LI Wen-hua, LV Shuai. Legislative Conception of Conditional Non-Prosecution Applicable to Corporate Compliance Cases[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 335-345. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030089
Citation: LI Wen-hua, LV Shuai. Legislative Conception of Conditional Non-Prosecution Applicable to Corporate Compliance Cases[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 335-345. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030089

Legislative Conception of Conditional Non-Prosecution Applicable to Corporate Compliance Cases

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022030089
  • Received Date: 2022-03-23
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-23
  • The decision not to prosecute the company involved is in line with the value system of plead guilty and lenient punishment, and it also promotes the development of the company to a certain extent. The leniency system for admitting guilt and accepting punishment provides institutional space for the application of conditional non-prosecution to corporate compliance cases, and at the same time, conditional non-prosecution also provides companies with better institutional protection as a decriminalization method. In practice, conditional non-prosecution has been generally applied to corporate compliance cases, but there are still many problems such as unclear application conditions, different nature and content of conditions, and unclear period of deferred prosecution. Therefore, the next thing to do is to Combined with the experience of judicial practice in various places, discuss the specific design of the system into law, from the applicable charges, subjects, types and other conditions of the case, combined with the nature and content of the conditions, the necessity of social investigation, the determination of the suspension of prosecution period and compliance make a preliminary legislative conception from specific aspects such as inspections.

     

  • [1]
    陈瑞华. 企业合规基本理论(第二版)[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021.
    [2]
    杨帆. 企业合规中附条件不起诉立法研究[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2020(3):77-88.
    [3]
    李勇. 检察视角下中国刑事合规之构建[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2020,28(4):99-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9428.2020.04.007
    [4]
    时延安. 合规计划实施与单位的刑事归责[J]. 法学杂志,2019,40(9):20-33.
    [5]
    欧阳本祺. 我国建立企业犯罪附条件不起诉制度的探讨[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2020(3):63-76.
    [6]
    时延安. 单位刑事案件的附条件不起诉与企业治理理论探讨[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2020(3):51-62.
    [7]
    李勇. 企业附条件不起诉的立法建议[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(2):127-143.
    [8]
    杨宇冠. 企业合规与刑事诉讼法修改[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2021(6):144-162.
    [9]
    陈瑞华. 刑事诉讼的合规激励模式[J]. 中国法学,2020(6):225-244.
    [10]
    肖沛权. 企业合规不起诉制度的实践流变、价值及其构建[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,44(5):153-160.
    [11]
    陈卫东. 认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J]. 中国法学,2016(2):48-64.
    [12]
    左卫民. 认罪认罚何以从宽: 误区与正解−反思效率优先的改革主张[J]. 法学研究,2017,39(3):160-175.
    [13]
    张军. 最高人民检察院工作报告[EB/OL]. (2020-06-02)[2022-02-11].http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202006/36d4ddf6ffb54c2e9948c556009c9732.shtml.
    [14]
    陈卫东. 认罪认罚从宽制度试点中的几个问题[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2017,25(1):3-8, 171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9428.2017.01.001
    [15]
    魏晓娜. 完善认罪认罚从宽制度: 中国语境下的关键词展开[J]. 法学研究,2016,38(4):79-98.
    [16]
    周光权. 论刑法与认罪认罚从宽制度的衔接[J]. 清华法学,2019,13(3):28-41.
    [17]
    王瑞君,陈禹衡. 完善与救济: 对认罪认罚从宽量刑建议司法适用的反思[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(3):78-88.
    [18]
    阿不都米吉提·吾买尔. 附条件不起诉中的“附加条件”[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2017,25(3):50-60, 172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9428.2017.03.003
    [19]
    林钰雄. 刑事诉讼法(下)[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2002.
    [20]
    切萨雷·贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
    [21]
    黎宏. 单位刑事责任论[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001.
    [22]
    黎宏. 合规计划与企业刑事责任[J]. 法学杂志,2019,40(9):9-19.
    [23]
    黎宏. 组织体刑事责任论及其应用[J]. 法学研究,2020,42(2):71-88.
    [24]
    侯登华,赵莹雪. 相对不起诉制度的监督制约机制研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):160-166.
    [25]
    最高人民检察院. 涉案企业合规整改不是“走过场”[EB/OL]. (2022-01-03)[2022-02-14].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/D1bM3D4ZHaz9Gec817AA_g.
    [26]
    何挺. 附条件不起诉扩大适用于成年人案件的新思考[J]. 中国刑事法杂志,2019(4):46-59.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZOU Kailiang, WANG Xindi. Compliance and Construction of Platform Enterprise Data from the Perspective of Sensitive Personal Information Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 87-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023040070
    [2]CHEN Yu, XU Fangdi. Analysis of Criminal Law Doctrine Analysis on the Realization of Incentive Function of Enterprise Corporate[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 798-807. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100076
    [3]CHEN Li-wen. Reflection and Outlet of the Debate on the View of Criminal Law Legislation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 346-352. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120026
    [4]LI Yu-hua, LI Hua-chen. Initiation Conditions of the Compliance Non-prosecution Inspection Process[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 563-570. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040006
    [5]ZHU Yuan, XIAO Jia-xin. Research on the Application of Corporate Compliance System under the Framework of Social Enterprises[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 94-102. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021090016
    [6]WU Rui-jia. Research on the Normative Application of Legislative Quantitative Evaluation Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 290-298.
    [7]CAO Hai-jing, WU Han-dong. Local Cooperative Legislation from the Perspective of Regional Development Right[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 56-65.
    [8]WANG Qin. Exploring the Multimodal Semiotic Design of EFL Digital Textbook:A Case Study on “English for the Humanities”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 154-159.
    [9]XING Bin-wen. How Legislators Deal with Scientific & Technological Issues[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 670-678.
    [10]HOU Deng-hua, ZHAO Ying-xue. Study on the Discretionary Non-prosecution and the Perfection of Its Supervision and Restriction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 160-166.
    [11]CHI Da-kui. The Trial Avoidance Effect of Guilty Plea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 84-90,97.
    [12]WANG Rui-jun, CHEN Yu-heng. Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 78-88.
    [13]FU Qiang. A Brief Analysis on the Improvement of the Legislation of the People’s Livelihood of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 81-88,101.
    [14]FENG Ying, ZHANG Ming-lei. Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 52-59,67.
    [15]ZHANG Ceng-lian, WU Xiao-juan. Tax Planning Research for Non-resident Enterprises: Theoretical Analysis and Case Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(4): 116-123.
    [16]TIAN Ye. Legal Reflections on “Designed Babies”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 57-61.
    [17]XING Jiang, WANG Yang. Research on Legislation of the Crime of Bankruptcy Fraud[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 54-60.
    [18]KU Shao-xiong. Social Work Evaluation——Single Sample Design[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 6-9.
    [19]ZHANG Xiao-ming. Operational System Design of Crisis Management of Public Sector from SARS Event[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 19-23,35.
    [20]HUANG Hui. Research on the system of Estate Register in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(3): 67-72.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 刘品新. 论合规缓诉. 政法论坛. 2024(01): 91-101 .
    2. 自正法. 企业合规附条件不起诉的适用范围:试点经验与法理反思. 法学论坛. 2024(01): 148-160 .
    3. 桑先军. 涉案企业合规第三方监督评估机制的适用与完善. 中国法律评论. 2024(03): 213-226 .
    4. 叶萍,武东方. 危害生产安全犯罪适用企业合规的困境解决与实践设计. 上海公安学院学报. 2024(03): 44-57 .
    5. 王云帅. 理据、偏差与匡正:少捕慎诉慎押政策背景下的有效辩护. 中国刑事辩护. 2024(00): 30-46 .
    6. 高景峰. 涉案企业合规改革的立法完善与监督评估实践创新. 政法论坛. 2023(01): 117-131 .
    7. 李君阳,张志英. 涉案企业合规不起诉改革的程序问题研究. 梧州学院学报. 2023(03): 9-16 .
    8. 孙国祥. 企业合规不起诉法院司法审查的理据、模式和路径. 法学论坛. 2023(05): 38-49 .
    9. 陈宇,徐方迪. 企业刑事合规激励功能实现的刑法教义学解析. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(06): 798-807 .
    10. 吕帅,李文华. 行刑衔接机制下企业合规研究. 江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(03): 68-75 .
    11. 孙国祥. 当前企业合规改革中几个重要问题. 中国应用法学. 2023(05): 107-115 .
    12. 李本灿. 实体与程序互动视野下的刑事合规立法. 中国法学. 2023(05): 69-89 .

    Other cited types(16)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 27.7 %FULLTEXT: 27.7 %META: 65.8 %META: 65.8 %PDF: 6.6 %PDF: 6.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.8 %其他: 5.8 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %Macau: 0.1 %Macau: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Seattle: 2.3 %Seattle: 2.3 %上海: 4.2 %上海: 4.2 %上饶: 0.3 %上饶: 0.3 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 1.8 %北京: 1.8 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %同奈: 1.4 %同奈: 1.4 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %开封: 0.2 %开封: 0.2 %张家口: 1.5 %张家口: 1.5 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %新奥尔良: 1.3 %新奥尔良: 1.3 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %梅州: 0.1 %梅州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %河内: 2.3 %河内: 2.3 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海东: 0.2 %海东: 0.2 %淄博: 0.5 %淄博: 0.5 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %牡丹江: 0.4 %牡丹江: 0.4 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %绍兴: 1.5 %绍兴: 1.5 %芒廷维尤: 25.8 %芒廷维尤: 25.8 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %西宁: 33.7 %西宁: 33.7 %贵港: 0.5 %贵港: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他ChinaMacauRochesterSeattle上海上饶东莞临汾信阳兰州北京十堰华盛顿州南京南昌同奈唐山嘉兴大连天津宁波宣城常州平顶山广州开封张家口扬州新奥尔良昆明晋中晋城杭州梅州武汉河内济源海东淄博温州渭南漯河漳州潍坊牡丹江珠海盐城石家庄福州绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州菏泽衡阳西宁贵港贵阳遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (716) PDF downloads(71) Cited by(28)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return