Citation: | SONG Ping, JIN Zhi-ru. A Contrastive Ecological Discourse Analysis of English Translations of Chinese Public Signs on Environmental Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 599-605. |
[1] |
戴宗发,吕和发. 公示语汉英翻译研究−以2012年奥运会主办城市伦敦为例[J]. 中国翻译,2005(6):38-42.
|
[2] |
周文娟. 汉语环保公示语的生态分析[J]. 外国语言文学,2018,35(5):519-534.
|
[3] |
张群星,顾红,丁晓蔚. 汉语生态环保公示语的文本类型及英译[J]. 大连海事大学学报),2011,10(3):104-107.
|
[4] |
陈丽,胡东平. 目的论指导下的环保类公示语汉英翻译[J]. 乐山师范学院学报,2013,28(8):40-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8666.2013.08.009
|
[5] |
康健. 前瞻式翻译视角下的环保类公示语英译研究[J]. 太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2017,16(1):93-96.
|
[6] |
袁周敏,陈新仁. 环保类告示语的语用研究[J]. 外语学刊,2010(1):76-80.
|
[7] |
吕万英,陈石磊. 公示语汉英翻译中的语用等效分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版),2013,15(4):109-114.
|
[8] |
陈小慰. 公示语翻译的社会价值与译者的修辞意识[J]. 中国翻译,2018,39(1):68-73.
|
[9] |
罗选民,米亚宁. 文化自觉与公示语翻译[J]. 外语电化教学,2019(4):4-11.
|
[10] |
胡晓琼,陈月红. 中国智慧的忠实迻译−以生态公示语“护草篇”为例[J]. 西安外国语大学学报,2020,28(4):92-96.
|
[11] |
何伟,魏榕,STIBBE A. 生态语言学的超学科发展−阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J]. 外语研究,2018,35(2):22-26,112.
|
[12] |
雷蕾,苗兴伟. 生态话语分析中的生态哲学观研究[J]. 外语学刊,2020(3):120-123.
|
[13] |
黄国文,陈旸. 生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J]. 外国语文,2016,32(6):55-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6414.2016.06.010
|
[14] |
何伟,魏榕. 国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J]. 现代外语,2017,40(5):597-607, 729.
|
[15] |
STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by [M]. London: Routledge, 2015.
|
[16] |
黄国文. 论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J]. 外语教学与研究,2017,49(6):880-889, 960.
|
[17] |
何伟,张瑞杰. 生态话语分析模式构建[J]. 中国外语,2017,14(5):56-64.
|
[18] |
何伟,魏榕. 多元和谐, 交互共生−国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构[J]. 外语学刊,2018(6):28-33.
|
[19] |
何伟,刘佳欢. 多元和谐, 交互共生: 生态哲学观的建构与发展[J]. 山东外语教学,2020,41(1):12-24.
|
[20] |
黄国文,陈旸. 生态话语分类的不确定性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报,2018,40(1):3-14.
|
[21] |
STIBBE A. Positive discourse analysis: Rethinking human ecological relationships [C]// Fill A F & PENZ H (eds. ). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. London: Routledge, 2018: 165-178.
|
[22] |
黄国文,赵蕊华. 生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J]. 现代外语,2017,40(5):585-596, 729.
|
[23] |
何伟,魏榕. 话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J]. 当代修辞学,2018(5):63-72.
|
[24] |
HALLIDAY M A K. New ways of meaning: A challenge to applied linguistics[J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1990(6):7-36.
|
[25] |
何伟,耿芳. 英汉环境保护公益广告话语之生态性对比分析[J]. 外语电化教学,2018(4):57-63.
|
[26] |
赵蕊华,黄国文. 和谐话语分析框架及其应用[J]. 外语教学与研究,2021,53(1):42-53, 159-160.
|
[27] |
赵蕊华,黄国文. 汉语生态和谐化构建的系统功能语言学分析[J]. 外语研究,2019,36(4):44-49, 108.
|
[28] |
苗兴伟,雷蕾. 基于系统功能语言学的生态话语分析[J]. 山东外语教学,2019,40(1):13-22.
|
[29] |
袁颖. 媒体报道的生态取向: BBC中国雾霾新闻标题的生态话语分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(4):33-41.
|
[30] |
何伟, 张瑞杰, 淡晓红, 等. 英语功能语义分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017.
|
[31] |
HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold, 1985.
|
[32] |
MARTIN J R, MATTGUESSEB C M I M & PAINTER C. Developing Functional Grammar [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2010.
|
[1] | HE Wei, TIAN Yi. A Contrastive Study of Chinese and French International Chinese Language Textbooks from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 65-73. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024040123 |
[2] | REN Ran, GAO Ge. Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 94-103. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030 |
[3] | LI Bingnan, SUN Yi. Multimodal Ecological Concept Construction of Only One World[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 563-573. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030033 |
[4] | YU Hui, SONG Jin-ge. A Multimodal Approach to the Social Semiotic Construction of Ecological Meanings in Children’s Picture Book[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 667-676. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100067 |
[5] | PAN Jie, YUAN Su-rong. An Eco-discourse Analysis of Return to Nature from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 185-192. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090018 |
[6] | CHEN Ming-fang, CAO Jun-feng. Lexico-grammatical Realization of Ecosophy in the Nature Poem of What Mystery Pervades a Well[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 239-246. |
[7] | CHANG Yuan. An Analysis of the State of the Art of Ecolinguistics at Home and Abroad[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 583-591. |
[8] | LIU Yan. The Construction of Ecological Features of Environmental Discourse: As Exemplified in the “China Daily News Corpus of Climate Change”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 254-263. |
[9] | ZHAO Xiu-feng, LIU Chang. A Comparative Study of Energy White Papers between China and Britain from the Perspective of International Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 17-25. |
[10] | YANG Cai-ying, ZHONG Ting. The Transitivity Approach to the Ecological Care in The Call of The Wild[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 28-32,40. |
[11] | LIU Shu-xin. Construction of China Image: Harmonious Discourse Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 38-45. |
[12] | YUAN Ying. The Ecological Approach of Media Reports: An Ecological Discourse Analysis of the BBC News Headlines about China Haze[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 33-41. |
[13] | CHANG Jun-fang, CONG Ying-xu. A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 27-32. |
[14] | CHEN Rong. A Study of Non-impersonal Features in the Introductions of Ecology Papers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 42-48. |
[15] | YI Xiu-qing. Transitivity and the Theme of Pursuit: Morrison's Song of Solomon[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 50-55. |
[16] | CHEN Hai-ye, ZHI Hong. Interpretation of Hemingway’s “Iceberg” Theory from Perspective of Systemic Functional Appliable Linguistics: Exemplified with Killers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(5): 41-47. |
[17] | SU Hang, LIU Cheng-yu. A Comparative Study of Transitivity between Sydney Grammar and Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 41-47. |
[18] | CHEN Ying. The Function of Functional Discourse Analysis to the Ability of English Reading——Analyzing One News Discourse from the Perspective of Transitivity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 31-36. |
[19] | SU Hang, LIU Cheng-yu. Analyzing English Verbally Expressed Jokes in the Framework of Transitivity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 28-32. |
[20] | HE Wei, MA Rui-zhi. Overview of the Transitivity System within the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 98-105,119. |