Research on the Interpretation of Criminal Law under the Dichotomy of Cybercrime

ZHANG Xin-wen

Volume 37 Issue 6

Dec. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2021 > 37(6): 679-688

ZHANG Xin-wen. Research on the Interpretation of Criminal Law under the Dichotomy of Cybercrime[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 679-688.

Citation:

ZHANG Xin-wen. Research on the Interpretation of Criminal Law under the Dichotomy of Cybercrime[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 679-688.

Citation:

PDF( 898 KB)

Research on the Interpretation of Criminal Law under the Dichotomy of Cybercrime

ZHANG Xin-wen

Law School of Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received Date: 2021-09-09
Available Online: 2021-11-17
Publish Date: 2021-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

According to the different texts of criminal law, cybercrime can be divided into networked traditional crime and specialized cybercrime. This dichotomy of cybercrime shows various differences in the interpretation of criminal law. Traditional cybercrime is more inclined to the theory of infringement of legal interests, substantive interpretation, objective interpretation and expansion interpretation, while special cybercrime is more inclined to the theory of normative violation, formal interpretation, subjective interpretation and limited interpretation. In the misunderstanding of interpretation, the traditional network crime is very easy to overhead the constituent elements. Therefore, it is necessary to use the method of formal interpretation to explain the crime, while the special network crime is easy to ignore the degree of infringement of legal interests. Therefore, it is necessary to explain the crime using substantive interpretation. When interpreting the criminal law of these two types of cybercrimes, we should guard against the misunderstanding of the omnipotent theory of criminal law and take a variety of means to control the harmful behavior of the network.
- cybercrime,
- interpretation of criminal law,
- substantial interpretation,
- formal interpretation,
- infringement of legal interest.

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	于志刚. 网络思维的演变与网络犯罪的制裁思路[J]. 中外法学,2014,26(4):1045-1058.
[2]	陈兴良. 网络犯罪的刑法应对[J]. 中国法律评论,2020(1):88-95.
[3]	欧阳本祺. 论网络时代刑法解释的限度[J]. 中国法学,2017(3):164-183.
[4]	刘艳红. 网络犯罪的刑法解释空间向度研究[J]. 中国法学,2019(6):202-223.
[5]	张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016.
[6]	梁根林. 传统犯罪网络化: 归责障碍、刑法应对与教义限缩[J]. 法学,2017(2):3-13.
[7]	梁根林. 刑法总论问题论要[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.
[8]	陈兴良. 形式解释论的再宣示[J]. 中国法学,2010(4):27-48.
[9]	刘艳红. 网络时代刑法客观解释新塑造: “主观的客观解释论”[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(3):93-105.
[10]	乌尔里希·齐白,王华伟、吴舟,译. 比较法视野下网络服务提供者的责任[J]. 刑事法评论,2015,37(2):191-222.
[11]	陈洪兵. 论拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的适用空间[J]. 政治与法律,2017(12):35-43.
[12]	前田雅英. 刑法总论讲义[M]. 曾文科, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017.
[13]	欧阳本祺,王倩. 《刑法修正案(九)》新增网络犯罪的法律适用[J]. 江苏行政学院学报,2016(4):124-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2016.04.016
[14]	付玉明. 论刑法中的中立帮助行为[J]. 法学杂志,2017,38(10):63-72.
[15]	储陈城,胡子昕. 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的因果性及出罪路径−以客观归责为中心的讨论[J]. 山东法官培训学院学报,2020,36(1):90-102.
[16]	苏永生. 法益保护理论中国化之反思与重构[J]. 政法论坛,2019,37(1):60-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2019.01.006
[17]	叶良芳. 刷单炒信行为的规范分析及其治理路径[J]. 法学,2018(3):177-191.
[18]	储陈城. 限制网络平台帮助行为处罚的理论解构−以日本Winny案为视角的分析[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2017(6):49-67.
[19]	刘艳红. 无罪的快播与有罪的思维−“快播案”有罪论之反思与批判[J]. 政治与法律,2016(12):104-112.
[20]	周光权. 刑法学的向度[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004.
[21]	劳东燕. 网络时代刑法体系的功能化走向[J]. 中国法律评论,2020(2):101-114.

Relative Articles

[1]	JU Zhiqin, GAO Xiuxue. The Information Prominence of Chinese Experiential Aspect Marker guo and Its Explanatory Power to the Grammatical Meaning of guo[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 71-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100032
[2]	ZHU Zufei, KANG Ming. Interpreting the Independence of Real Right Act in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 486-500. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100050
[3]	CHEN Li-wen. Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 346-352. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026
[4]	ZHAO Wei-zhong, WEI Yue-ning. On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 706-713. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017
[5]	YUAN Jia-yin. Infringement Iinterests of Biosecurity Crime and Regulatory Path[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 714-723. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050027
[6]	ZHAO Li-li, ZHANG Xue. Research on the Ownership of Data Competitive Rights of Network Operators[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 660-669.
[7]	LIAO Li-huan. The Normative Structure of Preventive Environmental Public Interest Litigation: Taking Article 1 of “The Interpretation of Several Issues on the Application of Law to Civil Public Interest Litigation Cases” as the Center[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 66-73.
[8]	HUANG Mei-jiao, LI Zhong-bing. The Impact of Internet Embedding and Social Initiative on the Social Network of Returning Entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 57-64.
[9]	ZHANG Na. Internet and Gender: Qualitative Research Based on Practical Significance of Urban Youth's Sex Talk Online[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(2): 44-54.
[10]	WANG Xia. Language, Story, and Explanation: Hayden White's Theory of Historical Narration[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 72-76.
[11]	QIAN Zhen-hua. Clique Analysis and Visualization of Co-author Network in the Field of Philosophy of Science and Technology in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 78-85.
[12]	LIU Zhong-yi. Mirror Revelry: Studies on Internet Sex[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 119-124,128.
[13]	XING Jiang, WANG Yang. Research on Legislation of the Crime of Bankruptcy Fraud[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 54-60.
[14]	SHEN Min-rong. Analysis on the Thoughts of Natural Person: Sources and Meaning[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 66-73,84.
[15]	HOU Deng-hua. The Change of Arbitration Agreement Form as a Reflection of the Change of Arbitration System Comprehension[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 73-79,89.
[16]	WANG Mei-chun. An Interpretation of Conciliation of Court from a Cultural Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(4): 74-78.
[17]	LU Ning. The Invention of Internet-economy and Material Base[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2000, 16(4): 19-23.