LIU Xiao-zhou. Checks and Balances and the “Vetocracy” Dilemma of American Democracy: A Study of American Democratic Efficiency from the Perspective of Institutional Costs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 87-94.
Citation: LIU Xiao-zhou. Checks and Balances and the “Vetocracy” Dilemma of American Democracy: A Study of American Democratic Efficiency from the Perspective of Institutional Costs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 87-94.

Checks and Balances and the “Vetocracy” Dilemma of American Democracy: A Study of American Democratic Efficiency from the Perspective of Institutional Costs

  • Received Date: 2018-08-07
    Available Online: 2021-05-22
  • A system of checks and balances is the basic institutional arrangement of American democratic politics.It plays an important role in preventing political tyranny,balancing diversified interests and enhancing decision-making prudence.However, this institutional arrangement requires sacrificing decision-making efficiency.In recent years, the views of the two major political parties—the Democrats and the Republicans—have become polarized.The presidency and the two houses of Congress are often controlled by different parties.The antagonism between the political parties has resulted in a “vetocracy.” The benefits of the American government's decentralized system have decreased,while the costs have risen remarkably.This has caused the operation of American democracy and state governance to be negatively impacted.To solve this problem,in theory,we can adopt the idea of reducing the opposition of the political parties without touching the institutional arrangement of checks and balances.We also can adopt the institutional reform paths of adjusting the legislative checks and balances between the U.S.Senate,the House of Representatives and the President, or changing the presidential system to a parliamentary system.In reality, the possibility of changing the institutional arrangement of checks and balances is very unlikely-unless institutional costs rise to a point that American society cannot afford.

     

  • [1]
    [美]汉密尔顿,杰伊,麦迪逊.联邦党人文集[M].程逢如,在汉,舒逊译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.
    [2]
    [美]格伦·贝克.常识——反对一个失控的美国[M].徐红燕译.北京:法律出版社,2010.
    [3]
    Partisan Polarization Surges in Bush,Obama Years[EB/OL].(2012-06-04)[2018-07-28].http://www.people-press.org/2012/06/04/partisan-polarization-surgesin-bush-obama-years/.
    [4]
    [美]弗朗西斯·福山.政治秩序与政治衰败:从工业革命到民主全球化[M].毛俊杰译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2015.
    [5]
    [美]弗朗西斯·福山.衰败的美利坚——政治制度失灵的根源[EB/OL].(2014-10-12)[2018-06-18].http://www.guancha.cn/fu-lang-xi-si-fu-shan/2014_10_12_275200.shtml.
    [6]
    [法]邦雅曼·贡斯当.古代人的自由与现代人的自由——贡斯当政治论文选[C].阎克文、刘满贵译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
    [7]
    Large Majorities See Checks and Balances,Right to Protest as Essential for Democracy[EB/OL].(2017-03-02)[2018-06-18].http://www.people-press.org/2017/03/02/large-majorities-see-checks-and-balancesright-to-protest-as-essential-for-democracy/.
    [8]
    [美]列奥·施特劳斯.古典政治理性主义的重生——施特劳斯思想入门[C].郭振华,叶然译.北京:华夏出版社,2011.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]XI Dongmei, WANG Jieya. Theoretical Origin and Practical Approach of the Connotation of Marxist People’s Subjectivity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(3): 119-128. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024090136
    [2]GAI Yi-xin, WANG Shu-qing. The Theoretical Basis and Practical Path of Whole-Process People’s Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 217-223. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100092
    [3]QU Jing. The Dialectical Succession of “Shangtong” and “Shangxian” to Democratic and Centralism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 95-102.
    [4]ZHANG Li-wei, YANG Xiu. Urban Community Governance under the Theory of Inclusion and Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 86-91.
    [5]WU Jun-bin. Analysis of the Value of Deliberative Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 144-149.
    [6]YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
    [7]YUN Chun-xi. The Acme of Thought that the People Are Foundation of Country or the Seed of Democracy——The Orientation of Huang Zongxi's Political Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 39-45.
    [8]CHEN Xi. Sticking to the Scientific Development, Constructing a Harmonious, Democratic and Creative University Culture[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 8-11.
    [9]PANG Jin-you. Modern Civil Society and Democratization: Possibility Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 36-43.
    [10]WU Qun-fang. A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Political Culture in South Korea and Russia during Their Transition to Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 44-49.
    [11]LI Zong-ping. Socialist Democratic Rule of Law and Socialist Harmonious Community[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 80-84.
    [12]HUANG Zhi-gao. On Relationship between Debate of Sanmin Doctrine and the Formation of New-Democracy Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 127-131.
    [13]CHU Jiang-ting. Post-colonialism Research and the Selection of Educational Development Strategy in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 4-7.
    [14]KANG Zhi-guo. An Analysis of ZENG Qi's Thought of Democratic Constitutionalism during the Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 73-76.
    [15]MA Liu-ying. On Amelioration of the System of Civil Witness in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 87-90.
    [16]MA Li-na. The Basic Socio-economic System:Justice and Efficiency[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 32-35.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 李俊,崔浩婷. 全过程人民民主的生成逻辑、内在优势与实践路径. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版). 2023(01): 1-9 .
    2. 李俊,崔浩婷. 全过程人民民主的理论逻辑、内在优势与实践路径. 青海社会科学. 2023(01): 5-13 .
    3. 李德恩. 人民法院宪法地位之维系. 北方工业大学学报. 2023(03): 92-101+121 .
    4. 过其欢,王义德. 全过程民主视域下完善乡村基层治理路径探析. 淮南师范学院学报. 2022(03): 104-109 .
    5. 王洪树. 制度探源:新时代中西方民主政治缘何“一治一乱”. 马克思主义与现实. 2022(05): 126-131 .
    6. 孙磊. “西方之乱”与“中国之治”根源探析:基于中西民族政策比较的视角. 民族论坛. 2021(02): 17-24 .
    7. 张桂林. 党和国家监督体系原理探析. 政治学研究. 2020(04): 2-14+125 .
    8. 王洪树,郭玲丽. “中国之治”与“西方之乱”的民主政治根源解析. 河南社会科学. 2020(10): 31-38 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 3.2 %FULLTEXT: 3.2 %META: 94.1 %META: 94.1 %PDF: 2.7 %PDF: 2.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.7 %其他: 8.7 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Girard: 0.1 %Girard: 0.1 %Yongin-si: 0.2 %Yongin-si: 0.2 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 2.7 %上海: 2.7 %上饶: 0.1 %上饶: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %十堰: 1.6 %十堰: 1.6 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哈密: 0.2 %哈密: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 1.8 %嘉兴: 1.8 %天津: 3.9 %天津: 3.9 %天门: 0.1 %天门: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宣城: 1.4 %宣城: 1.4 %常州: 0.7 %常州: 0.7 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 4.1 %扬州: 4.1 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋中: 0.2 %晋中: 0.2 %杭州: 2.7 %杭州: 2.7 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %温州: 2.1 %温州: 2.1 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 13.1 %漯河: 13.1 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 18.0 %芒廷维尤: 18.0 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.2 %萍乡: 0.2 %葵涌: 0.2 %葵涌: 0.2 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 17.3 %西宁: 17.3 %邯郸: 1.3 %邯郸: 1.3 %郑州: 4.3 %郑州: 4.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %铜仁: 0.2 %铜仁: 0.2 %长沙: 2.8 %长沙: 2.8 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他Central DistrictGirardYongin-si三明上海上饶东京东莞乐山佛山克拉玛依兰州北京十堰南京南通台州合肥呼和浩特哈密哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴天津天门太原威海宣城常州平顶山广州张家口德阳成都扬州日照昆明晋中杭州武汉汕头洛阳淄博淮安温州湖州漯河潍坊焦作珠海石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥荆门莱芜萍乡葵涌衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁邯郸郑州金华铜仁长沙青岛香港香港特别行政区马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1167) PDF downloads(33) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return