Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality

YIN Jiang-Cheng

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

Volume 38 Issue 6

Dec. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(6): 613-620

FAN Yang-yang. Skepticism, Subjectivity and Other Themes—Philosophical Perspective in Sun Yu's Research on Lu Xun[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 65-72.

Citation:

YIN Jiang-Cheng. Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 613-620. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

Citation:

PDF( 942 KB)

Personality, Method, Identity: “Person in Abstract” and the Stray of Intellectual Reality

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060120

YIN Jiang-Cheng

School of Marxism, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China

Received Date: 2022-06-23
Available Online: 2022-11-21
Publish Date: 2022-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

The intellectuals, also known as the producers of views and values, are an important academic thesis. The criticism of “Person in Abstract” and the revelation of “Person in Reality” in German Ideology concern the ideology of intellectuals, and are of great significance to contemporary intellectuals. If starting from “Person in Abstract”, the intellectuals might lose their realistic concern, falling to “Intellectual in Abstract”, and be caught in personality illusions, thus seeking personality achievement and human liberation by moral preaching. In addition, intellectuals might stray into the wrong paths from pure speculation detached from reality to double arrogation of theory and reality. It will lead to identity loss, professional conceit and losing class consciousness caused by class origins with unclear labor divisions. Only from the perspective of “Person in Reality” to conduct self-recognition and research can the intellectuals in the new era achieve ideal personalities in practice, speculate and critique based on the reality, and pursue the truth without losing their class property, thus making a big difference in the new journey as well as realizing their own values.
- person in abstract,
- intellectual,
- German Ideology,
- person in reality

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

[1]	左路平. 建党百年意识形态建设的历程、经验与未来趋向[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(4):362-368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.04.003
[2]	爱德华·W·萨义德. 知识分子论[M]. 单德兴, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 2002.
[3]	张建华. 俄罗斯文化中的“知识分子”概念辨析[J]. 北方论丛,2009(1):95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3541.2009.01.024
[4]	陈占彪. 现代知识分子的形成及身份认同[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2007, 28（4）: 112-119.
[5]	章牧. 略论知识分子的独立人格[J]. 南通师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2003, 19（1）: 12-15.
[6]	章牧. 试论知识分子的学术人格[J]. 理论与改革, 2001（5）: 107-110.
[7]	马克思恩格斯全集（第3卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1960.
[8]	托马斯·索维尔. 知识分子与社会[M]. 张亚月, 梁兴国, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2013.
[9]	许纪霖. 世代、阶级和惯习: 知识分子研究的新路径[J]. 江淮文史, 2019（5）: 160-168.
[10]	许纪霖. “少数人的责任”: 近代中国知识分子的士大夫意识[J]. 近代史研究, 2010（3）: 73-90, 3.
[11]	李小宁. 中国知识分子: 一个特殊问题及其消解[J]. 河北省社会主义学院学报, 2001（1）: 27-30.
[12]	黄其洪,袁雄. 21世纪知识分子何为−论萨特和拉吕埃勒对知识分子的反思及其启示[J]. 社会科学研究,2022(1):160-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4769.2022.01.017
[13]	李士芹. 延安时期艾思奇对《改造我们的学习》的阐释与宣传[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(3):314-322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2021.03.012

Relative Articles

[1]	YU Qiang-fu, SHENG Huan-huan. Analysis of C-E Translation of Culture-loaded Words from the Cognitive Metaphorical Perspective — Taking Shanxi Historical Museum Calendar 2021 as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 412-418. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040058
[2]	XIANG Da-jun. A Functional Approach to “Rang” in Modern Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 10-17.
[3]	WANG Fa-zhou. The Reinvestigation to Hu Shi's Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy\|—Several Undiscussed Topics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 87-94.
[4]	WANG Jiu-gao, LI Ya-nan. Analysis on the Cultural Reasons behind the Establishment of the One-partyMilitary Dictatorship by Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Government—From the Perspective of Chiang Kai-shek's Philosophy of Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 86-91.
[5]	GAO Sheng-wen, WANG Min-chen. Comparison of Simple Phase between English and Chinese: A Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(2): 36-45.
[6]	HE Wei, FU Li. Modern Chinese Aspect: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 10-19.
[7]	HE Wei, GAO Jian-hui. Phase in Modern Mandarin Chinese: A Systemic Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 26-36.
[8]	HE Wei, LV Yi. Chinese Tense: A Systemic Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 9-18.
[9]	FENG Zhen-yu, SHEN Ya-xue. On the Omission in Study of China's Technology and Science History——Sun Yuanhua's Contribution to Military Technology in Late Ming Dynasty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(2): 36-43.
[10]	HUANG Guo-wen. “Paraphrase” as a Strategy in Translating Lun Yu(The Analects) into English: A Functional Linguistics Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 16-21.
[11]	HU Li-li. On Lu Xun's Hard Translation from Translation Ethics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 10-15.
[12]	QIAN Zhen-hua. Clique Analysis and Visualization of Co-author Network in the Field of Philosophy of Science and Technology in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 78-85.
[13]	LI Xue-jun. The History Portrait of Soviets Philosophy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 140-144.
[14]	YANG Xiao-yun, WANG Jing-jing, TANG Bo-feng. Research on Industrial Network Based on the Perspective of Complex Network[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 127-131.
[15]	SHE Yi-ning. Philosophical Thought on the Non-linear Design to Pavilions under the Angle of Pan-culture——Taking Expo 2010 Shanghai as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 153-157.
[16]	LIU Chun-yong. A Glance over Lu Xun's Marriage and Love[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 112-116,123.
[17]	WANG Hong-zhe. The Legal Philosophy of Critical Rationalism: Albert's Opinions and Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 74-79.
[18]	HUANG Qiao-sheng. A Review of the Studies on “Lu Xun and Sendai”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 98-103,111.
[19]	YU Hui-yuan. “Nothing”——the Philosophical Dimension of Freedom --on Sartre's Thought of “Nothing”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 52-56.