A Systemic Functional Linguistic Re-interpretation of Modality Types

CHANG Chenguang; LI Meizi

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030128

Volume 39 Issue 4

Aug. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2023 > 39(4): 438-445

CHANG Chenguang, LI Meizi. A Systemic Functional Linguistic Re-interpretation of Modality Types[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 438-445. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030128

Citation:

CHANG Chenguang, LI Meizi. A Systemic Functional Linguistic Re-interpretation of Modality Types[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 438-445. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030128

Citation:

PDF( 1050 KB)

A Systemic Functional Linguistic Re-interpretation of Modality Types

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030128

School of Foreign Languages, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 517205, China

Received Date: 2023-03-27
Available Online: 2023-06-30
Publish Date: 2023-08-25

Abstract

Abstract

In SFL, modality refers to the semantic space between positive and negative poles, and it is regarded as an important interpersonal resource. However, there are still problems with the systemic functional description of the modality system. For example, the classification of the modality system manifests simplicity and vagueness; discussions of subjectivity and objectivity of modality appear contradictory; and the metafunctional diversity of the modality system is ignored. The ambiguity of the theory and system leads to inconsistent typological accounts of modality. In resolving these problems, we contribute to a better understanding of modality, thereby providing an integrated typological framework for its description. The study finds that modality can be categorized into three major types based on two parameters. There are three different meanings given to the term “subjectivity”, and Halliday’s account of subjective and objective modality assumes speaker’s involvement and reflects varying levels of commitment on the part of the speaker. The differences between modality types and their distinction in terms of subjectivity and objectivity are gradual rather than categorical. They form a continuum along the cline of interpersonal and ideational metafunction.
- modality types,
- metafunctions of language,
- subjectivity and objectivity of modality,
- functionality of modality

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	HALLIDAY M A K. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English [J]. Foundations of Language, 1970, 6(3):322-361.
[2]	杨曙,李妹惠. 汉语情态研究述评:回顾、反思、趋势[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(2):179-184.
[3]	HALLIDAY M A K & Matthiessen C M I M. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar （4th ed.）[M]. London: Routledge, 2014.
[4]	KADOOKA, K-I. A contrastive study of the English and Japanese modality systems[C] // KADOOKA K-I. Japanese Mood and Modality in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2021: 101-132.
[5]	张玉波,杨炳钧. 小句极性的元功能归属[J]. 外语教学与研究,2019,51(2):225-238,320.
[6]	LYONS J. Semantics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[7]	BYBEE J L. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form[M]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1985.
[8]	VAN DER AUWERA J & PLUNGIAN V A. Modality’s semantic map [J]. Linguistic Typology, 1998, 2(1):79-124.
[9]	PALMER F R. Mood and Modality (2nd ed.)[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[10]	赵春丽,石定栩. 语气、情态与句子功能类型[J]. 外语教学与研究,2011,43(4):483-500,639.
[11]	杨曙,常晨光. 情态的系统功能语言学考量[J]. 外语学刊,2011,160(3):27-31. doi: 10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2011.03.019
[12]	HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. London: Arnold, 1985.
[13]	HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar （2nd ed. ）[M]. London: Arnold, 1994.
[14]	HALLIDAY M A K & Matthiessen C. An Introduction to Functional Grammar （3rd ed. ）[M]. London: Arnold, 2004.
[15]	PERKINS M R. Modal Expressions in English[M]. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
[16]	COATES J. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries[M]. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
[17]	WRIGHT G H V. An Essay in Modal Logic[M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1951.
[18]	BYBEE J L, PERKINS R D & PAGLIUCA W. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
[19]	JESPERSEN O. The Philosophy of Grammar[M]. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1924.
[20]	PALMER F R. Mood and Modality[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[21]	VERHULST A,DEPRAETERE I & HEYVAERT L. Source and strength of modality:an empirical study of root should,ought to and be supposed to in present-day british English [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, 55(11):210-225.
[22]	FILLMORE C J. The case for case[C] // BACH E & HARMS R T. Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968: 1-88.
[23]	FOLEY W A &VAN VALIN R D. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
[24]	HENGEVELD K. Layers and operators in functional grammar [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1989, 25(1):127-157. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012123
[25]	VERSTRAETE J C. Subjective and objective modality:interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2001, 33(10):1505-1528. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7
[26]	HOYE L. Adverbs and Modality in English[M]. London: Longman, 1997.
[27]	NUYTS J. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2001, 33(3):383-400. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6
[28]	NUYTS J. Notions of (inter)subjectivity [J]. English Text Construction, 2012, 5(1):53-76. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.04nuy
[29]	常晨光. 英语中的人际语法隐喻[J]. 外语与外语教学,2001(7):6-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2001.07.003
[30]	PALMER F R. Modality and the English Modals[M]. London: Longman, 1990.
[31]	NUYTS J. Analyses of the modal meanings[C] // NUYTS J & AUWERA J V D. The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016: 31-49.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Yubo, YANG Bingjun, DONG Baohua. Towards the Lexical Realization and the Grammatical System of the Finiteness in the Chinese Clause: A Functional Typological Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 63-74. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090096
[2]	CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
[3]	YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
[4]	XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
[5]	PANG Yu-tian, YANG Cai-ying. A Contrastive Study of Modal Features of Participant-oriented Bundles in Conclusions of English PhD Dissertations Written by Chinese and NSE Writers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 403-411. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030026
[6]	YANG Shu, LI Shu-hui. A Comprehensive Review of Studies on Modality in Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 179-184. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090112
[7]	WANG Yue-ping, DU Min. The Connotative Features and Functional Purpose of Language Choice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 264-272.
[8]	BAI Xin-jie. Research on the Economic and Political Attributes of Language[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 32-36.
[9]	WEI Yin-xia. A Contrastive Study of Modal Responsibility in the English Translated Texts of The Analects by Arthur Waley and D. C. Lau[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 28-37.
[10]	LIANG Hong-yan, ZENG Lei. Translation Studies of Projection: A Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 12-16,22.
[11]	WU Nan, ZHANG Jing-yuan. Exploration of Gender Differences in Speech Manner from the Perspective of Interpersonal Metafunction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 18-24.
[12]	LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
[13]	XIA Hong. English Dynamic Modality for Logical Argumentation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 50-53.
[14]	QI Xi. English Deontic Modality and the Construal of Attitude and Stance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 18-24.
[15]	LIANG Ping, KONG Ling-zhang. Empirical Research on the Types of Labor Dispute Reasons[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 55-60,87.
[16]	LI Zhong-hua. Research on Probability from a Systemic Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 13-16.
[17]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
[18]	XU Ying. A Detailed Analysis of Metafunctions of “Education for Independent Thought”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 107-111,124.
[19]	HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
[20]	WANG Peng. The Influence of Speaker's Sex and Age on Modality Type of COULD in English-Chinese Translation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 119-127.