Intersubjectivity-constructing Resources in Academic Texts: Identification,Assessment and Application——Comments on Hyland's Model of Metadiscourse

XIN Zhi-ying

Volume 27 Issue 2

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2011 > 27(2): 23-28

XIN Zhi-ying. Intersubjectivity-constructing Resources in Academic Texts: Identification,Assessment and Application——Comments on Hyland's Model of Metadiscourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 23-28.

Citation:

XIN Zhi-ying. Intersubjectivity-constructing Resources in Academic Texts: Identification,Assessment and Application——Comments on Hyland's Model of Metadiscourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 23-28.

Citation:

XIN Zhi-ying. Intersubjectivity-constructing Resources in Academic Texts: Identification,Assessment and Application——Comments on Hyland's Model of Metadiscourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 23-28.

PDF( 288 KB)

Intersubjectivity-constructing Resources in Academic Texts: Identification,Assessment and Application——Comments on Hyland's Model of Metadiscourse

XIN Zhi-ying

School of Foreign Languages Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received Date: 2010-12-08
Available Online: 2021-06-24

Abstract

Abstract

The article aims to identify, describe and assess intersubjectivity-constructing resources in academic discourse.Intersubjectivity is the author's indirect manipulation of the interactants involved in the academic activity, i.e.the author and the reader.The article holds that Hyland's model of metadiscourse is an effective approach to describing and assessing intersubjectivity-constructing resources in academic texts and of pedagogical significance.On the one hand, the systematicity of the model enables valid description of intersubjectivity-construction patterns in given texts and thus helps to analyse academic texts on the dimension of intersubjectivity construction.On the other hand, the model shows how to construct appropriate intersubjectivity in academic writing and facilitates to foster the writer's awareness of intersubjectivity-construction and strategies to build intersubjectivity.
- academic texts,
- intersubjectivity,
- model of metadiscourse

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	DING Fengling, LIN Bingyan. The Binary Model of Data Exchanges and Its Legal Implementation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 78-90. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100085
[2]	YANG Binbin. The Subject Expression, Logical Relation and Construction Requirement of Institutional Superiority Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 11-18. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010013
[3]	BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
[4]	MIAO Ning. Discourse Epistemics: An Integrated Study of Discourse and Knowledge[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 132-137.
[5]	BU Zhan-ting, Wu Ya-jing. The Cross-disciplinary Studies and Frontiers of Discourse Linguistics in the New Era—Review on Theoretical Studies at the 7th National Discourse Linguistics Conference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(4): 1-6.
[6]	WANG Xin. Research on the Discourse Mode of “HAI NP NE” from the Perspective of Speakers' Attitudes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 43-49.
[7]	ZHANG Dan-dan, ZHANG Jing-yuan. A Scientometric Review of International and Domestic Metadiscourse Research Using CiteSpace[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 9-16.
[8]	HE Zhong-qing, YAN Yu-fei. Metadiscourse Studies in the Past Three Decades: Development, Problems and Prospect[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 22-29.
[9]	ZHAO Kai, LI Jing. The Complementation of Discourse Analysis and Schemata Construction—The Application of Cognitive Patterns in Interpreting E. E. Cummings' Poems[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 28-32,64.
[10]	KUANG Zhan, YANG Yi-long. The Meta-redundant Effect of Grammatical Metaphor[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 17-22.
[11]	TIAN Hai-long. Mingling and Debating Practices of Academic Discourse Exchange[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(5): 1-6.
[12]	LIANG Xin-liang. Usage Features of Nominal Groups in Chinese MA Students' Academic Texts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 28-32.
[13]	XIE Shu-nuan. Comparative Study of Grammatical Metaphor in Chinese and Foreign Academic Discourses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 16-20.
[14]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. On the Application of Statutory Undertaking in Multi-party Tort Liability System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 120-126.
[15]	WANG Guan. Mobilized-participation and Intersubjectivity: A Research on the Residents' Committee's Community Participation Strategy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 98-102.
[16]	CHEN Ming-fang. Criticism in Academic Discourse Literature Review across the Disciplines[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 17-22.
[17]	YU Hui. Lexical Cohesion Patterns and Genre Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 109-113.
[18]	PAN Jian-hong, LI Xiao-yang. The Lost of Scientific Research Personnel and Rebuilding of Academic View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 146-149.
[19]	CENG Lei. An Approach to the Metaphorical Meanings of the Tense of Projecting Verbs in English Academic Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 104-108.