Review and Critique of the Human Nature Foundation of Private Law System——On <i>Historical Evolution and Contemporary Construction of Civil Subject</i>

CHEN Fu-sheng

Volume 30 Issue 6

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2014 > 30(6): 74-77,84

CHEN Fu-sheng. Review and Critique of the Human Nature Foundation of Private Law System——On Historical Evolution and Contemporary Construction of Civil Subject[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(6): 74-77,84.

Citation:

CHEN Fu-sheng. Review and Critique of the Human Nature Foundation of Private Law System——On Historical Evolution and Contemporary Construction of Civil Subject[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(6): 74-77,84.

Citation:

PDF( 719 KB)

Review and Critique of the Human Nature Foundation of Private Law System——On Historical Evolution and Contemporary Construction of Civil Subject

CHEN Fu-sheng

College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Received Date: 2014-08-15
Available Online: 2021-06-21

Abstract

Abstract

Civil subject is the foundation of people's status and judicial system in the private law. The analysis of the value of civil subject in history not only reveals the specific value of civil subject, but also experienced a refinement and update in the system and reality. Therefore the reflection of the human nature foundation in the private law needs to adhere to the requirements of the civil subject on the one hand, and to face and settle the tension between the freedom and equality on the other hand. Of course, the tension between the value rationality and instrumental rationality is not only the millennium problem plaguing Chinese and foreign legists, but also the problem in the study of contemporary construction of civil subject in China.
- civil subject,
- the system in private law,
- value appeal,
- the human nature foundation

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	YANG Binbin. The Subject Expression, Logical Relation and Construction Requirement of Institutional Superiority Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 11-18. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010013
[2]	SONG Ziling, WANG Guiyan. The Foundation, Core Meaning and Practical Value of Marx’s Ecological Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 19-25. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030104
[3]	SHEN Wei, LIU Lei. The Constitutional Basis of the Legal Interest: A Review of the Sub-provisions of the Criminal Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 645-659. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100041
[4]	RAN Bo. From the Perspective of “Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation” Re-discussion on the Effect of Preclusion of the Self-admission System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 177-185.
[5]	DONG Jing-shu. On Puzzles in Basic Norm[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 64-70.
[6]	LIU Ting-hua. The Economic Basis for Principle of Changed Circumstances[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 85-89.
[7]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[8]	CHEN Cheng. Demonstration on Civil Incapacity of Persons in Custody: A Survey Based on Psychology, Legal System and Judicial Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 84-91.
[9]	TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.
[10]	XU Jun-ke. Private International Law and International Trade Usoge[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 67-73.
[11]	LIAO Yong-an, ZHAO Xiao-wei. The Comparative Study of Civil Expense of Proceeding System between Japan and China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 41-47.
[12]	MA Liu-ying. On Amelioration of the System of Civil Witness in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 87-90.
[13]	SHAO Ming. Research on the Civil Suit[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 13-19.
[14]	ZHANG Ji-cheng. Logic Foundation of Matter-of-Fact Inference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(2): 74-78.
[15]	CHEN Hong-wei. The Memoirs of a Survivor: A Text Narrating the Human Disaster[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 91-94.
[16]	XIAO Jian-guo, XIAO Jian-guang. Research on the Trial Committee in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 60-66.
[17]	MAO Ling. Research on the Civil jurisdiction system[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 26-32.
[18]	ZHANG Kang-zhi. The Moral Appeals in Administration Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 1-4,16.