Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement

XIAO Jian-hua

Volume 17 Issue 2

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2001 > 17(2): 53-60

XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.

Citation:

XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.

XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.

Citation:

XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.

PDF( 660 KB)

Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement

XIAO Jian-hua

Research Center of Procedure Law, University of Politics and Law Science of China, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2001-02-10
Available Online: 2021-07-14

Abstract

Abstract

Judicial Provement is a Subjective Process of Judgement. Judges cognize facts of suit fairly subjectively. Court's Judgements only reach law reality, not objective truth. To insure the impersonality of judgement, we should advance judge's qualification and admit that judges have the right to verdict evidence freely.
- Judical Provement,
- impersonality,
- subjectivity,
- verdict evidence freely

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Shan. Judicial Application and Theoretical Review of Big Data Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 69-78. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010112
[2]	SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
[3]	LIU Jinlin. Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 99-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022
[4]	LU Ying. On the Essence,the Feature and the Relationship of the Subjectivity and the Emphasis in the Utterance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 26-37.
[5]	YANG Qiu-hong. On the Drama of “Robe and Wat”—With the Evolution of the Army Color and Solitary Color Clothes in Dramas of Yuan and Ming Dynasties[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(2): 100-108.
[6]	LIU Cheng-yu, WU Xiao-qin. Individual Differences in Semantic Subjectivity of Modern Chinese Modal Particles: A Case Study of Thunderstorm[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 5-11.
[7]	WANG Xiao. On “Subjectivity” of Sun Yat-sen's Socialist Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 172-177.
[8]	KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
[9]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
[10]	XIAO Jian-hua, ZHOU Wei. On Theoretical System of Distribution of Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 46-51.
[11]	SI Hua-qiang. The Foundation and the Enforcement Path of Fairness and Justice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 68-75.
[12]	KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64.
[13]	XIAO Jian-guo, XIE Jun. Research on the Distribution of Burden of Proof to Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 55-61.
[14]	KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.
[15]	XIAO Jian-hua, WANG De-xin. The Methodological of Meaning of Burden of Proof Judgement in Civil Law System: A Concurrent Analysis of Its Misuse by Chinese Scholars[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 44-51.
[16]	XIAO Jian-guo. On the Nature and the Effect of Civil Enforcement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 11-18.
[17]	WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
[18]	DAI Shu-fen, CHEN Xiang. Thought of Making Proper Use of Personnel Reflected in Xin Shu——Zhu Geliang's Way of Choosing the Right Person[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 93-96.
[19]	XU Xiao-cun. The Rationally Objective Attitude in Acdenic Research——a flank of Wang Yao's research characteristics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 58-61.
[20]	CHEN Xiong-fei. Research on the Mens Rea and Actus Reus of solicitation in the Common Law System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 43-47.