Research on Standard Distinction Between Civil and Commercial Law and Diversity of Liability Mechanism

LI Chun

Volume 26 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2010 > 26(3): 61-69

LI Chun. Research on Standard Distinction Between Civil and Commercial Law and Diversity of Liability Mechanism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 61-69.

Citation:

LI Chun. Research on Standard Distinction Between Civil and Commercial Law and Diversity of Liability Mechanism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 61-69.

Citation:

PDF( 349 KB)

Research on Standard Distinction Between Civil and Commercial Law and Diversity of Liability Mechanism

LI Chun

School of Law Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Received Date: 2010-08-06
Available Online: 2021-06-26

Abstract

Abstract

Standard, a topic of dispute of issue and doctrine, relates to the program, the guiding ideology and basic concepts of law, and also the liability mechanism, and it has great influence on legislation and justice.It seems relatively clear concerning what is the standard of civil or commercial law, but actually it is not uniform, and there is still room for study.Based on the standpoint of separation of civil and commercial code, the thesis abandons the polarization selection dilemma between personal and social standard, then suggests and demonstrates that civil law persists in personal standard while commercial law upholds enterprise one.Formation and regulation mechanism of civil and commercial liability are also studied comparatively in the paper.
- civil law standard,
- commercial law standard,
- distinction of standards,
- liability mechanism

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHU Zufei, KANG Ming. Interpreting the Independence of Real Right Act in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 486-500. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100050
[2]	YU Wen-qing. The Constitutional Meanings of the Right of Habitation Norms in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 103-110. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021110011
[3]	LI Geng-kun. Analyzing the Legal System of Corporate Social Responsibility with the Article 19 of the Company Law (Revised Draft)[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 449-458. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120060
[4]	TIAN Yuan. The Proletarian Literary from 1927 to 1929 and the Theory Construction of the People-oriented Standpoint[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(4): 405-412.
[5]	SONG Yang. Research on the Perfection of New Energy Vehicle Carbon Credit System from the Perspective of Civil Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 62-68.
[6]	KE Yong-min. Legislation Arrangement of External Effects of Resolutions: Comment on Provisos of Article 85 and 94 in the General Part of Chinese Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(3): 98-104.
[7]	ZHANG Chun-yan. Mood as the Key Criterion for Parataxis and Parataxis in Clause Complexes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 37-43.
[8]	WANG Lei. Struggle for Right: Spiritual Education for Civil Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 88-92,133.
[9]	DU Xiao-zhi, HE Cheng. Legislative Mode Selection of Tort Law in Civil Code System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 80-83,107.
[10]	LI Yong. Reflection on the Individual-centered Humanitarianism Literature[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 9-12.
[11]	XIAO Jian-hua, ZHOU Wei. On Theoretical System of Distribution of Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 46-51.
[12]	XIAO Jian-guo, XIE Jun. Research on the Distribution of Burden of Proof to Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 55-61.
[13]	LI Xiao-guang. The Ethical Responsibility of Scientists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 151-156.
[14]	ZHANG Jun-yan. Liabilities for Breach of Contract and the Limits of Compensation for Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 59-62,72.
[15]	XIAO Jian-hua, WANG De-xin. The Methodological of Meaning of Burden of Proof Judgement in Civil Law System: A Concurrent Analysis of Its Misuse by Chinese Scholars[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 44-51.
[16]	ZHANG Lu. Contractual Obligations in Securities Transactions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 21-24.
[17]	WANG Wei. On D & O Liability InSurance in Common Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 21-26.