QIAN Ning. Communal Care Service and the Improvement in Social Welfare[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 7-12.
Citation: LIU Zhao-ling, DUN Ning. The Application and Improvement of the Crime of Abusing the People in Custody or Tendance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 120-126. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060108

The Application and Improvement of the Crime of Abusing the People in Custody or Tendance-From the Perspective of Empirical Research

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060108
  • Received Date: 2022-06-21
    Available Online: 2023-01-04
  • Publish Date: 2023-01-05
  • The Criminal Law Amendment (9) added the crime of maltreating the ward and carer, which changed the first paragraph of the original crime of maltreatment, “only when told”. In addition, the subject of abuse has also been expanded, from those who have family relations to those who are responsible for guardianship and care of minors, the elderly, the sick, the disabled, etc. The crime has experienced seven years of judicial practice. Although it has played a certain role in strengthening the protection of minors, the elderly, the sick and the disabled, it has encountered problems in practice, such as incorrect understanding of the subject and the target of the crime, and difficult to grasp the “bad circumstances”. In view of the problems in judicial practice, relevant judicial interpretations should be issued to further clarify the subject or identification of the abuse of guardians and caregivers, clearly explain the target of the crime, and clearly define the “bad situation”, which can not only maintain the authority and stability of the law, but also effectively combat abuse crimes, and fully ensure the legitimate rights and interests of vulnerable groups.

     

  • [1]
    王思维. 论虐待被监护、看护人罪的适用[J]. 青少年犯罪问题,2018(3):56-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1509.2018.03.009
    [2]
    徐文文,赵秉志. 关于虐待罪立法完善问题的研讨−兼论虐童行为的犯罪化[J]. 法治研究,2013(3):103-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1455.2013.03.012
    [3]
    高铭暄,李彦峰. 虐待罪“吿诉才处理”除外规定的司法适用[J]. 法学,2016(11):145-150.
    [4]
    陈光中. 刑事诉讼法(第六版)[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
    [5]
    赵秉志,刘志伟,袁彬. 关于《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》新增及修改罪名的意见》[J]. 法学杂志,2015,36(10):1-10.
    [6]
    谢望原,张宝. 《刑法修正案(九)》的亮点与不足[J]. 苏州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,36(6):69-77.
    [7]
    陈忠林,席若. 单位犯罪的“嵌套责任论”[J]. 现代法学,2017,39(2):110-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2017.02.08
    [8]
    祝乃娟. 虐童事件凸显司法保护的重要性[N]. 21世纪经济报道, 2017-11-24(04).
    [9]
    李海洋. 依法惩处施暴者, 让“幼有所育”有保障[N]. 中国商报, 2017-11-16(05).
    [10]
    张占军. 论虐待被监护、看护人罪[J]. 河北法学,2016,34(9):78-85. doi: 10.16494/j.cnki.1002-3933.2016.09.008
    [11]
    刘子刚. 论虐待被监护、看护人罪的司法适用[J]. 克拉玛依学刊,2016,6(6):66-71. doi: 10.13677/j.cnki.cn65-1285/c.2016.06.13
    [12]
    贺洪波. 侵犯公民个人信息罪的精准解释[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,32(5):93-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8425(s).2018.05.011
    [13]
    谢望原. 虐待被监护、看护人罪的客观要素与司法认定[J]. 中国检察官,2017(3):76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6676.2017.03.034
    [14]
    魏康. “虐待被监护、看护人罪”司法认定的规范化研究[J]. 四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2016,31(6):74-84. doi: 10.11965/xbew20160608
    [15]
    屠文彦. 对〈刑法修正案(九)虐待罪修订的评析[J]. 中国新通信,2019,21(5):234-235.
    [16]
    姚建龙,林需需. 托儿机构虐童案司法疑难分析与对策建议−以虐待被看护人罪的司法适用为分析视角[J]. 中国青年社会科学,2018,37(2):31-35.
    [17]
    张瑾,綦鲁明. 积极应对人口老龄化,加快养老服务体系建设[J]. 人才资源开发,2018(9):17-18.
  • Relative Articles

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 58.4 %FULLTEXT: 58.4 %META: 35.9 %META: 35.9 %PDF: 5.7 %PDF: 5.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.3 %其他: 7.3 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %Nahant: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.5 %Rochester: 0.5 %Seattle: 2.4 %Seattle: 2.4 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %三亚: 0.2 %三亚: 0.2 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %东京: 1.1 %东京: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %信阳: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %北京: 3.8 %北京: 3.8 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南充: 0.2 %南充: 0.2 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉安: 0.2 %吉安: 0.2 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 0.4 %太原: 0.4 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.5 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 2.4 %张家口: 2.4 %惠州: 0.3 %惠州: 0.3 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 2.0 %扬州: 2.0 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新奥尔良: 1.1 %新奥尔良: 1.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.1 %杭州: 1.1 %松原: 0.1 %松原: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %江门: 0.2 %江门: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.6 %淄博: 0.6 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.9 %深圳: 0.9 %温州: 1.2 %温州: 1.2 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 4.1 %漯河: 4.1 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 3.0 %石家庄: 3.0 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 18.1 %芒廷维尤: 18.1 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %西宁: 26.2 %西宁: 26.2 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.9 %郑州: 3.2 %郑州: 3.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %黑河: 0.1 %黑河: 0.1 %其他其他NahantRochesterSeattleUnited States三亚上海东京东莞临沂保定信阳六安兰州内江北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌南通南阳台州合肥吉安周口呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴大连天津太原宁波宣城常州常德平顶山广州张家口惠州成都扬州新加坡新奥尔良昆明晋城朝阳杭州松原格兰特县武汉江门沈阳沧州泉州济南海东海口淄博淮南深圳温州湖州湛江漯河珠海盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠衡水衡阳西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳邯郸郑州重庆金华镇江长春长沙阳泉青岛鞍山马鞍山驻马店黑河

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (442) PDF downloads(70) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return