YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
Citation: YANG Lin-xiu. Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 517-524. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063

Appliability of Systemic Functional Linguistics in Evidential Studies

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070063
  • Received Date: 2022-07-19
    Available Online: 2022-10-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-25
  • “Appliability” has been the goal of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The development of SFL has proved that SFL can provide theoretical perspective and methodology for interpreting many linguistic phenomena. Starting with some key notions in SFL, this paper proves the great applicability of SFL in evidential studies. The study indicates SFL has opened new ways to examine evidentiality comprehensively and systematically by providing theoretical support and multi-dimentional perspectives.

     

  • [1]
    BOAS F. Handbook of American Indian Languages [M]. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1911.
    [2]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Methods-techniques-problems [C] // HALLIDAY M A K & WEBSTER J, Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Continuum: London, 2009: 59-86.
    [3]
    胡壮麟. 解读韩礼德的Appliable Linguistics [M] 四川外语学院学报, 2007(6): 1-6.
    [4]
    黄国文, 辛志英. 绪论: 解读“系统功能语言学”[C]//黄国文. 系统功能语言学研究现状和发展趋势. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2012: 1-25.
    [5]
    朱永生. 适用语言学:定义、基本特征、形成过程与发展趋势[J]. 外语学刊,2012(4):4-40. doi: 10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2012.04.007
    [6]
    HALLIDAY M A K,ZHUANG H & YONGSHENG Z. Interviewing Prof. M. A. K. Halliday[J]. 中国外语,2010(6):17-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9382.2010.06.004
    [7]
    MAHBOOB A & K NIGHT N K. Appliable linguistics: an introduction[C]// M AHBOOB A & K NIGHT N K. Appliable Linguistics. Continuum: New York, 2010: 1-12.
    [8]
    PETER M. Book review:Appliable Linguistics [J]. Discourse & Society, 2012, 23(1):101-103.
    [9]
    谭欣,黄国文. 作为问题导向理论的适用语言学探究[J]. 外语电化教学,2020(4):46-50,8.
    [10]
    于晖. 作为“适用语言学”的系统功能语言学−忆韩礼德先生[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(3):23-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2018.03.011
    [11]
    辛志英. 系统功能适用语言学发展五十年回顾[J]. 中国外语,2012,9(3):16-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9382.2012.03.004
    [12]
    HALLIDAY M A K. On grammar and grammatics [C] // HASAN R, CLORAN C & BUTT D. Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice. Benjamin’s: Amsterdam, 1996: 1-38.
    [13]
    杨林秀. 国内言据性研究:现状与展望[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,36(6):64-68.
    [14]
    房红梅. 言据性的系统功能研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2005.
    [15]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. Routledge, 2004.
    [16]
    汤斌. 英语疫情新闻中言据性语篇特征的系统功能研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2007.
    [17]
    杨林秀. 英语科研论文中的言据性[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2009.
    [18]
    杨林秀. Evaluative functions of reporting evidentials in English research articles of Applied Linguistics[J]. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics,2013,3(2):119-126.
    [19]
    杨林秀. 英文学术论文中的作者身份构建:言据性视角[J]. 外语教学,2015,36(2):21-25. doi: 10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2015.02.005
    [20]
    高晴. 英语气候变化新闻中言据性的人际功能探析[J]. 佳木斯教育学院学报,2011(2):23,342.
    [21]
    廉梦甜. 汉语理论语言学学术论文中的言据性研究: 系统功能语言学视角[D]. 北京: 北京外国语大学, 2017.
    [22]
    廖巧云,翁馨. 言据性视域下的英语学术论文作者身份构建对比研究[J]. 西安外国语大学学报,2022,30(1):24-29,119.
    [23]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Explorations in the Functions of Language [M]. Arnold: London, 1973.
    [24]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London: World Publishing Corporation. 1999.
    [25]
    NUYTS J. Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure [J]. Linguistics, 1993(31):933-969.
    [26]
    MARTIN J R & ROSE D. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause [M]. Continuum: London, 2003.
    [27]
    MARTIN J R & WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Peiwen. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Healthcare Communication: Review and Prospect[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 75-82. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020077
    [2]GAO Shengwen. On the Ideological Construction of University Journal from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 112-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090061
    [3]HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
    [4]CHEN Yu-min, XU Ya-shan. The Functional Semantic Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Viewed from the History of Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 90-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090097
    [5]HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
    [6]BAO Xing-jia, LUO Zai-bing. A Logogenetic Study of Negative Polarity in English Academic Discourse: A SFL Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 533-542. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050035
    [7]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [8]LIU Yan. Readability Studies from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 11-18,27.
    [9]WANG Wen-feng, ZHANG Jing-yuan. Advances and Frontiers of Systemic Functional Linguistics Studies in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 24-29.
    [10]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Review of Transitivity Studies within Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 1-20.
    [11]CHEN Yu-min, WANG Lu-yao. A Contrastive Study of the English Translations of A New Account of Tales of the World—From the Perspective of Appraisal System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 29-36.
    [12]HUI Zhang-zheng. Theory and Practice of History Discourse Analysis—from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 33-38.
    [13]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [14]CHEN Hai-ye, ZHI Hong. Interpretation of Hemingway’s “Iceberg” Theory from Perspective of Systemic Functional Appliable Linguistics: Exemplified with Killers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(5): 41-47.
    [15]CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
    [16]GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
    [17]LI Zhong-hua. Research on Probability from a Systemic Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 13-16.
    [18]ZHOU Hong-ying. Non-arbitrariness of Language——an Interpretation from the Transitivity System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 101-106,116.
    [19]HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
    [20]HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060255075100125150
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.6 %FULLTEXT: 21.6 %META: 71.2 %META: 71.2 %PDF: 7.2 %PDF: 7.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.4 %其他: 9.4 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Grogol: 0.4 %Grogol: 0.4 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %Seattle: 2.2 %Seattle: 2.2 %万隆: 0.8 %万隆: 0.8 %上海: 2.6 %上海: 2.6 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 1.0 %嘉兴: 1.0 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天水围: 0.2 %天水围: 0.2 %天津: 3.7 %天津: 3.7 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %奥斯陆: 0.1 %奥斯陆: 0.1 %宣城: 1.4 %宣城: 1.4 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %忻州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.3 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 3.0 %扬州: 3.0 %新奥尔良: 0.7 %新奥尔良: 0.7 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 2.8 %杭州: 2.8 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %泗水: 0.4 %泗水: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 1.7 %温州: 1.7 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 8.7 %漯河: 8.7 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.9 %石家庄: 1.9 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %红磡: 0.1 %红磡: 0.1 %罗马: 0.2 %罗马: 0.2 %肇庆: 0.3 %肇庆: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.3 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 18.3 %西宁: 18.3 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %资阳: 0.1 %资阳: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 2.0 %郑州: 2.0 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 2.5 %长沙: 2.5 %雅加达: 0.4 %雅加达: 0.4 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaGrogolRochesterSaitamaSan JoseSeattle万隆上海东莞临汾丽水保定六安包头北京十堰华盛顿州南京南昌南通厦门台州合肥呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴圣地亚哥圣彼得堡大同大连天水围天津太原奥斯陆宣城常州平顶山广州开封张家口忻州悉尼成都扬州新奥尔良昆明杭州沈阳泗水洛阳济南海口淄博深圳温州湖州湛江漯河珠海盐城石家庄秦皇岛红磡罗马肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥菏泽萍乡衡水衡阳襄阳西宁西雅图诺沃克资阳邯郸郑州重庆银川长春长沙雅加达青岛鞍山马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1156) PDF downloads(117) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return