Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government

TANG De-long

Volume 23 Issue 2

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2007 > 23(2): 61-65

TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.

Citation:

TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.

TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.

Citation:

TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.

PDF( 241 KB)

Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government

TANG De-long

China Social News Press, Beijing 100032, China

Received Date: 2007-01-16
Available Online: 2021-07-03

Abstract

Abstract

Limited government is defined as a series of principles and theories mostly based on liberalism. Limited government is also accepted in history as some sort of governing pattern responding society reality appealing. With respect to solving the problem of government-market relationship and power-right relationship, the basic claims of limited government deeply involve viewing from limited power of government, limited function of government, and limited size of government. In modern times, limited government is a prevalent appealing of al 1 countries in the world. For Chinese government, its reality appealing is to establish a new government mode that is limited and efficient.
- limited government,
- liberalism,
- reality appealing

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SU Yun-ting. Behind the Epidemic of NCP: A Realist Review of Global Governance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 60-67.
[2]	WANG Fu-fang. Embodied Realism: Theoretical Controversies and Challenges[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 20-25.
[3]	GAO Ya-bin, WANG Wei-ying. Opening the New Areas of Ｒealism for Science Fiction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 89-92.
[4]	YANG Guang. The Combination of Rights: The Discussion on the Pre-emptive Right in Limited Liability Company[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 86-93.
[5]	LU Jun, DUAN Xiang-wei. On the Absolute Freedom of Network Behaviour——Analysis of Network Behavior Based on Marxism's View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 88-92.
[6]	LIANG Feng. The Crisis of Contemporary Individualism and the Breakthrough of Classic Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 80-84,112.
[7]	SHI Li-rong, LIU Yu. The Limited Intervention and Reasonable Extension of the Supervisory Authority of Government by Organizational Boundary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 108-112.
[8]	LI Tong-yu. On Debate:the Material Is Limited or Unlimited——The Second of Series Papers on Debate between Science and Philosophy in the 1980's[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 62-69,97.
[9]	LI Tong-yu. Argument on the Finite or Infinite of the Universe——The Debate between the Science and Philosophy in 1980s[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 55-62.
[10]	ZHANG Ti-kun, SONG Ying-hui. The Misreading and Methodology Criticism of “Chinese Liberalism Literature”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 44-49.
[11]	ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
[12]	GAO Yong-zhou. People Combination in Limited Liability Corporation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 59-64.
[13]	PANG Jin-you. Analysis of the Weak Government Theory of Modern Western Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 32-37.
[14]	LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.
[15]	ZHANG Qi-qiang. On Buchanan's Theories of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 51-54.
[16]	CHEN Yu-wu. Rethinking Yan Fu's Charactericistics of Liberalists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 125-130.
[17]	LI Yi. On the Critical Legal Studies of International Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 52-54.
[18]	XIAO Yong-bing. On the Selection of the Patterns of Board's Restrictionover Joint-stock Company of Limited Liability[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 42-46.
[19]	FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.
[20]	ZHANG Kang-zhi. The Moral Appeals in Administration Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 1-4,16.