A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Political Culture in South Korea and Russia during Their Transition to Democracy

WU Qun-fang

Volume 22 Issue 2

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2006 > 22(2): 44-49

WU Qun-fang. A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Political Culture in South Korea and Russia during Their Transition to Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 44-49.

Citation:

WU Qun-fang. A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Political Culture in South Korea and Russia during Their Transition to Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 44-49.

Citation:

PDF( 271 KB)

A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Political Culture in South Korea and Russia during Their Transition to Democracy

WU Qun-fang

School of Humanities and Social Science University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2005-05-20
Available Online: 2021-06-29
Publish Date: 2021-06-29

Abstract

Abstract

South Korea and Russia, two important nations in the Asia-Pacific region, have started their course of transition to democracy since the late 1980s. Along with the development and deepening of the two nations' transition to democracy, the factor of cultural tradition also becomes more and more obvious. This article, through examining the actual effect of political culture (as a variable) in the two nations' democratic movement and the relationship between the political culture and the political developing path of these two nations, is aimed at demonstrating that it is important to fully consider the complexity of political culture background and the positive and negative impact therefrom in order for the model of transition more fit for the requirement of a nation's society and the demand of contemporary development, especially when designing the model of transition to democracy.
- democracy,
- transition to democracy,
- political culture

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Li-wei, YANG Xiu. Urban Community Governance under the Theory of Inclusion and Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 86-91.
[2]	JIANG Ping. The Viewpoint of “Harmony in Diversity” and Post-colonial Differentiation under the Perspective of Cultural Confliction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 78-84.
[3]	LIU Xiao-zhou. Checks and Balances and the “Vetocracy” Dilemma of American Democracy: A Study of American Democratic Efficiency from the Perspective of Institutional Costs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 87-94.
[4]	QU Jing. The Dialectical Succession of “Shangtong” and “Shangxian” to Democratic and Centralism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 95-102.
[5]	ZHAO Bing. Literature, Theory and Democratic Criticism in British Cultural Studies—Richard Hoggart: Anti-theoretical or Atheoretical?[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 114-119.
[6]	WU Wen-long. The Political Game in the Study of the Theory of Science: Recognition of the Polemics on the Three People's Principles during the Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 44-53.
[7]	PANG Jin-you. Morality and Law in the Context of Early Civilization: From a Comparative Perspective of the Political Culture[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 59-65.
[8]	WU Jun-bin. Analysis of the Value of Deliberative Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 144-149.
[9]	YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
[10]	YUN Chun-xi. The Acme of Thought that the People Are Foundation of Country or the Seed of Democracy——The Orientation of Huang Zongxi's Political Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 39-45.
[11]	CHEN Xi. Sticking to the Scientific Development, Constructing a Harmonious, Democratic and Creative University Culture[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 8-11.
[12]	HUANG Zhi-gao. On Relationship between Debate of Sanmin Doctrine and the Formation of New-Democracy Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 127-131.
[13]	PANG Jin-you. Modern Civil Society and Democratization: Possibility Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 36-43.
[14]	LI Zong-ping. Socialist Democratic Rule of Law and Socialist Harmonious Community[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 80-84.
[15]	CHU Jiang-ting. Post-colonialism Research and the Selection of Educational Development Strategy in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 4-7.
[16]	KANG Zhi-guo. An Analysis of ZENG Qi's Thought of Democratic Constitutionalism during the Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 73-76.