LEI Da, ZHENG Xujiang. Identification of “Personal Information” from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 310-319. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080012
Citation: LEI Da, ZHENG Xujiang. Identification of “Personal Information” from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 310-319. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080012

Identification of “Personal Information” from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order-From the Perspective of the Crime of Violating Citizens’ Personal Information

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080012
  • Received Date: 2022-08-03
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-25
  • Personal information has become one of the most valuable resources in the 21st century. The illegal use of citizens’ personal information has become the focus of the current criminal law governance. In judicial practice, the phenomenon of mixing personal information and related concepts has become the norm, which affects the understanding of the constitutive requirements of the crime of infringing citizens’ personal information and the scope of punishment. As the object of the crime of infringing citizens’ personal information, “personal information” is an inevitable product of the convergence of criminal and civil norms. Therefore, we should try to interpret the concept of “personal information” under the guidance of the principle of unity of legal order: in the form, based on the provisions of the Civil Code, we should adopt the concept of personal information in a narrow sense, and strictly distinguish the relationship between personal information, personal data and privacy; in essence, we should deeply grasp the legal core of the crime of infringing citizens’ personal information. As the object of this crime, personal information should fully reflect the legal nature of the right to self-determination of personal information, and provide a solid foundation for the realization of the right to choose and decide.

     

  • [1]
    刘仁文, 等. 立体刑法学[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2018.
    [2]
    高铭暄, 马克昌. 刑法学(第十版)[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2022.
    [3]
    申卫星. 数字权利体系再造:迈向隐私、信息与数据的差序格局[J]. 政法论坛,2022,40(3):89-102.
    [4]
    房绍坤,曹相见. 论个人信息人格利益的隐私本质[J]. 法制与社会发展,2019,25(4):99-120.
    [5]
    齐爱民. 私法视野下的信息[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2012.
    [6]
    杨立新. 个人信息:法益抑或民事权利−对《民法总则》第111条规定的“个人信息”之解读[J]. 法学论坛,2018,33(1):34-45.
    [7]
    李旭. 个人数据法律保护的规范对象:权益基础、行为风险与权力失衡[J]. 人权研究(辑刊),2021,25(2):382-404,530-531.
    [8]
    劳东燕. 个人数据的刑法保护模式[J]. 比较法研究,2020(5):35-50.
    [9]
    程啸. 论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J]. 中国社会科学,2018(3):102-122,207-208.
    [10]
    梅夏英. 数据的法律属性及其民法定位[J]. 中国社会科学,2016(9):164-183,209.
    [11]
    张明楷. 刑法学(上)(第六版)[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021.
    [12]
    周汉华. 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法及立法研究报告[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006.
    [13]
    高志宏. 隐私、个人信息、数据三元分治的法理逻辑与优化路径[J]. 法制与社会发展,2022,28(2):207-224.
    [14]
    张楚. 集体法益视野下获取公民个人信息行为的入罪限度研究[J]. 刑法论丛,2021,65(1):250-274.
    [15]
    王肃之. 被害人教义学核心原则的发展−基于侵犯公民个人信息罪法益的反思[J]. 政治与法律,2017(10):27-38.
    [16]
    陈伟,宋坤鹏. 数据化时代“公民个人信息”的范围再界定[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(2):88-96.
    [17]
    高富平,王文祥. 出售或提供公民个人信息入罪的边界−以侵犯公民个人信息罪所保护的法益为视角[J]. 政治与法律,2017(2):46-55.
    [18]
    王昭武,肖凯. 侵犯公民个人信息犯罪认定中的若干问题[J]. 法学,2009(12):146-155.
    [19]
    刘宪权,王哲. 侵犯公民个人信息罪刑法适用的调整和重构[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,46(1):87-95.
    [20]
    曲新久. 论侵犯公民个人信息犯罪的超个人法益属性[J]. 人民检察,2015(11):5-9.
    [21]
    姚岳绒. 宪法视野中的个人信息保护[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2012.
    [22]
    余文清. 民法典中居住权规范的宪法意涵[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(1):103-110.
    [23]
    田宏杰. 刑法法益:现代刑法的正当根基和规制边界[J]. 法商研究,2020,37(6):75-88.
    [24]
    张明楷. 法益初论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000.
    [25]
    刘志刚. 人格尊严的宪法意义[J]. 中国法学,2007(1):37-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1707.2007.01.005
    [26]
    臧铁伟, 李寿伟. 中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)条文说明、立法理由及相关规定[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
    [27]
    刘艳红. 民法编纂背景下侵犯公民个人信息罪的保护法益:信息自决权−以刑民一体化及《民法总则》第111条为视角[J]. 浙江工商大学学报,2019(6):20-32.
    [28]
    杨芳. 个人信息自决权理论及其检讨−兼论个人信息保护法之保护客体[J]. 比较法研究,2015(6):22-33.
    [29]
    孙国祥. 集体法益的刑法保护及其边界[J]. 法学研究,2018,40(6):37-52.
    [30]
    马永强. 侵犯公民个人信息罪的法益属性确证[J]. 环球法律评论,2021,43(2):102-118.
    [31]
    周光权. 法秩序统一性的含义与刑法体系解释−以侵害英雄烈士名誉、荣誉罪为例[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2022,25(2):6-19.
    [32]
    卡尔·恩吉施. 法律思维导论(修订版)[M]. 郑永流, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
    [33]
    王昭武. 法秩序统一性视野下违法判断的相对性[J]. 中外法学,2015,27(1):170-197.
    [34]
    亨利·莱维·布律尔. 法律社会学[M]. 许钧, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1987.
    [35]
    恩斯特·A. 克莱默. 法律方法论[M]. 周万里, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019.
    [36]
    潘运华. 习近平法治思想中的“国家治理现代化”法治理念与民法典规范[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(2):208-214.
    [37]
    田宏杰. 刑民交叉问题的实体法立场与分析方法[J]. 政治与法律,2021(12):39-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9512.2021.12.zzyfl202112004
    [38]
    张新宝. 《民法总则》个人信息保护条文研究[J]. 中外法学,2019,31(1):54-75.
    [39]
    陈文涛. 犯罪认定中的法秩序统一性原理:内涵澄清与规则构建[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2022,25(2):46-58.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JU Zhiqin, GAO Xiuxue. The Information Prominence of Chinese Experiential Aspect Marker guo and Its Explanatory Power to the Grammatical Meaning of guo[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 71-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100032
    [2]LIAO Jianqiu, TIAN Bin. Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 94-105. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113
    [3]ZOU Kailiang, WANG Xindi. Compliance and Construction of Platform Enterprise Data from the Perspective of Sensitive Personal Information Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 87-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023040070
    [4]LIU Jinlin. Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 99-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022
    [5]LIN Jing, LIAN Yuting. Localization of the Portability Right of Personal Health Data[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 466-474. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100087
    [6]GONG Lin, FU Cui-ying. Research on the Protection of Personal Information by Privacy Policy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 111-119. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060035
    [7]TANG Lei. The Application of a Spoken Language Corpus Based on Information Embodied in Conversations: Practical Use and Evaluation of Attributes and Multimodal Information[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 64-71.
    [8]CHEN Hai. The Aesthetic Meaning of “the Medium is the Message”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(3): 50-54.
    [9]LIU Xin-hua, LI Chun-hao. Study on the Information Disclosure of Internal Control of the Listed Banks in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 163-167,178.
    [10]WANG Wei-dong. From “Self” to “Individual”: Lu Xun's Traditional Model of Thinking in the Acceptance of German Individualism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 1-9.
    [11]LUO Ke-quan. The Individuals Communities of Negative Freedom: on Noziek's Heterogeneity Utopia[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 51-54.
    [12]LIU Ya-li, HU Zhi-ying. On the Information and Incentives Regulation for Natural Monopoly Industry[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 21-25,35.
    [13]WANG Shu-zhen. On the Necessity and Possibility of Government Supplying Public Information in Crisis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(1): 24-26.
    [14]LU Jun, YAN Geng. An Analysis on Main Factors which Obstruct the Openness of Electronic Government Administratian Information[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 36-41.
    [15]WANG Zhen-qin, WANG Wei-cai, LI Qiu-yan. The Analysis of Preventing Risk in Residential Mortgage in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 56-59.
    [16]LIU Wen-xia. On Einstein's Idea of Unity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 81-83.
    [17]LIU Dong, REN Chang-rui. The Exposition of Chinese Enterprise Information Innovation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(2): 99-103.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.0 %FULLTEXT: 28.0 %META: 67.1 %META: 67.1 %PDF: 4.9 %PDF: 4.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.3 %其他: 8.3 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Rochester: 1.6 %Rochester: 1.6 %Seattle: 0.7 %Seattle: 0.7 %上海: 3.1 %上海: 3.1 %东莞: 0.7 %东莞: 0.7 %中卫: 0.1 %中卫: 0.1 %佛山: 0.5 %佛山: 0.5 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 3.7 %北京: 3.7 %北海: 0.1 %北海: 0.1 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %华盛顿州: 0.4 %华盛顿州: 0.4 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %宜宾: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.7 %平顶山: 0.7 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 4.2 %张家口: 4.2 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %淄博: 0.7 %淄博: 0.7 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %百色: 0.2 %百色: 0.2 %石家庄: 4.3 %石家庄: 4.3 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 26.5 %芒廷维尤: 26.5 %芝加哥: 1.9 %芝加哥: 1.9 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %西宁: 24.6 %西宁: 24.6 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.4 %诺沃克: 0.4 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 2.0 %郑州: 2.0 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %其他其他Canyon CountryChinaRochesterSeattle上海东莞中卫佛山兰州北京北海十堰华盛顿州南京哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴天津太原宜宾宣城常州平顶山广州张家口成都扬州日照昆明朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉淄博深圳温州湖州漯河珠海百色石家庄秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田衡水西宁西安许昌诺沃克遵义邯郸郑州金华银川长沙阳泉鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (556) PDF downloads(41) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return