Volume 38 Issue 5
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MA Rong-chun, ZHAO Yi-bing. The Composition of Crime under the Vision of Genetics and Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 571-583. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060017
Citation: MA Rong-chun, ZHAO Yi-bing. The Composition of Crime under the Vision of Genetics and Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 571-583. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060017

The Composition of Crime under the Vision of Genetics and Structure

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060017
  • Received Date: 2022-06-07
    Available Online: 2022-10-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-25
  • Corresponding to the corresponding relationship between subject and object, the status of the constituent elements of the criminal subject should be affirmed, and its criminal constituent status can be described as follows: the criminal subject is the “logical starting point” of the four-element composition of crime, thus the “necessary” and “first” requirement. As the substantive content of the criminal subject, the capacity for criminal responsibility refers to the capacity to commit criminal acts and bear criminal responsibility. As a kind of “relatively evil capacity for freedom of will”, the capacity for criminal responsibility has the attribute of “relatively evil freedom of will”, and its essence is “criminal norm-violating capacity” or “criminal law-violating capacity”, which is “procedural ability” and “structural ability” from “criminal ability” to “criminal ability”. The ability of criminal responsibility is not only the “core” of “the core of the main elements of crime”, that is, the “logical starting point” of crime, but also the most basic “subjective premise” of the theory of punishment. In the four-element composition of crime, the necessity of the criminal object is the philosophical conclusion corresponding to the subject and the object, thus the natural conclusion of the “social relations law”, and the natural conclusion of the explanatory power of the criminal object. The classification and stratification of criminal objects are two different issues. Criminal objects can be classified at the level of similar objects and at the level of direct objects: the former occurs within “crimes of national legal interests”, “crimes of social legal interests” and “crimes of personal legal interests”; while the latter can use the number and carrier form and other standards. In particular, complex objects should be structurally grasped as “means object” and “purpose object” or “cause object” and “result object”. As for the so-called “random objects”, they are “pseudo objects” that need to be clarified. From “total object” to “similar object” and then to “direct object”, it is the content stratification of criminal objects; while from the criminal object at the national level to the criminal object at the social level and then to the criminal object at the individual level, it is the criminal object. The social structure is stratified. The stratification of the criminal object corresponds to the structure of the criminal object, thus reflecting the systematicness and completeness of the criminal law system.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    马克昌. 犯罪通论[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2013.
    [2]
    马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第二卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社出版, 2001.
    [3]
    陈兴良. 本体刑法学[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2001.
    [4]
    陈忠林. 刑法散得集(Ⅱ)[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2012.
    [5]
    陈忠林. 意大利刑法纲要[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1999.
    [6]
    陈忠林. 刑法散得集[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.
    [7]
    凯尔森. 法与国家的一般理论[M]. 沈宗灵, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1996.
    [8]
    黑格尔. 小逻辑[M]. 贺麟, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1980.
    [9]
    芝原邦尔, 堀内捷三. 刑法理论的现代的展开——总论I[M]. 东京: 日本评论社, 1988.
    [10]
    格尔德·克莱因海尔, 扬·施罗德. 九百年来德意志及欧洲法学家[M]. 许兰, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005.
    [11]
    乔治·恩德勒, 卡尔·霍曼, 马丁·昂纳克, 等. 经济伦理学大辞典[M]. 李兆雄, 等译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2001.
    [12]
    马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第2卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1957.
    [13]
    赵秉志. 犯罪主体论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1989.
    [14]
    刘艳红. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
    [15]
    藤木英雄, 板仓宏. 刑法的争点[M]. 东京: 有斐阁, 1987.
    [16]
    冯军. 刑事责任论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1996.
    [17]
    张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021.
    [18]
    肖中华. 犯罪构成及其关系论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2000.
    [19]
    陈兴良. 犯罪客体的去魅−一个学术史的考察[J]. 政治与法律,2009(12):90-102.
    [20]
    杨兴培. “犯罪客体”非法治成分批评[J]. 政法论坛,2009(5):119-126.
    [21]
    贾宇. 刑事违法性理论研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
    [22]
    冯亚东. 犯罪概念与犯罪客体之功能辨析:以司法客观过程为视角的分析[J]. 中外法学,2008(4):580-589.
    [23]
    张文. 犯罪构成初探[J]. 北京大学学报社科版,1984(5):46-54.
    [24]
    陈兴良. 犯罪构成的体系性思考[J]. 法制与社会发展,2000(3):46-66.
    [25]
    彭文华. 犯罪客体:曲解、质疑与理性解读−兼论正当事由的体系性定位[J]. 法律科学,2014(1):89-97.
    [26]
    李希慧,童伟华. “犯罪客体不要说” 之检讨−从比较法的视角考察[J]. 法商研究,2005(3):21-29.
    [27]
    欧锦雄. 为犯罪客体的构成要件地位辩护[J]. 法治研究,2014(5):16-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1455.2014.05.002
    [28]
    庄劲. 犯罪客体重合性罪数标准的倡导[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2006(2):23-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9017.2006.02.003
    [29]
    贾宇. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2019.
    [30]
    马荣春. 刑法典分则体系性的类型化强化[J]. 法治研究,2020(4):136-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1455.2020.04.013
    [31]
    马荣春,高坤龙. 中国犯罪论体系研究范式的变迁[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报,2021(3):55-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3275.2021.03.008
    [32]
    陈雄飞. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,20(3):43-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2004.03.009
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (346) PDF downloads(35) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return