YANG Binbin. The Subject Expression, Logical Relation and Construction Requirement of Institutional Superiority Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 11-18. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010013
Citation: YANG Binbin. The Subject Expression, Logical Relation and Construction Requirement of Institutional Superiority Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 11-18. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010013

The Subject Expression, Logical Relation and Construction Requirement of Institutional Superiority Discourse

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010013
  • Received Date: 2024-01-05
  • Publish Date: 2024-08-01
  • The discourse of institutional advantages of socialism with Chinese characteristics entails many concepts, conclusions and propositions. It is the tool carrier to realize the transformation of institutional advantages into governance effectiveness. The main body expression of the system advantage discourse is manifested through the inner implication of academism, the significance of politicization and the practical value of popularization. The existence of institutional discourse clarifies the interactive picture among academia, politics and socialization. It reflects the essence of the will of the party, the country and the people, and deepens the running thread of the ruling law of the Communist Party, the law of socialist construction and the law of human society development. The construction of institutional predominance discourse should take the explanatory power of academic discourse as the starting point and enhance the scientific support of institutional predominance discourse. The leadership of political discourse should be emphasized and the political position of institutional discourse should be firmly established. We should take the cohesive force of the mass discourse as the means to promote the popular narrative of the institutional dominant discourse.

     

  • [1]
    杨彬彬. 中国特色社会主义制度优势话语的存在形态与建构逻辑[J]. 探索,2022(2):27-38.
    [2]
    秦宣. 正确处理政治话语与学术话语的关系[J]. 中国青年社会科学,2019,38(3):9-13.
    [3]
    郭忠华. 知识分形与概念社会化[J]. 中国社会科学评价,2020(1):4-9.
    [4]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2012.
    [5]
    约瑟夫. 权力大未来[M]. 王吉美,译. 北京:中信出版社,2012.
    [6]
    张曙光. 现代性论域及其中国话语[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2010.
    [7]
    中共中央党史和文献研究院. 十九大以来重要文献选编(上)[M]. 北京:中央文献出版社,2019.
    [8]
    习近平. 习近平著作选读(第二卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2023.
    [9]
    毛泽东. 毛泽东选集(第三卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1991.
    [10]
    中共中央党史和文献研究院. 十九大以来重要文献选编(中)[M]. 北京:中央文献出版社,2021.
    [11]
    习近平. 习近平谈治国理政(第三卷)[M]. 北京:外文出版社,2020.
    [12]
    中共中央党史和文献研究院. 十八大以来重要文献选编(下)[M]. 北京:中央文献出版社,2018.
    [13]
    中共中央文献研究室. 改革开放三十年重要文献选编(上)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2008.
    [14]
    习近平. 习近平谈治国理政(第四卷)[M]. 北京:外文出版社,2022.
    [15]
    中共中央文献研究室. 建国以来重要文献选编(第十八册)[M]. 北京:中央文献出版社,1998.
    [16]
    中共中央文献研究室. 十五大以来重要文献选编(中)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2001.
    [17]
    胡刚. 中国共产党百年伟大社会革命的理论意涵与历史思考[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(1):1-10.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIN Haixuan, WU Yuanhua. Reflection and Construction of Marx and Agamben’s “Free Man” Subjects From the Perspective of Biopolitics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 115-128. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100057
    [2]REN Ran, GAO Ge. Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 94-103. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030
    [3]TANG Qingye. On the Construction of China’s Poverty Governance Discourse for International Communication[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 70-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110042
    [4]HU Shufen, HUANG Zhigao. Logical Relationships and Practical Requirements of “Two Answers” to Jumping Out of the Historical Cyclical Rate[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 22-30. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023080050
    [5]WANG Qian, WU Jiahua. The Logic, Value Implication, Times Requirements of the Self-reform of the Communist Party of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 681-688. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120067
    [6]WU Yuan-zheng, FENG De-zheng. The Attitudinal Meaning and Value Construction in Multimodal Ecological Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 677-684. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100139
    [7]WANG Kang. The Principle and Approach of Promoting Self Revolution to Strengthen the Party in New Era[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 381-388. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030065
    [8]LIU Fei-fei, CHANG Chen-guang. Discourse Strategies of Affiliating Writers with Putative Readers in Newspaper Editorials: An Individuation Perspective in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 44-50. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021010020
    [9]LIU Yang, WANG Bo-cheng. Subject Advantage and Initiative Connection: The Action Logic of Cadres Stationed in Villages in Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 111-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021100107
    [10]LU Ying. On the Essence,the Feature and the Relationship of the Subjectivity and the Emphasis in the Utterance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 26-37.
    [11]YANG Bing-jun, HU Dong-ming. A Sketch of the Co-constructing Relationship between Language and Emotion[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(2): 8-15.
    [12]CHEN Fu-sheng. Review and Critique of the Human Nature Foundation of Private Law System——On Historical Evolution and Contemporary Construction of Civil Subject[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(6): 74-77,84.
    [13]MA Fu-yun. The Change of China's Household Registration System and Its Inherent Logic[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 100-104.
    [14]SHEN Wen-jing. Constructing Discursive Identity: A Critical Analysis of Nadsat in A Clockwork Orange[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 35-40.
    [15]WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
    [16]XIN Zhi-ying. Intersubjectivity-constructing Resources in Academic Texts: Identification,Assessment and Application——Comments on Hyland's Model of Metadiscourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 23-28.
    [17]LI Jie-yuan. Personal Pronouns as Means of Relation-Building in Advertising Discourse: An English-Chinese Contrastive Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 104-108.
    [18]GUO De-xia. On the Relation of Subject and Curriculum Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 129-134.
    [19]ZOU Hai-yu. Construct a System of Financial Transfer and Defrayment between Governments in China According the Demands of Market-economy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 84-87,91.
    [20]WANG Xiangqian. On the Restructuring of the Trade Union System Applicable to Collective Contract Requirement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2000, 16(3): 73-76.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 韩桥生,姜益琳. 新时代中国共产党大党形象国际传播话语的生成逻辑、构成样态和优化方略. 世界社会主义研究. 2025(02): 14-25+125 .
    2. 郭锴. 中国共产党忧患意识的哲学透视. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(03): 8-14 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060500100015002000
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.4 %FULLTEXT: 7.4 %META: 89.7 %META: 89.7 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.2 %其他: 2.2 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %San Mateo: 0.0 %San Mateo: 0.0 %三明: 0.0 %三明: 0.0 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %丽水: 3.0 %丽水: 3.0 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %北京: 1.8 %北京: 1.8 %华盛顿州: 0.0 %华盛顿州: 0.0 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南平: 0.1 %南平: 0.1 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台州: 1.9 %台州: 1.9 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉林: 1.1 %吉林: 1.1 %咸阳: 2.0 %咸阳: 2.0 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 1.2 %嘉兴: 1.2 %大连: 1.4 %大连: 1.4 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %宁德: 0.9 %宁德: 0.9 %宁波: 1.2 %宁波: 1.2 %安康: 0.6 %安康: 0.6 %宜春: 0.3 %宜春: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宿迁: 2.4 %宿迁: 2.4 %密蘇里城: 0.2 %密蘇里城: 0.2 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广元: 0.3 %广元: 0.3 %广安: 0.3 %广安: 0.3 %广州: 3.2 %广州: 3.2 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %徐州: 0.9 %徐州: 0.9 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.7 %德阳: 0.7 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 2.1 %扬州: 2.1 %抚州: 2.4 %抚州: 2.4 %文昌: 0.9 %文昌: 0.9 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %无锡: 1.1 %无锡: 1.1 %日照: 0.5 %日照: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %杭州: 2.7 %杭州: 2.7 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %榆林: 0.9 %榆林: 0.9 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %汕头: 0.6 %汕头: 0.6 %江门: 0.9 %江门: 0.9 %池州: 0.8 %池州: 0.8 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %泉州: 0.6 %泉州: 0.6 %泰州: 0.5 %泰州: 0.5 %泸州: 0.6 %泸州: 0.6 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %海东: 0.2 %海东: 0.2 %海西: 0.2 %海西: 0.2 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %淮北: 0.9 %淮北: 0.9 %淮南: 0.2 %淮南: 0.2 %淮安: 0.6 %淮安: 0.6 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %渭南: 1.0 %渭南: 1.0 %湖州: 1.6 %湖州: 1.6 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘西: 0.6 %湘西: 0.6 %漯河: 1.3 %漯河: 1.3 %漳州: 1.2 %漳州: 1.2 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 1.5 %珠海: 1.5 %盐城: 0.9 %盐城: 0.9 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %绍兴: 1.1 %绍兴: 1.1 %绵阳: 0.9 %绵阳: 0.9 %自贡: 0.3 %自贡: 0.3 %舟山: 0.8 %舟山: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 5.8 %芒廷维尤: 5.8 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.2 %荆州: 0.2 %荆门: 1.3 %荆门: 1.3 %莆田: 0.4 %莆田: 0.4 %营口: 0.9 %营口: 0.9 %葫芦岛: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.6 %蚌埠: 0.4 %蚌埠: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.7 %衢州: 0.7 %襄阳: 1.5 %襄阳: 1.5 %西宁: 4.5 %西宁: 4.5 %西安: 2.8 %西安: 2.8 %许昌: 0.0 %许昌: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %辽阳: 0.4 %辽阳: 0.4 %连云港: 1.5 %连云港: 1.5 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.6 %邵阳: 0.6 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %郴州: 1.5 %郴州: 1.5 %酒泉: 0.0 %酒泉: 0.0 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %金华: 0.7 %金华: 0.7 %铁岭: 1.6 %铁岭: 1.6 %锦州: 0.5 %锦州: 0.5 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %随州: 0.4 %随州: 0.4 %雅安: 0.3 %雅安: 0.3 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %鞍山: 5.3 %鞍山: 5.3 %驻马店: 0.0 %驻马店: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.9 %黄冈: 0.9 %黄南: 0.5 %黄南: 0.5 %黄山: 0.0 %黄山: 0.0 %其他其他San Mateo三明三门峡上海中山丽水信阳六安兰州北京华盛顿州南京南平南昌厦门台州合肥吉林咸阳哥伦布唐山嘉兴大连天津宁德宁波安康宜春宣城宿迁密蘇里城常州常德平顶山广元广安广州廊坊张家口徐州德州德阳成都扬州抚州文昌新乡无锡日照朝阳杭州枣庄格兰特县榆林武汉汕头江门池州沃思堡沈阳泉州泰州泸州济南海东海西淄博淮北淮南淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湘西漯河漳州烟台珠海盐城盘锦石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴绵阳自贡舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆州荆门莆田营口葫芦岛蚌埠衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安许昌贵阳辽阳连云港邯郸邵阳郑州郴州酒泉重庆金华铁岭锦州长沙阳泉随州雅安青岛鞍山驻马店鹰潭黄冈黄南黄山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2093) PDF downloads(68) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return