CHANG Jun-fang, CONG Ying-xu. A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 27-32.
Citation: CHANG Jun-fang, CONG Ying-xu. A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 27-32.

A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection

  • Received Date: 2017-06-20
    Available Online: 2021-06-01
  • The study tries to construct the multi-stratal analysis pattern of ecological discourse by analyzing the ideology,context and discourse levels from the discourse delivered by China’s minister of environment protection from the systemic functional perspective.The research finds that the ideology in the speech accords with Marxism’s conception of ecological development and that the benefits of growth are broadly shared.The language bears typical political features in which grammatical metaphors, declarative sentences, especially imperative sentences are widely used.Thematic progression, reference, lexical cohesion and conjunction together promote cohesion.The multi-stratal analysis pattern helps to analyze the cognitive and functional generation mechanism of ecological discourse and enrich the ecological linguistics theory.

     

  • [1]
    Fill, A.Ecolinguistics:state of the art 1998[A].In Fill,A.and Mühlhäusler, P.(eds.).The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London and New York:Continuum,2001:43-53.
    [2]
    Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990,(6):7-36.
    [3]
    Jung, M.Ecological criticism of language[A].In Fill,A.and Mühlhäusler P.(eds.).The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London and New York:Continuum,2001:270-285.
    [4]
    Mühlhäusler, P.Language of Environment:Environment of Language:A Course in Ecolinguistics[M].London:Battlebridge,2003.
    [5]
    王晋军.生态语言学:语言学研究的新视域[J].天津外国语学院学报,2007,(1):53-57.
    [6]
    陈吉宁.以改善环境质量为核心全力打好补齐环保短板攻坚战[EB/OL].(2016-01-11)[2017-05-06].http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/vom/2016-01/15/content_5033089.htm.
    [7]
    Haugen,E.On the ecology of languages[Z].Talk delivered at a conference at Burg Wartenstein, Austria, 1970.
    [8]
    辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析 [J].外语教学,2013,(3):7-10.
    [9]
    黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,(1):1-5.
    [10]
    Couto,H.H.Ecological approaches in linguistics:a historical overview [J]. Language Sciences, 2014,(41):125.
    [11]
    黄国文.从系统功能语言学到生态语言学[J].外语教学,2017, (5):1-7.
    [12]
    黄国文,赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法 [J].现代外语,2017,(5):585-596.
    [13]
    何伟,魏榕.国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J].现代外语, 2017, (5):597-607.
    [14]
    赵蕊华.系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式——以生态报告中银无须鳕鱼身份构建为例 [J].中国外语,2016,(5):84-91.
    [15]
    Stibbe, A.Ecolinguistics:Language, Ecology and the Sto-ries We Live by[M].London and New York:Taylor & Francis Group,2015.
    [16]
    Halliday,M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation ofLanguageand Meaning [M].London:Arnold,1976.Beijing:Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.
    [17]
    李忠华.韩礼德的马克思主义语言观[J].山东外语教学,2013,(60):39-48.
    [18]
    刘晓宇.基于环保视域下的马克思主义自然观解读[J].兰州学刊,2012,(10):206-207.
    [19]
    Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar(2nd edition)[M].London:Arnold/Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,1994/2000.
    [20]
    丛迎旭,王红阳.基于语义变化的概念语法隐喻模式与类型 [J].现代外语,2013,(1):33-39.
    [21]
    丛迎旭.名物化的纯理功能与文体特征[J].北京第二外国语学院学报(外语版),2007,(8):46-50.
    [22]
    吕叔湘.现代汉语八百词 [M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
    [23]
    Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R.Cohesion in English[M].London:Longman,1976.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GAO Shengwen. On the Ideological Construction of University Journal from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 112-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090061
    [2]HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
    [3]CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
    [4]LI Bingnan, SUN Yi. Multimodal Ecological Concept Construction of Only One World[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 563-573. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030033
    [5]HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
    [6]YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
    [7]BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
    [8]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [9]WU Yuan-zheng, FENG De-zheng. The Attitudinal Meaning and Value Construction in Multimodal Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 677-684. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100139
    [10]LIU Yan. Readability Studies from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 11-18,27.
    [11]ZHAO Xiu-feng, LIU Chang. A Comparative Study of Energy White Papers between China and Britain from the Perspective of International Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 17-25.
    [12]CHEN Rong. A Study of Non-impersonal Features in the Introductions of Ecology Papers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 42-48.
    [13]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Review of Transitivity Studies within Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 1-20.
    [14]HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
    [15]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [16]LI Zhong-hua. Research on Probability from a Systemic Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 13-16.
    [17]CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
    [18]GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
    [19]HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
    [20]HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 荆琳. 基于及物性系统的《生物多样性行动指南》生态话语分析. 黑河学院学报. 2023(05): 116-119+122 .
    2. 陈京明. 系统功能语法视角下教育语篇生态话语分析——以《新视野大学英语读写教程》为例. 萍乡学院学报. 2023(02): 93-97 .
    3. 陈京明. 试论系统功能语法视角下生态话语分析模式构建——以《新视野大学英语读写教程》为例. 文化创新比较研究. 2023(27): 51-56 .
    4. 时常珺. 生态视角下慕课教学中教师话语的及物性分析. 常州工学院学报(社科版). 2022(03): 93-97 .
    5. 时常珺. 慕课教学中教师话语人际功能的生态化研究. 海外英语. 2022(23): 63-65 .
    6. 田保民. 元功能视角下的生态话语分析——以《习近平谈治国理政》(第3卷)为例. 汉字文化. 2022(S1): 59-61 .
    7. 曾蕾,洪丹. 德育教材生态话语之图文态度评价模式探讨. 中国外语. 2021(01): 53-62 .
    8. 阚梦. 散文语篇生态话语分析——以《春》为例. 汉字文化. 2021(23): 11-14 .
    9. 常远. 基于ROST内容挖掘的国内外生态语言学研究动态及热点分析. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2021(06): 583-591 .
    10. 马敬想,梁美霞. 华兹华斯自然诗歌的生态话语分析——以《致杜鹃》为例. 许昌学院学报. 2021(06): 69-73 .
    11. 陈令君,王钰杰. 评价理论态度视域下《春望》及其英译本的生态话语分析. 惠州学院学报. 2020(04): 87-92 .
    12. 陈令君,王钰杰. 及物性视角下《观沧海》及其英译本的生态话语分析. 惠州学院学报. 2019(01): 95-100+128 .
    13. 陈雨涵. 功能语言学视角下的生态话语分析. 文学教育(下). 2019(03): 36-37 .
    14. 何伟,高然. 生态语言学研究综观. 浙江外国语学院学报. 2019(01): 1-12 .
    15. 吴林,张雪蓝. 基于CiteSpace的国内生态话语分析研究. 现代语文. 2019(06): 185-191 .
    16. 刘玉梅,王术芬. 自然诗歌的生态话语分析——以Thomas Nashe的《春》为例. 外国语文. 2019(05): 91-97 .
    17. 蒋婷,杨银花. 对人工智能科普话语的生态性探究. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2019(06): 1-9 .
    18. 王钰杰,陈令君. 评价理论视角下《归园田居·其一》及其英译本的生态话语分析. 湖北科技学院学报. 2019(06): 67-72 .
    19. 刘洋. 中国生态语言学研究综述. 教育界. 2018(12): 51-54 .

    Other cited types(76)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0301020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.8 %FULLTEXT: 18.8 %META: 76.7 %META: 76.7 %PDF: 4.4 %PDF: 4.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.4 %其他: 9.4 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %Canyon Country: 0.2 %Canyon Country: 0.2 %China: 0.7 %China: 0.7 %Clarks Summit: 0.1 %Clarks Summit: 0.1 %San Lorenzo: 0.3 %San Lorenzo: 0.3 %Seattle: 1.4 %Seattle: 1.4 %Taichung: 0.2 %Taichung: 0.2 %[]: 0.8 %[]: 0.8 %上海: 3.7 %上海: 3.7 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %兰州: 0.7 %兰州: 0.7 %北京: 2.2 %北京: 2.2 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %吉隆坡: 0.8 %吉隆坡: 0.8 %呼和浩特: 0.7 %呼和浩特: 0.7 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %廊坊: 0.7 %廊坊: 0.7 %开封: 0.3 %开封: 0.3 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %成都: 2.1 %成都: 2.1 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 0.7 %新奥尔良: 0.7 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %桂林: 0.6 %桂林: 0.6 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %珠海: 1.7 %珠海: 1.7 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %肇庆: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 18.5 %芒廷维尤: 18.5 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %西宁: 35.5 %西宁: 35.5 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %鄂州: 0.2 %鄂州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他Canyon CountryChinaClarks SummitSan LorenzoSeattleTaichung[]上海东莞丽水兰州北京南京南昌吉隆坡呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴大庆天津宣城常州广州廊坊开封张家口徐州成都扬州拉斯维加斯新奥尔良无锡昆明杭州桂林武汉沧州洛阳济南渭南湖州湛江漯河珠海石家庄福州秦皇岛肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水西宁西安西雅图诺沃克邯郸郑州鄂州重庆锦州镇江长沙阜新阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (659) PDF downloads(44) Cited by(95)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return