The Conceptual Difference of the Dialogues between China and the UK on the Eve of the Opium War

LI Guan-jie

Volume 28 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2012 > 28(3): 174-178

LI Guan-jie. The Conceptual Difference of the Dialogues between China and the UK on the Eve of the Opium War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 174-178.

Citation:

LI Guan-jie. The Conceptual Difference of the Dialogues between China and the UK on the Eve of the Opium War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 174-178.

Citation:

PDF( 214 KB)

The Conceptual Difference of the Dialogues between China and the UK on the Eve of the Opium War

LI Guan-jie

Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, Shanghai 200233, China

Received Date: 2012-05-06
Available Online: 2021-06-24

Abstract

Abstract

On the eve of the Opium War, the negotiations addressing the common problems between China and the UK were not unblocked.They had different institutions, cultures and concepts, and their dialogues were monologic.Chinese Tribute System reflected the concepts of superiority and inferiority in the foreign relations, while Britain within Vienna System had the principle of equality.China was a dynastic country, while Britain was a democratic state.China was ruled by man while Britain ruled by law.China preferred to collectivism, and Britain liked individualism and liberalism better.They could not be clearly known each other.In this context, the dialogues were failed.Then the final solution must be the use of military power.
- Sino-the UK relations,
- the Opium War,
- dialogues

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	XIAO Fu-ping. Locke's Abstract Ideas: Name and Meaning[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 98-106.
[2]	WU Nan, ZHANG Jing-yuan. Exploration of Gender Differences in Speech Manner from the Perspective of Interpersonal Metafunction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 18-24.
[3]	CHEN Xun-wu. The Basic Concept of Cosmopolitanism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 52-60.
[4]	WU Fan, LIN Chuan. Gender Differences of Occupational Stress and an Intervention Model from Social Work Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 113-121.
[5]	XIA Xue. Exploring the Application of Occupational Social Work in Gender Different Staff Relations of the ‘80 hou’[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 84-88,135.
[6]	FENG Hu, ZHANG Xuan. Regional Differences in Internet Development in China and Policy Management[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 150-157.
[7]	ZHOU Dan. Interpretation of Kang Youwei's Revolutionary Concept[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 76-80,96.
[8]	LI Chun. Research on Standard Distinction Between Civil and Commercial Law and Diversity of Liability Mechanism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 61-69.
[9]	SHI Geng-shan, ZHANG Shang-lian. A Study of Gender Differences in Compliments——from the Perspective of a Village Speech Community[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 104-108.
[10]	SUN Qiong-ru, YE Wen-zhen. The Marriage Concept of Migrant Women and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 23-30.
[11]	QU Guo-zhong, SHAO Jian-hong. The Empirical Study on the Relationship between Consumption Concept and Consumption Behavior[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 29-32,44.
[12]	JIN Ling. Christian Culture in the Middle Ages and the Formation of the “Idea of Europe”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 132-135,142.
[13]	HUANG Zhen-yun, PAN Zhen-xin. Mythological Thinking of “Biography of Many Supernatural Beings” and Novelists' Conceptions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 96-105.
[15]	MA Zi-li. History and Novel A Brief Review of the Development of Novel Concept[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 99-101.
[16]	HE Xiong-lang. The Development of Regional Economic Discrepancy Theory and Its Inspirations[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 23-28.
[17]	ZHANG Bei-gen. The Negotiation about the Questions of the Silver and Currency Reform Between China and America[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 6-10.
[18]	ZUO Yu-he. From “Pratical Academia” To “the Subject of Classif ication and Foundation”——The Academic Classification Sense and Academic Classification Plan in Modern Chinese History[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(1): 30-34.
[19]	SUN Li-yuan. Cultural Differences And Pragmatic Translation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(4): 65-69.