The Binary Model of Data Exchanges and Its Legal Implementation

DING Fengling; LIN Bingyan

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100085

Volume 40 Issue 6

Dec. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2024 > 40(6): 78-90

DING Fengling, LIN Bingyan. The Binary Model of Data Exchanges and Its Legal Implementation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 78-90. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100085

Citation:

DING Fengling, LIN Bingyan. The Binary Model of Data Exchanges and Its Legal Implementation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 78-90. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100085

Citation:

PDF( 967 KB)

The Binary Model of Data Exchanges and Its Legal Implementation

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100085

Law School, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China

Received Date: 2023-10-27
Publish Date: 2024-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

The development of data exchanges promote the circulation and sharing of data, which makes the value of data be realized. However, at present, the for-profit data exchanges established in various regions of our country are facing development difficulties. Due to unclear positioning and functional vacancy, for-profit data exchanges have faced problems such as homogeneous competition and repeated construction, which lead to the development is not in line with expectations. It is a feasible solution to solve the dilemma of the current development of data exchanges to construct the binary model of mutual development of for-profit and non-profit data exchanges. For-profit and non-profit data exchanges have both commonalities and characteristics, which need to be regulated by classification. Service attributes and basic rights and obligations are the common rules of binary data exchanges. In terms of characteristic rules, in order to ensure the compliant and efficient development of data transactions, differentiated regulation should be implemented on binary data exchanges from aspects such as market access system and regulatory system.
- data transaction,
- data exchanges,
- profitability,
- legal attribute

FullText(HTML)

References(56)

References

[1]	RODERICK L. Discipline and power in the digital age:The case of the US consumer data broker industry [J]. Critical Sociology,2014,40(5):729-746. doi: 10.1177/0896920513501350
[2]	ROBIN V K,HAN W B L,REBECCA F, et al. The European health data space fails to bridge digital divides [EB/OL]. BMJ(2022-07-08)[2024-07-07]. https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-071913.full.
[3]	中国信息通信研究院. 数据价值化与数据要素市场发展报告(2021年)[EB/OL]. 中国信息通信研究院(2021-05-27)[2023-10-20]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/ztbg/202105/P020210527392862309670.pdf.
[4]	贵阳市人民政府. 贵阳大数据交易所会员突破两千家[EB/OL]. 贵阳日报(2018-03-29)[2023-07-08]. http://www.guizhou.gov.cn/home/sxdt/202109/t20210913_70108086.html?isMobile=true.
[5]	罗曼,田牧. 理想很丰满现实很骨感贵阳大数据交易所这六年[N]. 证券时报,2021-07-12(A1).
[6]	超九成数据交易来自“场外”?专家为合规窘境破局建言献策[EB/OL]. 南方都市报(2022-04-06)[2023-10-20]. https://static.nfapp.southcn.com/content/202204/06/c6372382.html.
[7]	欧阳日辉. 我国多层次数据要素交易市场体系建设机制与路径[J]. 江西社会科学,2022,42(3):64-75,206-207.
[8]	何培育,王潇睿. 我国大数据交易平台的现实困境及对策研究[J]. 现代情报,2017,37(8):98-105,153.
[9]	杨艳,王理,廖祖君. 数据要素市场化配置与区域经济发展——基于数据交易平台的视角[J]. 社会科学研究,2021(6):38-52.
[10]	张敏. 交易安全视域下我国大数据交易的法律监管[J]. 情报杂志,2017,36(2):127-133.
[11]	杨东,高清纯. 加快建设全国统一大市场背景下数据交易平台规制研究[J]. 法治研究:1-14.
[12]	张富利,李璐婷. 公共性视角下超级平台互联互通路径探析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(4):124-132.
[13]	查先进,严亚兰. 再论信息市场失灵与政府干预[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2001(4):8-10.
[14]	刘春湘,李自如. 国外非营利组织研究述评[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版),2006,12(5):582-586.
[15]	秦晖. 政府与企业以外的现代化——中西公益事业史比较研究[M]. 北京:浙江人民出版社,1999.
[16]	陈宝良. 中国的社与会[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,1996.
[17]	贾西津. 国际比较视野中的非营利部门——《全球公民社会:非营利部门视界》评介[J]. 管理世界,2002(11):152-153.
[18]	刘金河. 权力流散:平台崛起与社会权力结构变迁[J]. 探索与争鸣,2022(2):118-132,179.
[19]	ZUBOFF S. Big other:Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization [J]. Journal of Information Technology,2015,30(1):75-89. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.5
[20]	谷佳慧. 数字时代正义的内涵变迁及法治保障[J]. 北方法学,2023,17(5):131-145.
[21]	尼尔. 技术垄断:文化向技术投降[M]. 何道宽,译. 北京:中信出版社,2019.
[22]	叶明,王岩. 人工智能时代数据孤岛破解法律制度研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,40(5):69-77.
[23]	徐珉川. 论公共数据开放的可信治理[J]. 比较法研究,2021(6):143-156.
[24]	贵阳大数据交易所. 贵阳大数据交易所702公约[EB/OL]. 贵阳大数据交易所 (2015-05-16)[2023-10-20]. https://www.docin.com/p-1989810335.html.
[25]	刘宇. 《民法典》视野下的大数据交易:过程控制、性质认定与法律适用[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报,2022(3):96-110.
[26]	郭明军,安小米,洪学海. 关于规范大数据交易充分释放大数据价值的研究[J]. 电子政务,2018(1):31-37.
[27]	维克托,肯尼思. 大数据时代:生活、工作与思维的大变革[M]. 盛杨燕,周涛,译. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2012.
[28]	GOEL S,HOFMAN J M,LAHAIE S,et al. Predicting consumer behavior with web search [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2010,107(41):17486-17490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005962107
[29]	杨琴. 数字经济时代数据流通利用的数权激励[J]. 政治与法律,2021(12):12-25.
[30]	梅夏英. 数据交易的法律范畴界定与实现路径[J]. 比较法研究,2022(6):13-27.
[31]	丁晓东. 数据交易如何破局——数据要素市场中的阿罗信息悖论与法律应对[J]. 东方法学,2022(2):144-158.
[32]	包晓丽,杜万里. 数据可信交易体系的制度构建——基于场内交易视角[J]. 电子政务,2023(6):38-50.
[33]	胡文涛. 我国个人敏感信息界定之构想[J]. 中国法学,2018(5):235-254.
[34]	江波,张亚男. 大数据语境下的个人信息合理使用原则[J]. 交大法学,2018(3):108-121.
[35]	徐玖玖. 数据交易法律规制基本原则的构建:反思与进路[J]. 图书馆论坛,2021,41(2):77-88.
[36]	席月民. 数据安全:数据信托目的及其实现机制[J]. 法学杂志,2021,42(9):29-41,52.
[37]	吴泓. 信赖理念下的个人信息使用与保护[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2018,21(1):22-36.
[38]	杨秋宇. 信托受托人忠实义务的功能诠释与规范重塑[J]. 法学研究,2023,45(3):149-167.
[39]	倪楠. 欧盟模式下个人数据共享的建构与借鉴——以数据中介机构为视角[J]. 法治研究,2023(2):22-33.
[40]	What is big data analytics? [EB/OL]. (2024-04-05)[2024-07-02]. https://www.ibm.com/topics/big-data-analytics?mhsrc=ibmsearch_a&mhq=Big%20Data%20Volume%20Variety%20Value%20Velocity.
[41]	林扬千. 关于大数据意识形态问题的思考:“数字利维坦”的生成与治理[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(5):576-582.
[42]	中国社会科学院语言研究所. 现代汉语词典[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2021.
[43]	范健,王建文. 商法的价值、源流及本体(第二版)[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[44]	苏号朋. 民法总论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2006.
[45]	王枫云. 商法的基本原则探析[J]. 江汉论坛,2003(5):113-116.
[46]	LESTER M S & HELMUT K A. Defining the Nonprofit Sector:A Cross - national Analysis [M]. England:Manchester University Press,1997.
[47]	WEISBROD B. Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in Three-Sector Economy [C]// PHELPS,E. S. (ed.). Altruism,Morality and Economic Theory. New York:Russel Sage,1975:197-223.
[48]	SALAMON L. Rethinking public management:Third-Party government and the changing forms of government action [J]. Public Policy,1981,29(3):255-275.
[49]	张新民,杨连专. 经济法学[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014.
[50]	李翃楠. 我国市场准入制度中的所有制歧视分析[J]. 当代财经,2016(4):12-19.
[51]	雷震文. 以平台为中心的大数据交易监管制度构想[J]. 现代管理科学,2018(9):19-21.
[52]	王卫,张梦君,王晶. 国内外大数据交易平台调研分析[J]. 情报杂志,2019,38(2):181-186,194.
[53]	张敏. 包容审慎监管:数据交易的平台监管进路研究[J]. 河北学刊,2023,43(1):201-209.
[54]	丁凤玲,彭建. 还数于民:实现个人数据自决的“新”数据中介[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,37(4):74-84.
[55]	丁凤玲. 个人数据治理模式的选择:个人、国家还是集体[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,35(1):64-76.
[56]	谢鸿飞. 非营利法人的类型定位与盈余分配——兼评游道国诉蚌埠现代妇科医院、陈建森、吴建文公司盈余分配纠纷案[J]. 人民司法(案例),2017(20):13-20.