Volume 38 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YIN Jiang-Cheng. Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 613-620. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120
Citation: YIN Jiang-Cheng. Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 613-620. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120
  • Received Date: 2022-06-23
    Available Online: 2022-11-21
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-05
  • The intellectuals, also known as the producers of views and values, are an important academic thesis. The criticism of “Person in Abstract” and the revelation of “Person in Reality” in German Ideology concern the ideology of intellectuals, and are of great significance to contemporary intellectuals. If starting from “Person in Abstract”, the intellectuals might lose their realistic concern, falling to “Intellectual in Abstract”, and be caught in personality illusions, thus seeking personality achievement and human liberation by moral preaching. In addition, intellectuals might stray into the wrong paths from pure speculation detached from reality to double arrogation of theory and reality. It will lead to identity loss, professional conceit and losing class consciousness caused by class origins with unclear labor divisions. Only from the perspective of “Person in Reality” to conduct self-recognition and research can the intellectuals in the new era achieve ideal personalities in practice, speculate and critique based on the reality, and pursue the truth without losing their class property, thus making a big difference in the new journey as well as realizing their own values.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    左路平. 建党百年意识形态建设的历程、经验与未来趋向[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(4):362-368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.04.003
    [2]
    爱德华·W·萨义德. 知识分子论[M]. 单德兴, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 2002.
    [3]
    张建华. 俄罗斯文化中的“知识分子”概念辨析[J]. 北方论丛,2009(1):95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3541.2009.01.024
    [4]
    陈占彪. 现代知识分子的形成及身份认同[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 28(4): 112-119.
    [5]
    章牧. 略论知识分子的独立人格[J]. 南通师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003, 19(1): 12-15.
    [6]
    章牧. 试论知识分子的学术人格[J]. 理论与改革, 2001(5): 107-110.
    [7]
    马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1960.
    [8]
    托马斯·索维尔. 知识分子与社会[M]. 张亚月, 梁兴国, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2013.
    [9]
    许纪霖. 世代、阶级和惯习: 知识分子研究的新路径[J]. 江淮文史, 2019(5): 160-168.
    [10]
    许纪霖. “少数人的责任”: 近代中国知识分子的士大夫意识[J]. 近代史研究, 2010(3): 73-90, 3.
    [11]
    李小宁. 中国知识分子: 一个特殊问题及其消解[J]. 河北省社会主义学院学报, 2001(1): 27-30.
    [12]
    黄其洪,袁雄. 21世纪知识分子何为−论萨特和拉吕埃勒对知识分子的反思及其启示[J]. 社会科学研究,2022(1):160-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4769.2022.01.017
    [13]
    李士芹. 延安时期艾思奇对《改造我们的学习》的阐释与宣传[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(3):314-322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.03.012
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (505) PDF downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return