ZENG Lei, ZHU Xin-yu, YE Lan. A Study of Projection in Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in BA Dissertation — Taking the Chapter of Literature Review as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 162-171. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021050082
Citation: ZENG Lei, ZHU Xin-yu, YE Lan. A Study of Projection in Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in BA Dissertation — Taking the Chapter of Literature Review as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 162-171. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021050082

A Study of Projection in Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in BA Dissertation — Taking the Chapter of Literature Review as an Example

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021050082
  • Received Date: 2021-05-29
    Available Online: 2022-04-06
  • Publish Date: 2022-04-25
  • Previous studies on dissertations are mainly done on the Master’s level or the Ph.D. level, and not much research has been focused on the BA dissertations, not to mention the examination of ideational grammatical metaphor in BA dissertations. Hence, guided by the theory of grammatical metaphor in Systemic Functional Grammar, this study is carried out to look into projection used by English majors in the literature review of their BA dissertations. A questionnaire is designed to investigate students’ preference in using projection language in the literature review. It shows that students have an inclination to use projection structures that are not grammatically metaphorical instead of projection structures that are grammatically metaphorical. Results of the questionnaire show that students have the awareness to diversify the use of projections structures in the literature review, but from the analysis of their actual writing, we find that their use of projection structures is monotonous. Moreover, they tend to use the projection structure which begins with the authors’ surnames, and most of the projection verbs used by them are the ones in verbal processes and mental processes. This way of projection use diverges from that of the undergraduates who are native English speakers. Based on these findings, the main problems in students’ use of projection especially the use of ideational grammatical metaphors, are discussed and related suggestions are put forward.

     

  • [1]
    HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold, 1994.
    [2]
    曾蕾, 梁红艳. 英汉投射语言对比研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2019.
    [3]
    SWALES J M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
    [4]
    THOMPSON G. Repotting [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 2000.
    [5]
    THOMPSON G & YE Y. Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1991, 12(4):365-382. doi: 10.1093/applin/12.4.365
    [6]
    李战子. 学术话语中认知型情态的多重人际意义[J]. 外语教学与研究,2001(5):353-358,399-400. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0429.2001.05.006
    [7]
    黄小苹. 学术论文中模糊限制语的语篇语用分析[J]. 四川外语学院学报,2002(4):85-88.
    [8]
    唐丽萍. 学术书评语类结构的评价分析[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2004(3):35-43.
    [9]
    唐青叶. 学术语篇中的转述现象[J]. 外语与外语教学,2004(2):3-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2004.02.002
    [10]
    杨阳. 英汉科技论文中介入资源运用的对比研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(6):34-41.
    [11]
    姜峰. 基于多维分析的学术语篇语体特征的历时考察[J]. 外语教学与研究,2020,52(5):663-673,798.
    [12]
    张云仙,吴学东,姜禾娇. 关于博士学位论文质量的几点思考[J]. 北京科技大学学报 (社会科学版),2005(S1):45-48.
    [13]
    何晔. 文献综述结构图式−以学位论文为例[J]. 中国外语,2015,12(1):82-89.
    [14]
    陈朗,董路. 翻译专业硕士文献综述类论文路径新索[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,53(4):137-144.
    [15]
    KWAN B S C. The schematic structure of literature re-views in doctoral theses of applied linguistics[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2006, 25(1):30-55. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
    [16]
    陈明芳. 博士论文文献综述语篇建构的互动视角[J]. 四川外语学院学报,2008,24(6):45-50.
    [17]
    雷蕾. 中国英语学习者学术写作句法复杂度研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报,2017,40(5):1-10,159.
    [18]
    周惠,刘永兵. 二语学术写作中语义概括性的发展特征研究[J]. 外语界,2019(3):32-40.
    [19]
    陈浩,文秋芳. 基于“产出导向法”的学术英语写作名词化教学研究−以促成教学环节为例[J]. 外语教育研究前沿,2020,3(1):15-23,86-87.
    [20]
    娄宝翠,邱梦瑶. 学习者英语学术写作报道据素使用特征研究[J]. 外语研究,2020,37(6):67-73.
    [21]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold, 2004.
    [22]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
    [23]
    MARTIN J R. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1992.
    [24]
    THOMPSON G. Introducing Functional Grammar[M]. London: Arnold, 1996.
    [25]
    胡壮麟. 认知隐喻学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004.
    [26]
    武姜生. 大学生英语学术写作中引述句的主语特征[J]. 中国外语,2010,7(2):27-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9382.2010.02.006
    [27]
    毛明勇,桑红艳. 人际意义视阈下新媒体语篇图文关系探究−以微信公众号China Daily文章为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):147-153.
    [28]
    HYLAND K & TSE P. Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2005, 24(2):123-139. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
    [29]
    HYLAND K. Genre and academic writing in the disciplines[J]. Language Teaching, 2008, 41(4):543-562. doi: 10.1017/S0261444808005235
    [30]
    HYLAND K. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002, 34(8):1091-1112. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
    [31]
    CHARLES M. The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of thesis[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2006, 27(3):492-518. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml021
    [32]
    熊学亮,刘东虹. 英语学习中语法隐喻的迁移[J]. 外语教学与研究,2005(2):100-105,160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0429.2005.02.003
    [33]
    赵晶,何中清. 跨语认知映射视角下新时代中国特色政治隐喻的英译研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(5):518-525.
    [34]
    张贤,王勇. 企业公开致歉信的语类结构及语义特征[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(2):19-28.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Shukun. Embedded Projection Research: Paths and Prospects[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 83-91. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023080039
    [2]REN Ran, GAO Ge. Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 94-103. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010030
    [3]WU Suwei, GUO Ying. Gestural Representation of Vertical Metaphor of Moral Concept in Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 574-582. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080042
    [4]ZENG Lei, ZHU Xinyu. The Study of Resemiotisation System of Projection: Taking Bilingual Picture Book of Children’s Literature as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 554-562. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100006
    [5]LIU Wen-bo. Identity of Floating Population: Literature Review and Research Prospect[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 299-306.
    [6]ZHAO Jing, HE Zhong-qing. Translation of Political Metaphors with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era in the Perspective of Cross-lingual Cognitive Mapping[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(5): 518-525.
    [7]ZENG Lei, ZHU Xin-yu. The Realization of Ideational Meaning of Multimodal Projection in Sinology Comics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 1-9.
    [8]SUN Ya, REN Hui, CUI Zi-xuan. Register Analysis Based on Conceptual Mapping Model-A Case Study of WAR Metaphor Use[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 1-7.
    [9]SUN Yi, ZHOU Jing. Interpretation of National Flag Multimodal Metaphor across the World[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 1-7.
    [10]ZENG Lei, YANG Mu-wen. The Distinctness and Similarity of Projection in Visual Grammarand Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 1-4,11.
    [11]XIA Li. A Review of Chinese-English Translation of Scientific Paper Abstracts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 113-118.
    [12]MIAO Xing-wei, LIU Li-hua. A Cognitive Semantic Study of Transitive Phrasal Verbs with Up[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 20-25.
    [13]WANG Gen-lian. An Interpretation of the Syntactics and Semantics of “Fact” Projection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 10-16.
    [14]ZHANG Rui. A Comparison between Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese and English Sayings of Life[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 42-50.
    [15]ZHANG Jing-yuan, LIU Xiao. Grammatical Metaphor and Pragmatic Presupposition[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 17-21.
    [16]HOU Jian-bo, SUN Jing-yi. Conceptual Metaphor and Ideology: Based on the Study of H1N1 Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 33-38.
    [17]CHEN Ming-fang. Criticism in Academic Discourse Literature Review across the Disciplines[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 17-22.
    [18]QI Xi. On English Causative Constructions and “Projection”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 106-111.
    [19]CENG Lei. An Approach to the Metaphorical Meanings of the Tense of Projecting Verbs in English Academic Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 104-108.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 何伟,仲伟. 系统功能语言学视角下的小句配列关系再思考. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(04): 431-437 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.3 %FULLTEXT: 28.3 %META: 51.3 %META: 51.3 %PDF: 20.3 %PDF: 20.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.6 %其他: 8.6 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Seattle: 13.8 %Seattle: 13.8 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 1.3 %上海: 1.3 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %北京: 2.0 %北京: 2.0 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣保罗: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大庆: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 2.8 %广州: 2.8 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %延边: 0.1 %延边: 0.1 %弗拉格斯塔夫: 0.1 %弗拉格斯塔夫: 0.1 %张家口: 0.5 %张家口: 0.5 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %新奥尔良: 1.0 %新奥尔良: 1.0 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %景德镇: 0.1 %景德镇: 0.1 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 4.0 %漯河: 4.0 %珠海: 1.5 %珠海: 1.5 %甘南: 0.1 %甘南: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 14.2 %芒廷维尤: 14.2 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 30.1 %西宁: 30.1 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长沙: 1.3 %长沙: 1.3 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他其他Canyon CountryChinaHanoiSeattleUnited States[]上海东京东莞中山丹东佛山克拉玛依兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌厦门台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴圣保罗大同大庆天津宣城常州平顶山广州廊坊延边弗拉格斯塔夫张家口成都扬州新奥尔良日照昆明景德镇杭州森尼韦尔武汉洛阳济南淄博淮安深圳温州湖州湛江漯河珠海甘南石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥菏泽衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳邯郸郑州镇江长沙青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (685) PDF downloads(264) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return