SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
Citation: SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018

The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
  • Received Date: 2023-12-04
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-01
  • How to identify the facts and apply the laws is a common problem in litigation. From the aspects of strengthening the judge’s mental impression, easing the burden of proof of the parties, and ensuring the equality of arms between the parties, as a special way of fact finding, primary-face proof plays an irreplaceable role in trial practice. However, after a long period of debate, theoretical research and prejudication remain controversial on how to define thr primary-face proof, so when considering whether to introduce the system into the Civil Procedure Law of our country, there are many concerns. In order to make primary-face proof play its due function value, it should be clear on the basis of its nature, learning from foreign related theories, analyzing and combing its basic structure, so as to provide effective experience for China’s civil legislation.

     

  • [1]
    王亚新. 对抗与判定——日本民事诉讼的基本结构[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2010.
    [2]
    胡学军. 表见证明理论批判[J]. 法律科学,2014,32(4):90-101.
    [3]
    毕玉谦. 试论表见证明的基本属性与应用功能之界定[J]. 证据科学,2007(1):97-112.
    [4]
    龙宗智. 推定的界限及适用[J]. 法学研究,2008(1):106-125.
    [5]
    周翠. 从事实推定走向表见证明[J]. 现代法学,2014,36(6):108-126.
    [6]
    张卫平. 自由心证原则的再认识:制约与保障——以民事诉讼的事实认定为中心[J]. 政法论丛,2017(4):14-21.
    [7]
    最高人民法院民事审判第一庭,编著. 民事诉讼证据司法解释的理解与适用[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2002.
    [8]
    普维庭. 现代证明责任问题[M]. 吴越,译. 北京:法律出版社,2006.
    [9]
    曾培芳,段文波. 德国表见证明理论在医疗诉讼证明责任分配中的运用[J]. 政治与法律,2007(4):170-175.
    [10]
    姜世明. 举证责任与证明度[M]. 厦门:厦门大学出版社,2017.
    [11]
    吴杰. 民事诉讼法证明标准理论研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2007.
    [12]
    陈界融. 证据法:证明负担原理与法则研究[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [13]
    高桥宏志. 民事诉讼法:制度与理论的深层分析[M]. 林剑锋,译. 北京:法律出版社,2003.
    [14]
    邱聪智. 从侵权行为归责原理之变动论危险责任之构成[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
    [15]
    姜世明. 证据评价论[M]. 厦门:厦门大学出版社,2017.
    [16]
    新堂幸司. 新民事诉讼法[M]. 林剑锋,译. 北京:法律出版社,2008.
    [17]
    胡学军. 具体举证责任论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2014.
    [18]
    江伟,主编. 中国证据法草案(建议稿)及立法理由书[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [19]
    中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定[N]. 人民日报,2014-10-29(01).
    [20]
    周强. 推进严格司法[N]. 人民日报,2014-11-14(06).
    [21]
    张卫平. 民事证据法[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2017.
    [22]
    乔芳娥,王发财. 辩论主义视角下民事自认的“审判拘束效”[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(6):789-797.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]SUN Shan. Judicial Application and Theoretical Review of Big Data Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 69-78. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010112
    [2]LEI Da, ZHENG Xujiang. Identification of “Personal Information” from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 310-319. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080012
    [3]LIN Jing, CHEN Lin. Improvement of the Interest Balancing Method in the Identification of the Nature of the Internet Advertising Blocking Behavior[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 79-87.
    [4]HE Su-ping. The Rule of Secular Myth beyond the Normality—The Connotations of Buzzati’s Travels in Modern Hell[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 54-60,97.
    [5]XIANG Da-jun. Towards the Experiential Grammar of “chi” in Modern Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 23-29,58.
    [6]WANG Lei. Aristotle's Equality Ideas and Their Legal Sense[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 76-80.
    [7]WANG Gen-lian. An Interpretation of the Syntactics and Semantics of “Fact” Projection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 10-16.
    [8]WANG Li-min, LIU Jing. Empirical Analysis and the Countermeasure on the Determination of Needy Students in Colleges and Universities with Non-income Indicators[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 89-93.
    [9]XIAO Jian-hua, ZHOU Wei. On Theoretical System of Distribution of Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 46-51.
    [10]LIN Jian. The Function Mechanism of Social Networks in Venture Financing[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 33-40.
    [11]XIAO Jian-guo, XIE Jun. Research on the Distribution of Burden of Proof to Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 55-61.
    [12]HAN Yin-lan, DU Xiao-zhi. Redefinition of the Equality of Creditor's Rights in the Subrogation Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 33-36.
    [13]XIAO Jian-hua, WANG De-xin. The Methodological of Meaning of Burden of Proof Judgement in Civil Law System: A Concurrent Analysis of Its Misuse by Chinese Scholars[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 44-51.
    [14]TAO Yong. Reconstructing the System of Rural Public Goods and Lightening Farmer's Burden[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 62-66.
    [15]ZHANG Ji-cheng. Logic Foundation of Matter-of-Fact Inference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(2): 74-78.
    [16]TIAN Xue-mei. Can the Market Economy Rule Replace the Moral Rule[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 5-7.
    [17]XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.
    [18]YANG Du. Deepening Purchase Management of SOE: A Perspective in Yaxing's Experence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2000, 16(4): 27-30.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 24.4 %FULLTEXT: 24.4 %META: 66.5 %META: 66.5 %PDF: 9.0 %PDF: 9.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.3 %其他: 21.3 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %十堰: 1.4 %十堰: 1.4 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %天津: 3.2 %天津: 3.2 %太原: 0.9 %太原: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.5 %广安: 0.5 %广安: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %温州: 2.3 %温州: 2.3 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %漯河: 4.1 %漯河: 4.1 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 14.9 %芒廷维尤: 14.9 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衡水: 2.3 %衡水: 2.3 %衡阳: 1.8 %衡阳: 1.8 %西宁: 2.3 %西宁: 2.3 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 29.0 %郑州: 29.0 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阳泉: 3.6 %阳泉: 3.6 %其他上海临汾十堰南京哥伦布嘉兴天津太原常州平顶山广安广州张家口扬州杭州温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤苏州衡水衡阳西宁邯郸郑州重庆长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (145) PDF downloads(20) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return