Redefinition of the Equality of Creditor's Rights in the Subrogation Theory

HAN Yin-lan; DU Xiao-zhi

Volume 21 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2005 > 21(3): 33-36

HAN Yin-lan, DU Xiao-zhi. Redefinition of the Equality of Creditor's Rights in the Subrogation Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 33-36.

Citation:

HAN Yin-lan, DU Xiao-zhi. Redefinition of the Equality of Creditor's Rights in the Subrogation Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 33-36.

Citation:

PDF( 407 KB)

Redefinition of the Equality of Creditor's Rights in the Subrogation Theory

School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2005-04-30
Available Online: 2021-06-30

Abstract

Abstract

Becaused of the real need of economic development subrogation betrays the “rule of warehousing” in its exercising effect. Its function has developed from “to assure the safety of creditor's rights” to “a way of exercising creditor's rights”. Thus the principle of equality of creditor's rights regulated by the tradition contract law has made a great change, which has been arousing questions in the civil law field. In terms of the laws in effect and the related theories in law philosophy, the article explores the real pursuit of equality of creditor's rights, which is a kind of opportunity equality, rather than an absolute result equality.
- equality of creditor's rights,
- subrogation,
- rules of warehousing,
- opportunity equality

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	LIAO Jianqiu, TIAN Bin. Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 94-105. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113
[2]	ZHU Zufei, KANG Ming. Interpreting the Independence of Real Right Act in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 486-500. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100050
[3]	LI Xiao-qiu, LI Xue-qian. On the Coordination and Application of Notification Removal Rule and Pre-lawsuit Behavior Preservation—From the Perspective ofPatent Infringement Involving E-commerce Platform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 81-88.
[4]	ZHAO Liang. Comparison of Rules and Competition Model and Words and Rules Model[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 32-37.
[5]	WANG Lei. Aristotle's Equality Ideas and Their Legal Sense[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 76-80.
[6]	JIE Fang. On the Equality in Aristotle's Friendship[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 93-96.
[7]	WU Ka. How Treaty Rules Become Customary International Law: UNCLOS 1982 as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 71-75,85.
[8]	ZHANG Ceng-lian. The Improvement of Teaching Evaluation Methods Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Association Rules[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 165-169.
[9]	AI Wei-li. Study on the Legeal Principle of Real Estate Registration System in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 91-96.
[10]	QIAN Zhen-hua, ZHANG Hui-lan. The Priority Issue Between Polanyi and Kuhn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 158-163.
[11]	TIAN Mei-yan, DONG Kun. Constructing Illegal Evidence Exclusim Rules under Investigation Mode[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 60-65.
[12]	ZHANG Lu-li. On the Immunity Right of the State Head[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 62-69,100.
[13]	ZHANG Xiao-xi. Freedom and Equality Deduced in Logic——A Comparison between Rousseau's Thoughts and Ma Junwu's Perception[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 46-50.
[15]	LIU Yong-xin. A Study of the Validity of the Concurrence of Secunriy Interest[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 54-57.
[16]	HENG Lin. Social Communication Based on Rules:Rule of Law and Rule of Moral——Tradition, Rule and Modernization[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 8-14.
[17]	WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Fuzziness of the WTO Rules[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 21-25.
[18]	LI Wan-ping. Value and Fulfillment of the Right to Silence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 76-79.
[19]	WU Feng, DU Xiao-zhi. Research on The Right of Corporation's Personalty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(3): 78-83.