHANG Shun-yue. The Dissension and Introspection about Intelligentsia Issue in CCP around 1956[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 104-108.
[9]	XU Zhong-ming, YU Ming-zi. Some Thoughts on the Relation between Science-technology and Ideology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 20-24.
[10]	LU Jun. The Consensus Formed in the Process of Communication——On Mainstream Ideology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 124-127.
[11]	PENG Min-quan. Between Ideology and Aesthetic——Zhou Yang's Influence on Three Literature Theory Textbooks[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 84-87.
[12]	GAO Yong-zhou. People Combination in Limited Liability Corporation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 59-64.
[13]	WANG Xiao-ying. Intellectuals' Criticism, Self-confidence and Status——From a Perspective of “Updike in China”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 88-91.
[14]	SHEN Min-rong. Analysis on the Thoughts of Natural Person: Sources and Meaning[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 66-73,84.
[15]	CHENG Mei-dong, HU Shang-yuan. Chinese Intellectuals and the CPC During the Anti-Japanese War: WEN Yi-duo, WEI Jun-yi, ZOU Tao-fen and LI Ding-ming[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 117-123,161.
[16]	GAO Li-peng. A Study on the Mental Support of the Old Intellectuals——A Surrey of the Retired Teachers of a University[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(1): 9-13.
[17]	QIAN Da-yi. The Nonparty Intelligentsia's Cognition and Opinion about College's Reformation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 92-94.