Citation: | QIAO Fang-e, WANG Facai. The “Trial Restraint Effect” of Civil Self-Admission from the Perspective of Argumentalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(6): 789-797. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022070071 |
[1] |
张锦. 新证据规则下法官查明事实职权活动研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,53(2):147-156. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5110.2021.02.015
|
[2] |
段文波. 我国民事自认的非约束性及其修正[J]. 法学研究,2020,42(1):100-116.
|
[3] |
张卫平. 民事证据法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017.
|
[4] |
霍海红. 诉讼时效中断证明责任的中国表达[J]. 中外法学,2021,33(2):369-385.
|
[5] |
常怡. 比较民事诉讼法[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
|
[6] |
沈德咏主编. 最高人民法院民事诉讼法司法解释理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2015.
|
[7] |
廖浩. 自认证据化:表征、法理辨证与矫正路径[J]. 南大法学,2021(2):58-75.
|
[8] |
张卫平. 民事证据法:建构中的制度移植[J]. 政法论坛,2001(4):87-96.
|
[9] |
王亚新, 陈杭平, 刘君博. 中国民事诉讼法重点讲义[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017.
|
[10] |
奚晓明, 杜万华主编. 最高人民法院民事诉讼法司法解释适用解答[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2015.
|
[11] |
李浩. 新《民事诉讼证据规定》的主要问题[J]. 证据科学,2020,28(3):302-314.
|
[12] |
陈锦红. 论民事诉讼自认规则的完善[J]. 华东政法学院学报,2004(6):45-50.
|
[13] |
张卫平. 事实探知:绝对化倾向及其消解−对一种民事审判理念的自省[J]. 法学研究,2001(4):70-79.
|
[14] |
宋朝武. 论民事诉讼中的自认[J]. 中国法学,2003(2):113-123.
|
[15] |
沈维琼. 诉讼中的调解与当事人自认−对《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第67条的法律思考及价值评价[J]. 法律适用,2003(5):30-32.
|
[16] |
张卫平. 自由心证原则的再认识:制约与保障−以民事诉讼的事实认定为中心[J]. 政法论丛,2017(4):14-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6274.2017.04.002
|
[17] |
任品杰. 论二元制模式下民刑虚假诉讼程序衔接[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报,2021(2):146-156.
|
[18] |
傅向宇. 虚假自认效力的辩论主义回归[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2018,26(1):140-149,175-176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9428.2018.01.010
|
[19] |
占善刚,徐莹. 自认的审判排除效−《民诉法解释》第92条第3款之初步探讨[J]. 证据科学,2017,25(6):674-683.
|
[20] |
贺卫方. 中国古代司法判决的风格与精神−以宋代判决为基本依据兼与英国比较[J]. 中国社会科学,1990(6):203-219.
|
[21] |
邱星美,张红娇. 论民事诉讼自认制度之限制性规则[J]. 法律适用,2013(3):57-61.
|
[22] |
曹忠,刘耀国. 论自认规则在民事诉讼中的适用[J]. 政治与法律,2004(3):139-142.
|
[23] |
吴杰. 论民事诉讼自认的辨识[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报,2009(2):126-128.
|
[24] |
最高人民法院民事审判第一庭编著. 最高人民法院新民事诉讼证据规定理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2020.
|
[25] |
李喜莲,肖文. 无争议事实记载机制的实践乱象与规范对策[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版),2019,25(2):50-58.
|
[26] |
高桥宏志. 民事诉讼法制度与理论的深层分析[M]. 林剑锋译, 北京: 法律出版社, 2004.
|
[27] |
冉博. 《民事证据新规》视野下自认制度审判排除效的再探讨[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):177-185.
|
[28] |
霍海红. 论“重大误解且与事实不符”的自认撤销组合事由−从《民事证据规定(2019)》第9条再出发[J]. 现代法学,2021,43(1):61-73.
|
[1] | RAN Bo. From the Perspective of “Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation” Re-discussion on the Effect of Preclusion of the Self-admission System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 177-185. |
[2] | CHI Da-kui. The Trial Avoidance Effect of Guilty Plea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 84-90,97. |
[3] | WANG Fu-fang. Embodied Realism: Theoretical Controversies and Challenges[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 20-25. |
[4] | WANG Xia. Holocaust and Hayden White's Theory of Historical Explanation: the Theoretical Thinking of Absolutism, Relativism and Pluralism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(1): 69-73. |
[5] | LIANG Ping, KONG Ling-zhang. Empirical Research on the Types of Labor Dispute Reasons[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 55-60,87. |
[6] | SONG Xiu-jian. Theoretical Contest and the Understanding and Practice of Theory——A Case Study of the Spread of Socialism Theory in China for a Century[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 112-117. |
[7] | PANG Jin-you. Analysis of the Weak Government Theory of Modern Western Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 32-37. |
[8] | KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64. |
[9] | WANG Hong-zhe. The Legal Philosophy of Critical Rationalism: Albert's Opinions and Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 74-79. |
[10] | WAN Xin-fang. On the Practice of Peng Yuting's “Three Selfs” Principle[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 103-106. |
[11] | CHENG Mei-dong. Sun Yat-seng's Ideology of the Principle of Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 120-126,136. |
[12] | XIAO Jian-hua, LI Zhi-feng. From Adversary System to Cooperative System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 55-62. |
[14] | MA Liu-ying. On Amelioration of the System of Civil Witness in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 87-90. |
[15] | ZHANG Qin, LIN Jia-hu. Anlaysis on Chen Du-xiu's Theoretical Criticism to Populism in His Late Years[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 75-78. |
[16] | SONG Xue-mei. Research on the Reform of the Civil Retrial Procedure in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 29-33. |
[17] | ZHENG Xian-wen. A Elementary Study of the Civil Law concerning Foreign Affairs in Tang Dynasty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 24-29. |
[18] | SHAO Ming. Research on the Civil Suit[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 13-19. |
[19] | ZHANG Bei-gen. The Exposition of DENG Xiao-ping's Theory to Inherit,Abandon and Develop the Theory of the New Democratic Society[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 39-42. |
[20] | HUAN Jian-li. Individualism +Holism=Structuration Theory?——Summary and Evaluation to Methodology of Western Sociology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(1): 4-8. |