The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek

LIANG Feng

Volume 23 Issue 3

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2007 > 23(3): 149-155,161

LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.

Citation:

LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.

LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.

Citation:

LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.

PDF( 477 KB)

The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek

LIANG Feng

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2007-06-20
Available Online: 2021-07-03

Abstract

Abstract

Berlin confronted a theoretical paradox between Monism and Pluralism. All of them, Berlin and Raz, Rawls and Habermas, could not avoid completely the tension of the two values. But Hayek held negative values that can coexist with pluralism harmoniously in modern society. Hayek believed that the crisis of liberalism was not the internal paradox between monism and pluralism, but the crisis that False Liberalism challenge True Liberalism.
- Liberalism,
- Monism,
- Pluralism,
- Constructivist Rationalism

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	DING Zi-jiang. Comparative Method and New Diversity-oriented Comparativism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 52-60,67.
[2]	LU Jun, DUAN Xiang-wei. On the Absolute Freedom of Network Behaviour——Analysis of Network Behavior Based on Marxism's View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 88-92.
[3]	WANG Xue-ming. The Checking Mechanism in the Polysystem Theory: A Perspective of Eco-translatology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 30-33,45.
[4]	LIANG Feng. The Crisis of Contemporary Individualism and the Breakthrough of Classic Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 80-84,112.
[5]	ZHANG Ti-kun, SONG Ying-hui. The Misreading and Methodology Criticism of “Chinese Liberalism Literature”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 44-49.
[6]	ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
[7]	MENG Xiang-chun. On Linguistic Imperialism of English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 164-167.
[8]	PANG Jin-you. Analysis of the Weak Government Theory of Modern Western Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 32-37.
[9]	TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.
[10]	WANG Hong-zhe. The Legal Philosophy of Critical Rationalism: Albert's Opinions and Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 74-79.
[11]	CHEN Yu-wu. Rethinking Yan Fu's Charactericistics of Liberalists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 125-130.
[12]	LI Yi. On the Critical Legal Studies of International Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 52-54.
[13]	WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Judicial Activism in WTO Dispute Settlement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 28-36.
[14]	HU Yi-cheng. The Right Evaluation of Western Economics from Centralized Labor Value Theory to Productive Force Value Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 56-60.
[15]	FENG Ying. To Achieve Liberty Step by Step——On YAN Fu's Thoughts of Social Change[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 63-66.
[16]	HU Yi-cheng. A Research of the History of Marx and Engels' Labor Theory of Value[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 47-51.
[17]	FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.